[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically. Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense! Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional." Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]
the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:
the International Journal of Naturopathic Medicine;
the National University of Health Sciences;
the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:
the Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors;
to Appendix I.02.;
the 'scientific rejection of vitalism':
Cram101 Textbook Reviews;
to Appendix C.07.;
to Appendix G.05.f.;
"Is this an advertisement? Or journalism?
Because there is quite a scientific argument
AGAINST the contents of naturopathy...
that is not represented at all in this piece. -r.c.";
odds and ends:
republished Appendix C.07.;
002. video link and commentary:
this time, not an ND proponent video, but a video skeptical of naturopathy. It's randi.org's "Lecture 6: Naturopathy and Herbal Medicines" (2015) featuring Science-Based Medicine's Dr. Hall. Rather dry but very informative. The description tells us:
"naturopathy is an ill-defined system based on vitalistic mythology; it combines commonsense health and nutrition measures and rational use of a few herbs with a huge variety of unscientific practices and anti-medical double-talk.".
[tags: #DrHall #naturopathyskepticism #scathingrebuke #buyerbeware]