As whim dictates, I shall scribble.
To quote Rose Shapiro from the Guardian article "A Bad Week For Alternative Medicine, "
"could this be the moment when alternative medicine finally gets the reputation it deserves and is seen for what it is -- a massive social and intellectual fraud?"
My basic analytical formula is as follows:
naturopathy claims to be scientific;
naturopathy is based upon vitalism;
naturopathy is based upon supernatural spiritism;
both vitalism and supernatural spiritism are profoundly science-ejected [I will not
cite the scientific pronouncements of such, as they are PROFOUND,
and such is simply FACTUAL].
naturopathy is based upon vitalism;
naturopathy is based upon supernatural spiritism;
both vitalism and supernatural spiritism are profoundly science-ejected [I will not
cite the scientific pronouncements of such, as they are PROFOUND,
and such is simply FACTUAL].
So, in the end, naturopathy is about BULLSHIT:
claiming that that which is PROFOUNDLY science-ejected / non-science-supported is in fact [falsely] scientific.
I have termed this "epistemic conflation," the blending of knowledge types:
the claim that that which is not scientific is simultaneously scientific.
If you bear with me, I shall perpetually expose this CRAPPOLA.
-r.c.
No comments:
Post a Comment