Applied Kinesiology: "An Unconscious Fraud" From the Quackometer...to 3 North American NDs

here, I cite from a recent Quackometer post regarding applied kinesiology [AK; see 001., below]; then, I illustrate the use of AK by NDs [see 002., below]:

001. Andy Lewis writes in "How Applied Kinesiology Can be Used to Justify any Quack Treatment" (2011-05-19):

"you may not be surprised to learn that applied kinesiology was invented by a chiropractor [...whereby] customer and practitioner get locked into the mutual delusion that muscle strength can be altered in the presence of 'good' and 'bad' substances [...AK] is widely used to [fakely] diagnose allergies and other health problems, and then on the back of a fake diagnosis [/ diagnostic test], sell lots of vitamin pills, diets and dubious devices [...AK] is an unconscious fraud caused by suggestion and the ideomotor effect [...] it lies at the heart of much quackery and I hope that the Nightingale Collaboration will be making it a Focus of the Month in [the] future, as this nonsense really needs to be challenged."

Note: hear, hear.  Me too.

002. these first-page results occurred via a Google.com web search parameter ""applied kinesiology" naturopathic diagnosis" [without the outside quotes] (2011-05-30):

002.a. Alberta, Canada's Lenung, K. (ND CCNM) states in "Applied Kinesiology" [vsc 2011-05-30]:

"applied kinesiology is a system that evaluates structural, chemical, and mental aspects of health using manual muscle testing alongside conventional diagnostic methods. The essential premise of applied kinesiology that is not shared by mainstream medical theory is that every organ dysfunction is accompanied by a weakness in a specific corresponding muscle, the viscerosomatic relationship."

Note: really.  The wonders of naturopathic gullibility never ceases to amaze.  Not shared because it isn't true.

002.b. Portland, Oregon's Thomas, N. (ND NCNM) states in "Applied Kinesiology" [vsc 2011-05-30; my comments are in bold]:

"applied kinesiology [...] AK balances the structural, chemical and mental sides of health [...it's] used for:

musculoskeletal issues - pain, injuries, sprains, loss of function, limited range of motion, spinal and joint misalignment, TMJ dysfunction, etc.;

disease and illness prevention and recovery;

increasing organ and gland health and function;

releasing and managing emotions and stress;

improving brain and nervous system function and co-ordination;

discovering individual nutritional needs and sensitivities [...in sum]

AK treatment addresses the function of your body's muscles, organs, glands, spine, joints, nervous system, lymph, meridian flow (based on Chinese medicine), emotions, and nutrition [...]";

that's quite a list.

"applied kinesiology (AK) is a diagnostic and therapeutic practice [...] its diagnostic principles are based on traditional Chinese medicine in which every muscle in the body is related to an organ, gland or acupuncture meridian. By testing specific muscles, the doctor can identify areas of dysfunction in the body and apply the appropriate method of treatment [...]";

a lot of bunk there -- I'll guess it doesn't happen for free, either.

"AK blends therapeutic modalities from cranial-sacral therapy, sacral-occipital technique, acupuncture meridian therapies, chiropractic, naturopathy, osteopathy, clinical nutrition, and energy psychology [...]";

because when all that junk petered out, a rebranding had to happen!

"an AK doctor is able to examine how areas of the body (organ, glands, etc) are functioning, locate the cause of any dysfunction, and apply therapy towards the specific areas to restore and maintain health. In this way, AK is able to help the areas that need the support, and prevent pathology and disease before it occurs."

promises, promises.

002.c. Newington, Connecticut's Riley, K.M. (ND Bastyr 1984) who states on the Naturopathic Gathering 2011 page [vsc 2011-05-30]:

"Kathleen Riley has been practicing naturopathic medicine for the past 26 years [...]  Dr. Riley incorporates applied kinesiology [...] and other therapeutics into her practice as a way to help her patients effect deeper healing [...] she has worked extensively with patients with Lyme disease for many years and has much to share in how to approach these patients using our naturopathic principals [sp., principles]. She strives to try and help her patients work toward healing in the way that she was taught by her teachers, especially John Bastyr and Bill Mitchell and is excited to be able to share her experience through cases and conversation at this year’s Gathering."

Note: the Gathering is about the 'essentially naturopathic'.  And yes her alma mater Bastyr's motto is "science-based natural medicine", an absurd label placed upon what is TRULY not scientific at all --  e.g. much of naturopathy's principles' content [vitalism, supernaturalism and such, for starters].

003. AK, therein, is VERY naturopathic:

pseudo and nonsensical.

New York State's ND Marcantonio and NCNM: Science and Efficacy Claims Upon the Science-Ejected (2005, 2011 respectively)

here, I cite from a 2005 Buffalo News piece written by New York State ND Marcantonio claiming that naturopathy is 'science, science science' [see 001.a., below]; and from her practice's 2011 web page that claims homeopathy is "effective" [see 001.b., below]; then, from her alma mater NCNM [see 002., below]; and finally, from the Quackometer's recent post on homeopathy [see 003., below]:

001. Marcantonio, R. (ND NCNM 2001) states:

001.a. in the Buffalo News's "Education, Licensing Standards Would Protect Public"(2005-08-04) [vsc from their archive 2011-05-24; access to BN's archived articles is available for a small fee]:

"[as NYANP treasurer] NYANP would like to state that we share Andrew Skolnick's concerns in his July 27 article about practitioners using the title 'naturopath' who have no scientific, medical or accredited medical educational background [...we are] licensed naturopathic doctor (N.D.) with extensive science-based training in the safe use of natural therapies [...] like conventional medical schools, the first two years concentrate on the basic biomedical sciences: anatomy, physiology, histology, embryology, pathology and biochemistry. The second two years integrate the basic biomedical sciences with clinical sciences, focusing on a broad range of preventive therapeutic interventions: clinical nutrition and diet, botanical medicine, homeopathy, naturopathic physical medicine and hydrotherapy and counseling."

Note: science, science, science.  Homeopathy has been considered nonsense by science even farther back than this century!  But not for naturopathy: their licensure exam labels homeopathy "science".

