Changelog 2014-10-20 and ND Video

here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database.  I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:

[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically.  Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense!  Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional."  Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]

001. added:

the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:

ND Bailey;

to Appendix B.05.i.a.03.;

ND Bozzo;

to Appendix B.05.i.a.05.;

ND Camp;

ND Campbell;

to Appendix B.05.i.bb01.;

ND Dishman;

to Appendix B.05.i.bbbb00.;

NMD Hamilton;

to Appendix B.05.i.c.02.;

NDs Ingram;

to Appendix B.05.i.c.04.;

NDs Littlefield, Nielsen, Russo, Stadtmauer;

to Appendix B.05.i.d.01.;

ND McCalment-Fuqua;

ND McElgunn;

to Appendix B.05.i.d.02.;

the Naturopathic Gathering';

to Appendix B.02.;

ND Newman-Kovacev;

to Appendix B.05.i.e.;

ND Reimann;

to Appendix B.05.i.h.;

the Texas Association of Naturopathic Doctors;

to Appendix B.03.;

ND Tyler;

to Appendix B.05.i.k.;

ND Wilson;

ND Woodyard;

to Appendix b.05.i.L.;

NDs Brignall, Ker, Rife;

to Appendix B.05.i.a.05.;

the University of Bridgeport;

to Appendix B.01.a.99.;

the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:

ND Bailey;

ND Bozzo;

to Appendix I.05.b.;

ND Campbell;

NDs Chimileski, Sensenig, Robinson;

to Appendix I.05.c.;

NMD Hamilton;

to Appendix I.05.g.;

the Pennsylvania Association of Naturopathic Physicians;

the Texas Association of Naturopathic Doctors;

to Appendix I.03.;

ND Pharis;

to Appendix I.05.m.;

ND Woodyard;to Appendix I.05.p.;

the 'scientific rejection of vitalism':

the National Center for Science Education

to Appendix C.02.;

002. video link and commentary:

002.a. there's this invitation to The 2013 Naturopathic Gathering in "The Naturopathic Gathering- 2013 Re-igniting the Heart of Naturopathic Medicine":
.

.

[#naturopathicgathering #weirdguy #SCNM]

.

which is more of a campus tour of SCNM. The creepy ND student host, I guess, speaks of "the art and science of naturopathic medicine"and "the father's of naturopathic medicine."

002.b. and if you want the essential science-ejected vitalism at the heart of naturopathy, there's The Gathering's "The Vital Force: Theory and Practice" (2010):

"what is the vis medicatrix naturae? [...] Rudolf Steiner [...] we could refer to him for information about the vital force [...] the vital force can be an exciting subject, as well as useful [...] there is no weighty discussion of the vital force [...] in vitalist medicine there has been a tendency to develop ‘laws’ describing the vital force [...] Dr. John M. Scudder [...] taught his students to see the vital force [...] the physiomedicalists observed the action of herbal remedies on the vital force [...] vitalist 'actions' are performed by the vital force in response to the medicine, not by the medicine [...] another insight about the vital force preserved in the physiomedical philosophy derives from a discovery of the eighteenth century [...] the first important lesson of vitalism [...] vitalism is a phenomenon defined by experience [...] vitalism demands increased attention to observation and experience as a basis of practice [...] in vitalism. We in the field have a right and the need to design our own medical and healing paradigm [...] vitalism has both a theoretical and a practical branch [...] laws of vitalism are helpful guidelines for practice [...] probably the best-known law of vitalism is the ‘law of similars' [...] vitalism is an experience of something that lies on the edge of our perceptive abilities and beyond the level of our understanding of the physical world [...] the great advocate of empirical medicine and vitalism in the nineteenth century was Dr. John M. Scudder [...] vitalism is an experience that needs cultivation [...] Bergner [...] records the 'Principles' of their method of vitalism [...] vitalism can influence our knowledge of the properties and dose of medicine [...]  if we wish to be vitalist [...] the holistic, natural, vitalist, and alternative community has both a right and an obligation to formulate its own methods [...] these 'laws' reflect an intuitive, generalized approach to knowledge, characteristic of many vitalist practitioners [...] the fourth lesson of vitalist medicine tells us that disease is suppressible [...] in making a vitalistic analysis of a case [...] a pattern, of disturbed life energy [...] the vis."

forever at Archive.org.  It's footer states "Bastyr University."  Yes, Bastyr that claims this to be "science-based."