[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically. Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense! Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional." Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]
the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:
the Connecticut Naturopathic Physicians Association;
the State of California Bureau of Naturopathic Medicine;
the State of Idaho;
to Appendix B.03.;
NDs Corwin, Fasullo, Hollon;
NDs Currey, Edwards, Zeiman;
the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine;
University of Minnesota;
to Appendix B.01.c.;
ND Watson; NMD Wazny;
the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:
NDs Anderson, Hegnauer, Jones;
to Appendix I.05.a.;
the Endocrine Association of Naturopathic Physicians;
to Appendix I.02.;
to Appendix I.05.n.;
002. video link and commentary
002.a. ND Rubin (SCNM 1997) states in "Dan Rubin, ND, FABNO, Discusses OncANP":
"I really think that specialty groups [...] is finding its second revolution [...] a rich increase in the amount of naturopathic oncology research that's being done profession-wide [...] we're finding its now much easier to blend true naturopathic core clinical practices with the research."
so, there's oncology, the truly naturopathic, and research.
002.b. naturopathy's CORE:
here's science-ejected vitalism at SCNM as "life force", ND Rubin's alma mater, and within his slideshow.
002.b2. homeopathy, a true core naturopathic practice and THE RESEARCH:
how do you blend homeopathy [and vitalism] with modern scientific research and find SUCCESS? Homeopathy, here it is at SCNM and here it is at ND Rubin's practice (archived 2009), has been utterly scientifically debunked.
if you research enough, you find that naturopathy itself is in this absurd position of 'science labels subset nonscience' now let's do oncology. Rather scary stuff, actually. Oh, here's SCNM's blanket label of 'science subset the essentially naturopathic.'