001.b. in "NHC Medicinary" [practicing with Lim, M. (ND NCNM); vsc 2011-05-25]:

"a 300 year old medicine, homeopathy is based on the 'aw of similars', like cures like. Homeopathic remedies prepared from serial dilutions of either plant, animal, or mineral substances act to stimulate the body's own healing mechanisms. Homeopathy is quite a safe and effective tool for children as well as adults."

Note: stating homeopathy is effective is like stating voodoo and witchcraft are effective.

002. back to the mother ship, NCNM:

so, NCNM is famous for stating 'the full monty' regarding naturopathy: notice the science claim upon the vitalistic science-ejected, and the homeopathy included under that posed science umbrella as "powerful".  Fascinating that the practice page of ND Marcantonio that supposedly defines naturopathy doesn't fully disclose these wacko contents, and instead gives us CODING of naturopathy's essential premises.

Note: in sum, so much for professionalism, science, transparency, informed consent and above-board commerce!

003. as Andy Lewis writes in "The Myths of NHS Homeopathy" (2011-05-24):

"I have already spelled out in some detail why such research would be deeply unethical: firstly, we already know with a very high degree of certainty that homeopathy is a superstitious form of medical treatment that is completely ineffective."

Note: hear, hear.

Popular Science on the Nonscientific Status of Vitalism - 1884-04

here, I go BACK into the 1800s and cite from an article in Popular Science Monthly regarding the nonscientific status of vitalism:

William G. Stevenson, M.D. writes in "Physiological Significance of Vital Force" (PSM 1884-04, pp. 760-773:

"modern science has so extended the horizon of our mental perspective, has achieved such brilliant triumphs in so many departments of thought, and, on the basis of verified fact, has erected such an imposing superstructure of useful knowledge in the domain of inorganic nature, that some, rejecting the vitalistic theories of the past, have accepted the belief that the deeper mysteries of vital phenomena will, in final analysis, be demonstrated to be but resultants of physical forces acting under complex conditions of organization [p.760...] to some, 'vitalism' yet maintains its position in the philosophic realm or organizations, and a 'vital force,' independent of and antagonistic to physical force, yet presides over the manifestations of organic bodies.  This, if true, necessitates 'two distinct sciences and two distinct orders of nature,' which, though related, are not reciprocal. This view is not in harmony with either chemical, physical, or biological science of the present day, and stands in direct contradiction to the accepted doctrine of the correlation and conservation of energy [...] matter, or material organization, is, therefore, so far as human knowledge goes, an absolute condition upon which all life-manifestations depend, and to assert, as do the 'vitalists,' that this vital energy -- an agency which cannot be verified, though dependent upon a material condition for a display of its actions -- is not related to it, but is independent of it and under distinct and antagonistic laws, is an assumption at variance with scientific truth and reason [p.765]."

Note: yes, this was written in 1884. The full version is available for free at books.google.com. Naturopathy, meanwhile, absurdly claims that vitalism survives scientific scrutiny NOW.  Notice that vitalism was science-ejected EVEN BEFORE the discovery of DNA.

I'll repeat what the author so eloquently states: vital energy is an assumption at variance with scientific truth and reason.  Yet, somehow naturopathy schools were started in the late 1900s [such as UB; and NUHS in 200x with the 's' standing for SCIENCES] and label such vitalism [and similar science-ejected kind] "science", and engaged in educational commerce based on such falsehoods.

Five-Year Anniversary of My TNM Review at Amazon!!!

here, I reiterate my review of the Textbook of Natural Medicine, 3rd. ed. that I'd put up at Amazon five years ago, "This is Scientific Medicine?" (May 20, 2006):

"I recently viewed the new chapter concerning 'naturopathic philosophy' [in the 3rd edition, 2005] within this text at the University of Bridgeport's library, as there's a naturopathic school there that I attended. The chapter discusses the premises of 'the naturopathic.' Do you really want to be treated by a physician who conflates (blends) supernatural, nonscientific, scientifically discarded, idealistic, metaphysical, religious and scientific information -- and presents the whole thing as [supposedly] scientific? [a misrepresentation: Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District anyone?]. Check out "The Epistemic Conflation of a School of Thought Claiming to be Scientific" and "Why I Dropped Out of Naturopathy School" - online per me, Rob Cullen. [THIS is future healthcare? I disagree, these prophets are truly 'facing backward']. I'm highly ethically disturbed by this text and naturopathy, still. I'll just make one point about this book's contention that complexity, self-regulation, and evolution indicate that life defies the laws of natural science {and is therefore supernatural} -- particularly the second law of thermodynamics, per physics, in terms of life as supposedly being antientropic as indicated by life's evolving complexity [p.081-082] -- therefore justifying, particularly, vitalism and its handmaiden teleology-finalism. [Beliefs essential to 'the naturopathic'; explanations no longer within science at all; rejected-knowledge in terms of the scientific].[Yes, evolution! Even though evolution is actually the culmination of 'methodological naturalism,' which is HOW science approaches phenomena, that is: SCIENCE DOES NOT INVOKE THE SUPERNATURAL {which includes ideas like naturopathy's vitalism, spiritism and kind}, science determines its contents based upon EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, and exceptionally LEAN explanatory approaches {per parsimony: as in 'do not multiply entities needlessly'; that is, if not ascribed by the evidence, IT ISN'T A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION}]. Ah, HUGE problem. The second law deals with closed systems and life's context is within an open system, in terms of thermodynamics. [For the compliance of the 'living' with thermodynamic law, see Atwater & Rosa's work in 1897 which specifically speaks in terms of the first law {the Kinesiology Dept. of Rice University has a nice web page on biological thermodynamics}; and see 'Biological Thermodynamics' ISBN 0521795494 {p.321 specifically speaks in terms of the second law}]. UB says NDs practice "scientific medicine" and naturopathy is "health science." Hmmm, what kind of [supposed] science text gets something so simple WRONG? Naturopathy is a 'self-labeled science-based' area that won't let go of what has not been considered scientific [the supernatural, the metaphysical, the idealistic, the scientifically-refuted and -discarded -- and kind; i.e., the tenets of their doctrines] for several decades PLUS. This text reflects naturopathic 'epistemic mislabeling nonsense' [e.g. naturopathy's vitalism ("life force"), spiritism ("personal spiritual development; body, mind, spirit"), autoentheism ("god-power within"), teleology-finalism ('life force' as "intelligent, purposeful, goal-directed") and 'whatever else idealism'/ woo-woo AREN'T science-based (or even empirical phenomena, as in therefore 'not scienceable') -- but are falsely labeled as scientific by naturopathy anyway]. In reality, minimally, a mandatory, manipulatable, spiritual, 'underlying' {metaphysical, supernatural, idealistic and what-not} 'life force' {of many aliases} immediately responsible for states of health and disease is INSTEAD AN ARTICLE OF FAITH {aka a 'sectarian medicine' belief set}. Hmmm: "the most thoroughly researched and carefully referenced text on natural medicine has been revised to include the most up-to-date information...." It has been a couple of months since I read that chapter, and I'm still, honestly, LAUGHING OUT LOUD. Naturopathy is, essentially, a 'supernatural science' (an oxymoron; particularly, vital-force-spirit, spiritism, autoentheism, and teleology-finalism as "science-based" are arrived at through a radical unlimiting of the boundaries of 'the scientific'); while evidence from science doesn't support the supernatural / theistic, the metaphysical, or the idealistic; and vitalism and spiritism, in terms of physiological agency, are refuted biological hypotheses. -rc."

