here, so they survey for the future, but what about their present junk:
001. in the press release "New Study Seeks Input from Naturopaths on Educational Needs and Preferences" [saved; 2020-11-24], we're told:
"in a pioneering research initiative for the naturopathic profession in Australia, researchers are investigating the educational needs and preferences of naturopaths through an online survey [...] led by the National Center for Naturopathic Medicine’s deputy director of education associate professor Matthew Leach and Dr Andrea Bugarcic, course coordinator [...]";
ah, that issue of what naturopaths LEARN. Or prefer to learn!
"associate Professor Leach said that all health professionals, including naturopathic practitioners, have a professional obligation to ensure their knowledge and skills are current [...aka] continuing professional development (CPD) [...]";
well, this is POST GRADUATION. What about what they learn in ND schools in terms of best current knowledge and skills? [see 002.]
002. there's Endeavor College of Natural Health:
and their "Bachelor of Health Science (Naturopathy)" which antithetically contains homeopathy, which Australia's own august research body has determined is junk, and such ideas as vibrational life-force within flower essences;
oh the stupid, it burns! As if science, academic science, is anything you want it to be...
003. my central suggestion:
you need to fix what you are initially teaching and perpetually mislabeling, before you get to the CPD which will just extend that contextual rotten base!
No comments:
Post a Comment