Changelog 2019-09-23 and ND Video

here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database.  I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:

[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically.  Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense!  Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional."  Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]

001. added:

the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:

NDs Alioto and Carswell;

NDs Alter and Alter;

to Appendix B.05.i.a.02.;

NDs Borreson, Burdette, Davis,

Howe, Izold, Munro, Williams;

to Appendix B.05.i.a.05.;

the College of
Naturopathic Medicine UK;
to Appendix B.01.c.; 

ND Dzvonick;
to Appendix B.05.i.bbbb00.;

NDs Jackson, Kaler, Miller,
Riddle, Roberts;
to Appendix B.05.i.c.04.;
 
NDs Moslehi, Redvers, Wright;
to Appendix B.05.id.04.; 

ND Pataracchia;
 ND Pateguana;
ND Peltz;
to Appendix B.05.i.f.;


ND Villalobos;

to Appendix B.05.i.L.;

the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:

Bastyr University;

to Appendix I.01.a2.;

ND Brady;

NDs Bovee, Reilander,Tishenko;

to Appendix I.05.b.;

ND Villalobos;

to Appendix I.05.p.;

002. video link and commentary:

002.a. the bescrubbed Dzvonick, B. (ND SCNM 2011) states in "Licensed Naturopathic Doctor vs. Naturopath What’s the Difference?" [saved 2019-0-22:
.

.

[tags: #NDDzvonick #distinctclaim #medicalclaim]

.

"naturopathic medicine is a unique and distinct system of healthcare [...]";

ah, that claim of distinct.

"graduate from an accredited school and pass NPLEX [...] the national post-doctoral board exam [...] the NPLEX exam [...]";

ah, NPLEX, that falsely categorizes homeopathy a "clinical science."  Ridiculous. 

"licensed naturopathic doctors have standardized medical training [...] as a patient, you want a medical provider [...] you want a medical provider [...] you should seek out a medical provider that is trained properly and regulated by the state or the federal government [...] medical professionals should have your safety in mind [...]";

really.  Naturopaths are not medical, they are naturopathic.  We were told distinct, so which is it?  Either you are medical or you are naturopathic.  If you are medical, like the medical doctors, then you are not distinct.  Medicine is an applied science; naturopathy is pseudoscience. There are distinctions to be made.  But you can't have it both ways, the same but distinct.  Meanwhile, though claimed as distinct, the ND national accreditor states "blends" science and nonscience.  Does not compute.

"the state of California which is my state [...]";

ah, California. Whose consumer protection '.gov' falsely claims naturopathy's homeopathy is "science."

"laws are enacted and enforced to protect your safety [...] follow the laws of that state [...]";

ah, laws.  But what happens when the law explicitly exists to license falsehood / to protect a grift? 

"it's up to you to be an informed consumer [...]";

the irony, oh the irony.

002.b. and see his practice site vitalism here, toward the bottom of the "D"s.