Note: and I wouldn't change a thing.  Well, I would change the fact that they bamboozled me into studying the junk for four years with false labels in terms of commerce and education, derailing my life at great cost.

"Alternative Medical Treatments Rarely Work" - The Economist and Edzard Ernst

here, it cite from a recent article in The Economist regard alt. med. as placebo:

001. someone writes in "Think Yourself Better" (2011-05-19):

"Edzard Ernst, the world’s first professor of complementary medicine [...is] no breathless promoter of snake oil. Instead, he and his research group have pioneered the rigorous study of everything from acupuncture and crystal healing to Reiki channelling and herbal remedies [...] over the years Dr Ernst and his group have run clinical trials and published over 160 meta-analyses of other studies [...] his findings are stark. According to his 'Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine', around 95% of the treatments he and his colleagues examined—in fields as diverse as acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy and reflexology—are statistically indistinguishable from placebo treatments [...] Dr Ernst believes his work helps address a serious public-health problem. He points out that conventional medicines must be shown to be both safe and efficacious before they can be licensed for sale. That is rarely true [we call this 'epistemic charity' in the land of knowledge study] of alternative treatments, which rely on a mixture of appeals to tradition and to the 'natural' [...] a placebo is a sham medical treatment [...] its main scientific use at the moment is in clinical trials as a baseline for comparison with another treatment [...] the effect is strongest for those disorders that are predominantly mental and subjective [...] practitioners of alternative medicine often excel at harnessing the placebo effect, says Dr Ernst. They offer long, relaxed consultations with their customers [...] and they believe passionately in their treatments, which are often delivered with great and reassuring ceremony. That alone can be enough to do good, even though the magnets, crystals and ultra-dilute solutions [that is HOMEOPATHY, folks] applied to the patients are, by themselves, completely useless."

Note: ah, yeah...

Naturopathy Irrationality Microcosm: New York State's ND Fey's Science Label, the NCNM Opaque Revealed, and NPLEX Homeopathy Absurdity

here, I first cite a 'naturopathy-is-science' claim from ND Fey [see 001.a., below]; then, the whole shebang / epistemic irrationality from her alma mater NCNM that explains, explicitly, 'the naturopathic' [see 001.b., below]; and finally, there is ND Fey's claim that homeopathy is "highly effective" [see 002., below]:

Fey, A.H. (ND NCNM) states:

001. 'the naturopathics' supposed science-basis:

001.a. in "Naturopathic News Fall 2008" [vsc 2011-05-08]:

"what is different between us [NDs] and MD's? Basically our education is focused on the same basic sciences as an M.D., but ND’s also study natural approaches."

Note: ah, so simply related.  So, the science is claimed as actual science / science-that-is-science.

001.b. the opaque revealed: ND Fey's alma mater National College of Natural Medicine states in "Principles of Healing" [vsc 2011-05-20; my comments are in bold]:

"the practice of naturopathic medicine emerges from six principles of healing. These principles are based on the objective observation of the nature of health and disease and are examined continually in light of scientific analysis [...]";

ah, the GRAND / ALL ENCOMPASSING label that naturopathy uses upon 'the naturopathic': that such is, essentially, scientific and objective fact!  As I've said many times, the claim is that 'the essentially naturopathic' survives scientific scrutiny.

"these principles stand as the distinguishing marks of the profession: [#1] the healing power of nature, vis medicatrix naturae: the body has the inherent ability to establish, maintain, and restore health. The healing process is ordered and intelligent; nature heals through the response of the life force. The physician’s role is to facilitate and augment this process [...#2] the process of healing includes the generation of symptoms, which are, in fact, expressions of the life force attempting to heal itself [...this is] the practice of promoting health through stimulation of the vital force [...]";

ah, the 'of the professions' claim, and vitalism!  The HPN-VMN / LF / VF is claimed as scientifically IN FACT.  This is FARTHEST from the truth.  Vitalism is IN FACT hugely science ejected: and stating it survives scientific scrutiny doesn't make it so.  That is a form of magical thinking, and a sign of scientific ignorance.  Naturopathy claims professionalism and science but both are transparent and not false, generally speaking. The term "profess" is within the text of that page seven times, actually.

"homeopathic medicine [HM] is based on the principle of 'like cures like.' Clinical observation indicates that it works on a subtle, yet powerful, energetic level, gently acting to promote healing on the physical, mental, and spiritual levels [...]";

ah, so now within the 'able to survive scientific scrutiny' is homeopathy and supernaturalism.  HILARIOUS.  So, supposedly HM works, is powerful, acts, and though natural is supernatural-effecting; and supposedly all this is science supported.

Note: this page is, in my view, the Rosetta Stone of naturopathy.  ND Fey does not relate these contents on her New York State web pages, to my knowledge.  That is why I call her portrayal of naturopathy "opaque".  NCNM doesn't accurately represent the true 'nature' of naturopathy, either: what's science-ejected falsely labeled as science-supported.  And this is all licensed in Oregon from the educational institution all the way into the NDs clinical suite: licensed falsehood.

