Changelog 2020-12-09 and ND Video

here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database.  I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:

[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically.  Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense!  Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional."  Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]

001. added:

the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:

Bastyr University;

to Appendix B.01.a.09.;

ND Berghamer;

ND Berni;

ND Binder;

NDs Binder and Kelley;

ND Birch;

ND Bitner Castellanos;

to Appendix B.05.i.a.04.;

ND Sensenig;

to Appendix B.o5.i.i.00.;

the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:

Bastyr University;

to Appendix I.01.a2.;

NDs Beades, Clark, Parcell, Parcell, West;

ND Bjorndal;

ND Black;

NDs Blecher and Bréant;

NDs Bogaard and Lazzell;

NDs Boldebuck & Love;

ND Bose;

ND Botterman;

to Appendix I.05.b.;

ND Kiselka;

ND Klein;

ND Krebs;

to Appendix I.05.i.;

the Massachusetts Society of Naturopathic Doctors;

to Appendix I.03.a.7.;

ND Tran;

ND Triboulet;

ND van der Geest;

ND Vazquez;

to Appendix I.05.p.;

the 'scientific rejection of vitalism':

in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences's

"A Non-Metaphysical Evaluation of Vitalism in the Early Twentieth Century":

"[via Chen] the entelechy was not a valid concept,

 because vitalists could neither formulate vital laws [...]

nor offer convincing examples of experimental indeterminism";

[Chen B. (2018). A non-metaphysical evaluation of vitalism

in the early twentieth century. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences,

40(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0221-2] 

002. video link and commentary:

002.a. there's the Vimeo.com video "Tia Miers Naturopathy" (2020):

.

Tia Miers Naturopathy. from Bel Hetho on Vimeo.

[tags: #blending #NDMiers #australiannaturopathy]

"[the irony of an ND blending in a blender should not be lost]";

002.b. and, of course, the ND's practice site in Australia states:

"I do this by utilizing up-to-date research, lab testing and evidence based naturopathic medicine [...] I am a qualified Naturopath (BHSc) [...]";

so the claim is science subset naturopathy.

002.c. while, of course, therein is the page "Food Sensitivity Testing $295.00 AUD" which uses:

"using [a] hair sample the bio-compatibility test identifies what foods are driving digestive symptom’s [sic.]";

which generally is considered a bogus test, by way of the Australian government predominantly funded Special Broadcasting Service's Hanna Marton.  And beware, because that article also states "there is no stringent regulation of unproven diagnostic techniques in Australia."