Saturday, December 13, 2014

Changelog 2014-12-13 and ND Video

here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database.  I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:

[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically.  Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense!  Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional."  Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]

001. added:

the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:

the Foundations of Naturopathic Medicine Project;

ND Kawai;
ND Kreft;

the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:

ND Arce;

NDs Brignall, Gignac, Reilly;

ND Cantanzaro;

ND Marturano;
NDs Marti and McKenzie;
NDs McCullough and Nikiforuk;

ND Persaud;

'naturopathy blends':

NDs Brignall, Gignac, Reilly;

ND Robertson;

002. video link and commentary:

002.a. NCNM, the trunk of the American naturopathy tree, states at their vimeo.com account, in "An Introduction to NCNM's School of Naturopathic Medicine" [uploaded 2014-12-11 apparently; my comments below are in unquoted bold]:
.

.
[tags: #sciencebasedclaim #evidencebasedclaim #homeopathy #supernatural]
.
"School of Naturopathic Medicine [...] NCNM's doctor of naturopathic medicine program [...]";

one of now 8 ND programs in North America, I believe.

"an extension of conventional medicine [...yet] primary care [...] it's medical school [x2...yet there's a bunch of stuff] on top of medicine [...]";

this is quite contradictory. 

"Paul Kalnins ND [...] assistant professor [...] naturopaths are grounded in all the basic medical sciences and that systematic scientific approach [...] the difference is, perhaps, is that naturopathic medicine attempts to integrate the physiological level with the psychological and what we might call the spiritual levels of the human being [...]";

in other words: we are scientific except for the fact that for us anything can be scientific, including the patently science-exterior supernatural.  Ah, 'the epistemic conflation of a school of thought claiming to be scientific.' 

"Nancy Scarlett, ND [...] evidence-informed practice or evidence-based medicine [...] on top of medicine we learn all of our modalities [...including] homeopathy [...]";

ALL the evidence points to homeopathy being empty sugar pills, aka 'on top of medicine we learn stupid stuff.'

"the program is incredibly rigorous [...]";

yeah?  If so, then why is the patently science exterior vitalistic, the heart of naturopathy, falsely labeled at NCNM's own page as able to survive scientific scrutiny? To this day.  Bullshit marches on.
Post a Comment