002. ND Fey's super-absurd naturopathic claims regarding homeopathy's efficacy and its science basis:

002.a. in "Naturopathic Medicine" she writes [vsc 2011-05-20]:

"homeopathic medicine [HM] is a holistic [whatever that means!] form of medicine that aims to help the body heal itself. It works for both acute illnesses and chronic conditions. Homeopathic remedies act on both the physical and emotional level with seldom side effects, and they are safe for all ages. Homeopathy is a powerful form of medicine that has been used for more than 200 years."

Note: the claim is that HM heals, works, acts POWERFULLY.

002.b. in "Naturopathic News Fall 2007" she writes [vsc 2011-05-20; my comments are in bold]:

"homeopathy treats the whole person by using minute doses to stimulate the body's own healing mechanisms. Homeopathic remedies are nontoxic, inexpensive, and highly effective [...]";

the claim is that homeopathy treats, stimulates, and is hugely effective.

"naturopathic doctors (NDs) receive a 4-year postgraduate level training at an accredited naturopathic medical school. The 4-year training includes graduate level study in the medical sciences and clinical medicine; in addition to, training in naturopathic therapeutics [like homeopathy]. After graduation, NDs must pass a national board examination [NPLEX] consisting of basic medical sciences, clinical sciences as well as naturopathic modalities [like homeopathy] to become licensed doctors."

and, of course, the claim that 'naturopathy subset homeopathy' is science-girded!  Now, I'd like to straighten out the location of homeopathy within that NPLEX examination, because what is written above is the 'old' NPLEX.  It is in fact most accurate to state this formulation when it comes to that exam, currently: NPLEX subset clinical science subset homeopathy.  The formulation, of course, is in fact false.  This is one item that supports my label: licensed falsehood.  BUT, as we've seen from the principles page of ND Fey's alma mater NCNM, naturopathy indeed equates science and nonscience and then labels the whole thing falsely science.  The specific labeling of homeopathy as science is merely a symptom of this epistemic muddle known as naturopathy.  Of note: science has HUGELY refuted homeopathy to such an extent that further research is considered UNETHICAL.  Oh SNAP!

003. what's so sad:

journalists these days don't seem to have the chops to report on naturopathy IN FULL, IN DEPTH, and ACCURATELY.  Each piece instead seems like an ad placed by the NDs.

wouldn't it be nice of journalists abided by the highest of journalistic professional code?

New York's Medical Society Opposes ND Licensure [aka Licensed Falsehood]

here, I cite from a recent article in the Albany Times Union regarding the 2011 New York State licensure push by NDs [see 001., below]; then, I cite from the mentioned ND's own web pages [002. and 003., below]:

001. Cathleen Crowley reports in "Naturopathic Doctors Seek New York Recognition" (2011-05-18)[my comments are in bold]:

"naturopaths were at the Capitol on Tuesday lobbying for bills [...] sponsored by Sen. Kenneth LaValle, R-Port Jefferson  and Assemblyman Sam Hoyt, D-Buffalo [..] that would recognize them as licensed professionals [...]";

ah, that 'of-the-professions' claim.  But professions are transparent and not based on falsehood. 

"[currently] New York law does not allow them [NDs] to diagnose or treat patients or prescribe medications [...]";  

I'm sure eventually they'll get licensed...and then we'll have another state directly condoning falsehood!

"'we are not MDs and we are not trying to be MDs [...] we are primary care providers that stress natural interventions for preventing health problems' [...]"; 

ah, the "natural" fallacy and 'bait and switch'.  The last time I checked, for naturopathy "natural" also includes the science-ejected, the figmentatious, and the supernatural.  Do you want to go to a PCP who incorrectly believes that imaginary vital forces are at the root of physiology, and that magic beans and unicorn tears will treat  real-life medical problems?

"'our model is preventive and well care, not sick care [...] which is a more cost-effective approach' [...said] Korey DiRoma, a naturopathic doctor [...whose] Delmar patients drive across the state line [to Vermont] so he can examine them, diagnose their health problems and recommend treatment [...with] exercise, diet and supplements for health problems [...]"; 

licensed falsehood like Vermont's ND licensure!  Interesting that what isn't mentioned is that homeopathy is a frequent therapy used by NDs and though the remedies are empty and the modality is science-ejected, naturopathy's licensure exam labels homeopathy a "clinical science".  So much for reporting with DEPTH.  I will use ND DiRoma's web pages as an illustration of naturopathy's "model" in 002., below. 

"naturopathic doctors have a bachelor's degree and four years of post-graduate training at accredited schools. They receive an average of 2,800 hours of clinical training -- compared to medical doctors who have 3,200 hours of training and nurse practitioners who have 700 hours, said Donielle Wilson, president of the New York Association of Naturopathic Physicians [...]"; 

and that's the difference, quantities?  Me thinks not.  I'll state is simple, and it is a matter of knowledge quality: the kind of epistemic monkey business / irrationality that you see in already licensed states like Oregon, wherein the hugely science-ejected is falsely labeled science, COULDN'T GET YOU THROUGH A BACHELOR'S DEGREE never mind the doctoral level that it sits within unless, of course, one is now allowed to maintain that a domain includes that which it by definition excludes and to engage in commerce based on that false position / irrationality.  That is, by the way, the DEFINITION of a licensed ND state! 

"the Medical Society of New York State opposes the bill, saying the it is too broad and the title 'naturopathic doctor' is misleading [...and] that medical doctors receive a more rigorous training than naturopathic doctors [...] 'while the bill prohibits such licensee from practicing or claiming to practice another licensed profession, including medicine, the title itself will convey to the public that the naturopathic practitioner is in fact the equivalent of a licensed physician'"; 

hear, hear.  Misleading in so many ways.  And, again, the rigor is not an issue of quantity, but contents and framing.  Since naturopathy has reversed all values -- science is also nonscience, professionalism is now false commerce, what's natural is now what's supernatural -- yes. 

"licensing naturopaths would open the doors for naturopathic schools and insurance coverage for their services in New York." 

and then education falsehood ensues, as my lived experience informs! 

