here, you can't make this sh#t up!
001. Bethany Lindsay of CBC News at cbc.ca reports in "B.C. Naturopath Claims College Can't Stop Him From Selling Fecal Transplants to Treat Autistic Kids":
"a Fraser Valley naturopath has filed a legal action against his professional regulator [here 'college' in the UK style of governing body], alleging it doesn't have the power to stop him from producing fecal transplants in his B.C. lab to administer to autistic children in Mexico";
just with that alone one wonders about: the rights of any patient in terms of internationally mandated experimentation safeguards, the pseudomedicine that is naturopathy which is pseudoregulated, and the continuing internationalization of quackery to skirt legal scrutiny.
002. the overall BC pseudoregulation posture:
the regulator is the College of Naturopathic Physicians of British Columbia. They tell us on their home page "the College protects the public interest by ensuring that naturopathic physicians in British Columbia practice safely, ethically, and competently." Along those lines for example, is it ethical for naturopathy to be based on science-ejected ideas while calling such ideas and methods science? E.g. the professional guild of naturopaths in B.C., the British Columbia Naturopathic Association, states naturopathy is "science-based" including their treatment by way of homeopathy. Enough said: nonsense. A grift within a grift within a... With nobody watching the watchers.
No comments:
Post a Comment