here, musing on something quite obvious that I've been observing for the better part of three decades:
001. the United States Department of Education states in "School Responsibility":
"all school personnel are responsible for reporting fraud, waste, or abuse to the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Inspector General. You can make your report at the OIG Fraud Hotline. The regulations governing this responsibility can be found in the verification regulations under 34 CFR 668.16 [...]";
well, that's pretty explicit. And it's therefore fascinating to know that naturopathy programs are within the Title IV voucher and loan procurement system. For example, the naturopathy degree-granting institution Sonoran University of Health Sciences [science categorical claim] informs us that "most of our students qualify for student loans and assistance, and more than 80% of our students rely on financial aid." That's Title IV. Now, how about some fundamental naturopathic fraud! Such as: the capstone NPLEX licensure exam that such a naturopathic program as the one at Sonoran aims for successful passage of in order to practice naturopathy is stated at Sonoran as containing "both the NPLEX Part I – Biomedical Science and Part II – Core Clinical Science Examination." Then, when you go to the writers of the exam, we're told that within that CCSE Part II is homeopathy, which is quite science-ejected. The homeopathy is but one example of science fraud, a mere symptom of epistemic perversity. How does one account for the conspiracy of silence, the omitted act of fraud reporting, from the financial aid sector within the naturopathy pseudoscience education scheme?