002. naturopathy's knowledge model [the actual difference], via DiRoma, A.K. (ND SCNM), who states in "Naturopathic Medicine" [vsc 2011-05-18; my comments are in bold]:

"naturopathic physicians are trained as primary health care practitioners, whose diverse techniques include modern and traditional, scientific and empirical methods [...] a licensed naturopathic doctor (N.D.) attends a five-year graduate-level naturopathic medical school and is educated in all of the same basic sciences as an M.D. [...]"; 

science, science, science.  I'd argue that since the "science" of naturopathy includes what is science-ejected, this statement is false.  When "science" is not science, it is not the "same" science. 

"offering [...] natural remedies that are safe and effective are the inherent philosophy of naturopathic medicine [...such as] homeopathic medicine [...]"; 

after all that supposedly graduate-level science, we come to homeopathy falsely postured as effective. Claiming homeopathy has efficacy is like stating magic spells are effective medical treatments -- false.  But, based on what naturopathy does to science, I'm thinking that even magic spells would be acceptable within their realm to label as 'science-based natural medicine'. 

"[naturopathy is] founded upon a holistic philosophy [...] Korey DiRoma, N.D. believes in the healing power of nature [...] the body’s innate ability to heal [...] the goal of a naturopathic doctor is to employ therapies that support and promote the body's natural healing process [HPN / coded vitalism]." 

ah, that HPN.  HPN is, of course, a coding for that most fundamental of naturopathic beliefs: vitalism, which is their worldview, is truly science-discarded, and which obviously they LOVE to code. 

003. some transparency / decoding:

a while ago, ND DiRoma used to state naturopathy's essential science-ejected vitalism quite clearly in "The Team" [now buried, but archived!]:

"as a naturopathic doctor [...] I believe that there is a vital inner force and in disease it can be suppressed, not allowing one to function optimally. Naturopathic medicine is about stimulating that vital force and allowing it to thrive. As a naturopathic doctor at the Center for Integrative Health and Healing, I am committed to facilitating this healing process for my patients to achieve optimal health and well being."

Note: see, the truly sectarian "nature" of naturopathy is being submerged.  My guess is in order to not hold up licensure.  But, the heart of professionalism is transparency and accuracy, which isn't happening here: this vitalistic belief is science-ejected, hidden, and never communicated by naturopaths to be the actually science-ejected figmentation that it is.

Connecticut's ND Gruber Claims Homeopathy as Biologically Active / Effective

here, I cite from a recent newspaper article whereby a New Canaan, Connecticut naturopath states that homeopathy is an effective allergy treatment [see 001., below]; and then from the web page of that ND whereby homeopathy is labeled effective [see 002., below]:

001. Melvin Mason reports in "New Canaan Physician Pushes Natural Allergy Cures" (2011-05-15)[saved 2011-05-15]:

"Dr. Gary Gruber [...] who also teaches naturopathic medicine at the University of Bridgeport [(his alma mater, actually)...] recommends [...] for people with longstanding allergy problems [...] homeopathic drops to desensitize the eyes."

Note: me thinks homeo. is being posed as specifically medicinal.

002. ND Gruber states in "Services" [vsc 2011-05-15]:

"I have effective therapies [...e.g.] homeopathic medicines are very small doses of natural substances that can stimulate the body's self-healing response without side effects. This gentle, effective system of medicine is based on the principle that 'like cures like'. Homeopathy supports healing and does not interfere with conventional or pharmaceutical treatments."

Note: so, there is a claim of biological activity and efficacy / medicinality.  But, we know homeopathy in fact is so inert that its recommendation is considered unethical [deceptive] and further research is unwarranted [it's implausible].  Yet, at the University of Bridgeport, naturopathy is STILL labeled a "health science" [vsc 2011-05-15] and within it is homeopathy [vsc 2011-05-15].

naturopathy -- truly the reversal of all values / a strange land of [false] educational and clinical commerce.

perhaps the article should be titled "New Canaan Metaphysician Pushes Magic Beans and Unicorn Tears as Allergy Cures."

Naturopathic Irrationality Microcosm: New York State's ND Lisanti and the Qi-eesy 'Nature' of Naturopathy...and Scientific Consensus

here, I cite from the web pages of New York State ND Lisanti, wherein science as a commerce-label is placed upon the science-ejected [see 001., below]; then, I cite from a recent source regarding that science-ejected and essential-to-naturopathy vitalistic concept [see 002., below]:

001. Lisanti, F. (ND NCNM) states [for his youtube site, click here]:

001.a. the claim that naturopathy is science in:

001.a.i. in "Definition of Naturopathic Medicine" [needs vsc]:

"naturopathic medicine is a [...] science [...] naturopathic medicine is distinguished by the principles upon which its practice is based. These principles are continually re-examined in the light of scientific advances. The techniques of naturopathic medicine include [...the] scientific and empirical [...NDs are] comprehensively trained in the science of natural healthcare."

Note: science, science, science, science.

001.a.ii. in "Naturopathic Medicine Clinic in Westchester, NY" [vsc 2010-07-30]:

"[in the video] naturopathic doctors cooperate with all other branches of medical science [...in the description] naturopathic medicine is distinguished by the principles upon which its practice is based. These principles are continually re-examined in the light of scientific advances."

Note: yes, that overarching claim that naturopathy is within medical science and filters its contents through scientific scrutiny!

001.a.iii. in "About Classical Chinese Medicine" [vsc 2010-07-30]:

"the time-honored science of classical Chinese medicine (CCM) [...] CCM remains firmly committed to its ancient roots. CCM is a science in its own right."

Note: science, science.

001.a.iv. in "IMS Frequently Asked Questions" [vsc 2010-07-30]:

"naturopathic medicine [...] incorporates scientific advances from medical disciplines throughout the world. Many of the individual therapies used in naturopathic medical practice have been scientifically validated [...] the academic training in medical sciences of naturopathic and conventional physicians is similar."

Note: science, science, science.

001.a.v. in "Does Naturopathic Medicine Work?" [vsc 2010-08-01]:

"does naturopathic medicine work effectively? Naturopathic medicine has its own unique body of knowledge [...] it also incorporates scientific advances [...] many of the individual therapies used in naturopathic medical practice have been scientifically validated especially in the areas of [etc....including] homeopathy, acupuncture [...] the trend is that those naturopathic methods which are tested in well-designed studies are validated."

