Saturday, February 24, 2018

Changelog 2018-02-24 and ND Video

here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database.  I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:

[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically.  Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense!  Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional."  Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]

001. added:

the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:

ND Bablad;
ND Barker;
ND Baugh;

NDs Bloom and Schor;

ND Danby;
NDs Doolittle and Sculley;
NDs Dunlap, Hudson, Johnson and Raydon;
NDs Durben, Knickrehm and Sullivan;
ND Dymond;

ND Hopewell;
ND Hrkal;

the Illinois Association of Naturopathic Physicians;
the Kansas Board of Healing Arts;

ND Kimble;
ND King;
ND Klearman;
to Appendix B.05.i.c.05.;


ND Palacios-Campillay;
 ND Petersburg;
 NDs Petersburg and Reebs;
to Appendix B.05.i.f.;
the University of Kansas Physicians;

the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of: 

ND Chen;

ND Glidden;

the Institute for Natural Medicine;

National University of Health Sciences; 
to Appendix I.01.a6.;

ND Passey;
ND Petley;
ND Pimentel;
to Appendix I.05.m.

the 'scientific rejection of vitalism':

the Korean Journal of Medical History;

'naturopathy blends':

ND Chen;
ND Collings and Ellis;
to Appendix G.05.b.;

ND Jesswein;
ND King;

comments:

@concordmonitor.com, in
(2018-02-16):

"The Naturocrit Podcast and Blog: Oh my, what an apologetic!
Homeopathy is indeed BUNKUM, in sum, when you account
for placebo and regression to the mean, and you rigorously rank
studies and factor in plausibility. Naturopathy's employment of
such, and false labeling of such, well, speaks volumes regarding
the lack of ethics of naturopathy and NDs' shallow understanding.
Such an 'anything goes' mentality obviously gains many
fans, though. -r.c."

odds and ends:

republished Appendix B.05.i.f.;

002. video link and commentary:

002.a. there's the NMI video wherein ND Reebs -- via on his "The Vital ND" account -- interviews ND Petersburg in "Interview: Dr. Nathan Petersburg" [posted 2018-02-15; saved 2018-02-22].
.
.
[tags: #NDReebs #NDPetersburg #vitalism #wetsocks]

and we're told:

"[titles] the Naturopathic Medicine Institute.  Celebrating the healing power of nature. Vitalism lives [and you see ND Sensenig in the opening ND montage who taught me that vitalism at the heart of naturopathy Fall 1998 at UBCNM...]"; 

so, there's science-ejected vitalism, the core of naturopathy.  Vitalism is dead.  Stating that it lives, thought-wise, is to reverse it's status.  Typical for naturopathy to reverse values. 

"[ND Reebs tells us] I'm working towards me vitalist tract certification [...] today we have NMI associate and certified vitalist Dr. Nate Petersburg [a Bastyr ND graduate and Bastyr adjunct faculty...who'll talk about] wet socks [...or] magic socks [...and] the science behind it [...] this is actually physiology, this is science [...] is there anything else you want to say about this amazing treatment or about vitalism before we close [...] the philosophy of vitalism and thinking like a naturopath [...] we can use homeopathy with this treatment [...] it illustrates the vital force [...]"; 

yes, certifying the science-ejected.  And yes, wet socks and homeopathy. Oh, the junk thought

 "[ND P speaks of his patients] and what vitalistic medicine can do for them [...] one thing I love about vitalistic medicine [...] all of it together [...] vitalistic medicine is about [...]";

 ah, vitalism again. While Bastyr claims "science-based."
.
Post a Comment