Note:

001.a.vi. in "The History of Naturopathic Medicine" [vsc 2010-08-01]:

"the naturopathic profession is committed to ongoing scientific research and development [...per] modern scientific methods."

Note:

001.a.vii. in "Natural Allergy Relief" [vsc 2011-05-11],  "No Need to Be Sad When You Struggle With SAD" [vsc 2011-05-11],  "Stop Acne: Water + Diet + CCM + De-Stress = Naturopathic Remedy" [vsc 2011-05-11], "Trials of the Spine: Naturopathic Relief for Minor to Major Back Pain" [vsc 2011-05-10], "Preventing Prostate Pain" [vsc 2011-05-10], in "Infertility: Naturopathic and Acupuncture Approaches" [vsc 2011-05-11], "Naturopathic Medicine and Acupuncture for Headaches" [vsc 2011-05-10], "Experience 21st Century Healthcare, Integrating Cutting Edge Natural Science with Ageless Healing Arts" [vsc 2011-05-10], "Mind Your Metals: Natural Heavy Metal Detoxification" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"[the following smarmy language] it's with the intention of inspiration and integrity that our highly trained doctor creates customized health plans that synergize the best of healing arts with contemporary natural medical science."

Note: many pages states this smarmyness.

001.a.viii. in "Growing by Knowing: Wheat Grass – WOW!" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"a scientist named Charles Schnabel who was looking to perfect chicken’s health first discovered the nutritive powers of wheat grass in the 1930s."

Note: science

001.a.ix. in "Organic Foods and Children: Why Organic Matters the Most for Kids" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"modern organic farming methods that include a wide basis of scientific knowledge and thousands of years of history and experience."

Note: science.

001.a.x. in "Integrative Therapies for Fibromyalgia" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"scientific research indicates that tui na, Chinese massage, and movement therapies like qigong and yoga can reduce pain and improve symptoms in fibromyalgia patients."

Note: science.

001.a.xi. in "Therapies" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"naturopathic treatments [...] this practice is the science, philosophy and art of disease diagnosis, treatment and prevention of illness, using natural therapies and medicines [...] the naturopathic approach to diet and nutrition has been validated in many scientifically based professional journals on nutrition and dietary sciences [...] scientific research is demonstrating that some plant substances have comparable effects to synthetic drugs in clinical situations [...] naturopathic doctors are extensively trained in the art and science of botanical medicine."

Note: more science, science, science, science.

001.a.xii. in "Natural Health and Healing and Your Child" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"perhaps you are among this group, or maybe you are among the growing number of parents who are look to ancient and modern systems for natural healing as they are backed by scientific research."

Note: science.

001.b. the reality that naturopathy is based on the vitalistic / science-ejected:

001.b.i. in "Naturopathic Doctors" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"in short, naturopathic doctors or NDs design treatments that work with your vital force [VF]."

Note: VF.  In short.

001.b.ii. in "Spring Liver Cleansing: The Basics" [vsc 2010-07-31, 2011-05-11]:

"a clean liver is advantageous for healthy regulation of your vital life force (qi) [VLF, Q] and blood as they flow through your body."

Note: VLF = Q.

001.b.iii. in "Cleansing the Liver for Spring" [vsc 2010-07-31]:

"a healthy liver is like a tree swaying in the wind. The tree is flexible because proper nutrients are flowing to all areas of its trunk and branches. If the tree is unhealthy, a strong wind will snap off the branches cut-off from the plant’s life force [LF]."

Note: LF.

001.b.iv. in "Acupuncture as an Alternative Therapy for Pain Management" [vsc 2010-07-31]:

"acupuncture was developed in China 3000 years ago to manage the flow of life force or qi [LF, Q] throughout the body."

Note: LF = Q

001.b.v. in "The History of Acupuncture" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"acupuncture was and still is a major mode of treatment for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) practitioners. A direct translation from this early text describes acupuncture as putting holes in the body to regulate qi [Q...] what is qi? The literal translation of qi from Chinese means 'breath' just as our English word 'spirit' comes from the Latin 'spiritus' or 'breath.' Qi can be understood as your life force or vital energy [LF, VE]. You can imagine pathways of qi flowing through your body [...] qi operates like [...] water ways [...] the pathways where qi flows are called meridians [...] if qi cannot take its normal course, excess qi will accumulate at the impasse and other areas of your body will not receive the vitality needed to be well. Improper flow manifests as pain or sickness, be it a tummy ache or insomnia [...] acupuncture is used to regulate the flow of qi by inserting thin metal needles at specific points along the meridians where qi flows [...] information gathered during the diagnostic process will inform your acupuncturist where qi is imbalanced. Then, he or she will work along meridians where qi flows to problem area [...e.g.] placement strengthens the flow of qi to the kidney if it is deficient or to drains qi if there is excess [...] to remove blockages of energy [E] and to promote free flow [...] some patients say that they feel a pleasurable sensation when a desired point is located. We call this 'the arrival of the qi'."

Note: Q = LF = VE = E.  Kind of like the arrival of the Tooth Fairy.

 

001.c. tracing it back -- Lisanti has both an ND and an LAc from NCNM -- we can see that his alma mater, NCNM, is the source for this at-odds irrationality of the science-based science-ejected:

 

001.c.1. regarding naturopathy, science, and vitalism, NCNM states:

 

that naturopathy is science and contains nonscience, so: science subset naturopathy subset nonscience.  Wacko.

 

001.c.2. regarding TCM, science, and vitalism [spiritism] NCNM states:

 

is a kind of supernatural science per "the School of Classical Chinese Medicine (CCM) at NCNM [...is] committed to training clinicians capable of tapping the true power of this ancient yet timeless system, which is both a highly sophisticated medical science and a deeply spiritual art form."

 

002. what science says, outright regarding vitalism / supernaturalism:

 

002.a. first, a crowd-sourced product, Wikipedia's article "Supernatural":

 

"the supernatural or supranatural [...] is anything above or beyond what one holds to be natural or exists outside natural law and the observable universe. Science limits its explanations for phenomena to natural explanations, a process known as methodological naturalism, and cannot consider supernatural explanations, as they cannot be investigated empirically. To explain something using natural causes and excluding supernatural causes is to naturalize it. To explain something as resulting from supernatural causes is to supernaturalize it.  Supernatural themes are often associated with paranormal and occult ideas, suggesting the possibility of interaction with the supernatural by means of summoning or trance. In secular societies, religious miracles are typically perceived as supernatural claims, as are spells and curses, divination, and the afterlife. Characteristics for phenomena claimed as supernatural are anomaly, uniqueness, and uncontrollability. Thus, the conditions in which such phenomena are thought to manifest may not be reproducible for scientific examination. Supernatural phenomena are sometimes referred to as paranormal. The field of study dealing with the supernatural is sometimes called metaphysics or the occult."

Note: a nice home for naturopathy and TCM ideas.

002.b. Dawkins, R. (PhD{evolutionary biology} UO) states in "The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing" (2008; ISBN 0199216800):

 

"what neither Mendel nor anyone else before 1953 knew was that genes themselves are digital, within themselves [...] life is the execution of programs written using a small digital alphabet in a single, universal machine language. This realization was the hammer blow that knocked the last nail in the coffin of vitalism and, by extension, of dualism. The hammer was wielded, with undisguised youthful relish, by James Watson and Francis Crick [p.030...] for me, the greatest achievement of Watson and Crick was to turn genetics from a branch of wet and squishy physiology into a branch of information technology, in the process slaying, as I suggested above, the ghost of vitalism [p.226]."

003. meanwhile:

 

naturopathy and TCM, particularly by way of NCNM, are stuck in the the archaic / premodern nontypification of knowledge that I 've termed "epistemic conflation."  

 

but, we know better -- we're better than such dunderheadedness.

'You Need to Detox with Homeopathic Drops' Because 'Thoughts and Emotions Generate Biochemical Toxins' - Gill, B. (ND NCNM)

here, I cite from a recent article [advertisement!] by ND Gill in the Nelson Daily that sounds like nonsense to me [see 001., below]:

001. Gill, B. (ND NCNM) of Nelson,  British Columbia, Canada states in "It’s Cleansing Time: A Column by Dr. Brenda Gill" [vsc 2011-05-13]:

"after three years of pre-medicine and four years of naturopathic medical school [...] Nelson naturopathic doctor Brenda Gill [...] graduated from NCNM [...and] is licensed by the ANPBC and is a member of the B.C. and Canadian Naturopathic Association in British Columbia [...and uses] nutrition, herbs, supplements, exercise therapy, homeopathy and physical medicine [...] it’s time to start thinking of a rejuvenating cleanse [...] to eliminate the accumulation of toxins that have gathered over the year. External toxicity can be acquired by breathing, eating or having physical contact [(really!)...with] chemicals in the air and water, electromagnetic radiation, on our food, using pharmaceutical drugs and other medications, eating refined, packaged, processed foods, as well as using stimulants and sedatives [(really!)...there's also] internal toxins  [...from] normal everyday functions of our cells [...and] microbes such as intestinal bacteria [...and] our thoughts and emotions also generate biochemical toxins [(oh really!!!)...] cleansing helps to prevent build-up of toxicity and degeneration [...] we detoxify through the respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary, skin, lymph, thought and spiritual systems [(oh really!!!)...] to clear toxins from our body [...including using] homeopathic detoxification drops [...] for those wishing to try a specific cleanse tailored to you, consider an appointment with Dr. Brenda Gill at 352-3150 [...] drbgill@netidea.com."

Note: hmmm.  Some thoughts: a) weird -- a whole list of scientifically actual systems, in terms of physiology, are listed and then tacked onto that list is the supernatural figmentatious, nonchalantly; we know homeopathic drops don't do anything; these ubiquitous toxins are a 'sectarian medical bogey-man' used to get clients in the door; NCNM's knowledge basis is wacko; this is an advertisement; BCNA and CAND are famous for labeling naturopathy "science-based" yet look at this nonsense like the homeopathy within naturopathy that contradicts that "science-based" label, as does this toxin phobia / paranoia / delusion.

Naturopathic Irrationality Microcosm: Ontario's ND Esposito and 'Scientific Science-Ejected' Commerce!

here, I cite from an invitation from Ontario, Canada's ND Esposito to 'get to know naturopathy' [see 001., below]; then, I share with you quite-the-irrationality of the naturopathic -- as I know it well -- a science label falsely placed upon the science-ejected and science-exterior and then used for commerce purposes as gleaned from the ND's web pages [see 002., below]:

001. the Lake Superior News columnist and naturopath Esposito, C. (ND CCNM) writes in "Naturopathic Medicine Week 2011" (2011-05-09) [saved 2011-05-09]:

"today marks the first day of Naturopathic Medicine Week [NMW...] naturopathic doctors across Canada hold free events to talk about their unique, more natural approach to health. The goal is to teach members of their community about natural medicine, health promotion and disease prevention [so get to know them!...] naturopathic doctors are regulated in Ontario, are highly trained primary care providers, are covered by most extended health insurance providers, promote health and address the root cause of disease using natural therapies."

Note: so, NMW. And teaching, as in 'get to know naturopathy'.  Yes, regulated and highly trained, and root cause.  What exactly is the context of that "root cause"?  See below, for there is a claimed context [science] and an actual context [the science-ejected falsely labeled science].

002. now, I'd like to highlight what ND Esposito has written on her own web pages, which I've archived and which are incompatible claims [science is not nonscience; something does not contain what it excludes]:

002.a. the overarching claim / commerce label that naturopathy and its contents is scientific [from my archive]:

002.a.i. in "FAQ: Naturopathic Medicine" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"naturopathic medicine [...] blends modern scientific knowledge with traditional and natural forms of medicine [...and is a] science of disease diagnosis, treatment and prevention [...] the four year program incorporates over 4,500 hours of classroom training in basic medical science courses [and] clinical sciences [...] is naturopathic medicine scientific? Many naturopathic therapies [...] have been validated by scientific research [...] the research supporting naturopathic medicine continues to grow and incorporate new scientific findings [...] training during medical school [...includes] basic and clinical sciences [...] naturopathic physicians [...study] 224.50 [credits...] medical doctors [...study] 186 [the ND superscience claim!]."

Note:  yes, naturopathy blends.  But science isn't a blended kind of knowledge: science does not, for instance, contain the nonscientific -- as naturopathy irrationally claims it does.  And naturopathy claims to be more versed in science than actual medicine -- 'the ND superscience claim'.

002.a.ii. in "Complementary Alternative Medicine: What is Naturopathy?" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"naturopathic medicine [...] blends modern scientific knowledge with traditional and natural forms of medicine [...it's a] science of disease diagnosis, treatment and prevention."

Note: science, science.

002.a.iii. in "Doctor Oath: Naturopathic Doctor's Oath" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"I dedicate myself to the service of humanity as a practitioner of the art and science of naturopathic medicine."

Note: how is humanity served by falsehood?  This same oath obligates naturopaths to vitalism and supernaturalism, and a claim that such is science [the 'ND sectarian creed'].

002.a.iv. in "Energy Medicine" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"energy medicine is the science and the art of optimizing your energies to help your body and mind function at their best."

Note: well, we know that "energy" here is not being used in the scientific science.  Here, it is being misappropriated as a coding for vitalism and spiritism.

002.a.v. in "Homeopathic Consult" [vsc 2011-01-12]:

"one of the most common criticisms of homeopathy is that it is not scientific. However, more and more research continues to supports its efficacy."

Note: no, actually.  This is the exact opposite of what is actually happening.  Naturopathy: the reversal of all values.

002.a.vi. in "Lose Weight Permanently" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"Dr. Esposito offers a cutting edge, scientific approach to weight loss."

Note: more science claimed. 

002.b. the reality that naturopathy and its contents is based upon vitalism [from my archives]:

002.b.i. in "Acupuncture for Neck Pain" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"in acupuncture theory, pain is said to be caused by the stagnation of either qi (energy or life force) [Q = E = LF...] pain that is due to qi stagnation [...] it has the unique ability to regulate the circulation of qi [...] acupuncture works by regulating the flow of qi in meridians [...] that distribute qi through the body [...] the qi tends to get stuck around the point bladder 10 at the nape of the neck."

Note: so, Q = E = LF.

002.b.ii. in "Constitutional Hydrotherapy" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"it is strengthening and healing to the digestive system, helps to normalize circulation, soothes the nervous system, stimulates eliminative and detoxifying processes, and stimulates the vital force [VF]."

Note: ah, ye auld VF.

002.b.iii. in "Acupuncture For PTSD" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"acupuncture works by regulating the flow of qi or life force [Q=LF] in the body. In the case of PTSD, there is often what is called a qi wild condition, in which one's life force / vital energy [LF=VE] have become chaotic, disturbed, or grossly inconsistent. Acupuncture is a powerful way to settle such energetic [E] disturbances and return the body and mind to a state of balance and peace."

Note: so, Q = LF = VE = E.

002.b.iv. in "Acupuncture For Depression" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"acupuncture works by balancing the flow of qi, or internal life force [Q = ILF], in the body. Depression is typically a byproduct of weak qi in the heart or kidneys."

Note: so, Q = ILF.

002.b.v.in "Acupuncture For Stress Management" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"perhaps one of the last truly holistic forms of healthcare remaining on the planet, acupuncture works with the qi (life force) of the body in order to induce a variety of therapeutic effects."

Note: so, Q = LF.

002.b.vi. in "Acupuncture For Immune Health" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"acupuncture works by regulating the flow of qi (life force) [Q = LF] through 14 major meridians on the body. Immune weakness is typically due to deficient qi of the lungs and spleen. When these organs are weak, symptoms such as allergies, diarrhea, fatigue, cough, and recurring infections are commonplace. For these issues, acupuncture points are chosen on the lung and spleen meridians to supplement the qi, thereby strengthening immune function."

Note: so, Q = LF.

002.b.vii. in "Holistic Remedies: The Modalities of Naturopathic Medicine" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"traditional Chinese medicine: Asian medicine is based on the principle of balancing the body's vital energy or chi [VE = C]. The chi of the body is connected in meridians or channels running just under the skin. Energy [E] is balanced through the use of herbs and acupuncture."

Note: so, VE = C = E.

002.b.viii. in "Acupuncture For Fatigue" [vsc 2011-01-13]:

"the majority of patients who complain of fatigue suffer from a deficiency of vital energy (qi) [VE = Q]. Qi is the basic energy [BE] that creates optimal physiological and neurological function. Aside from fatigue, other signs of qi deficiency are diarrhea, pallor, easy bruising, excessive sleep, scanty menses or amenorrhea, frequent urination, low libido, and shortness of breath."

Note: ah, those qi magic beans / unicorn tears.  In Ontario, traditional Chinese medicine is within a naturopathy practitioner's naturopathy scope.  So, VE = Q = BE.

003. overall note:

so, when is what is science-ejected -- a vitalism root-cause figmentation / archaicism codified into North American naturopathy [as supernaturalism is] -- falsely claimed as scientific [as suepernaturalism is]?

Naturopathyland, of course, which to me is regulated nonsense and a kind of commerce that, when licensed / regulated, leaves the consumer with little recourse to remedy the false labels that naturopaths use in their commerce.

naturopathy's supernaturalism is usually fruit I consider too low-hanging to bother blogging about.  Yet, it too is claimed as within "science".  Searching ND Esposito's site with this google.com web search parameter "site:natural-healing-clinic.com spirit" [without the exterior quotes] reveals these pages [all vsc 2011-05-11]:

"Menopause";

and her co-written ebook "How to Thrive in the Modern World: A Layperson's Guide to Chinese Medicine" where we're told "as explained within this e-book, Asian medicine is based on the principle of balancing the body's vital energy or chi [...] the main point when trying to grasp the concept of qi is to consider the possibility that there is an immaterial level of reality that Western science cannot quantify or categorize [...yet, contradictorily] Eastern cultures have long understood what Western science is finally beginning to accept" and that is quite the microcosm of the 'science that ain't science'.