Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Naturopathy's Scientific Claim - Barker, J.E. (ND SCNM 2001):

here, I cite a recent article that quotes an ND stating that the naturopathic is scientific:

001. the Highlands Ranch Herald reports in "Is There A Naturopathic Doctor in the House?" [2009-04-14]:

"[via Lydick, R. (? ?)] a licensed naturopathic doctor would have to graduate from one of the five residential schools in the United States that offer the degree [ND/NMD]: Bastyr University in Washington, National College of Naturopathic Medicine in Oregon, University of Bridgeport College of Naturopathic Medicine in Connecticut, National University of Health Sciences in Illinois and Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine & Health Sciences in Arizona [...] Dr. Jason Barker [...] has degrees from Colorado State University, Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine & Health Sciences and Oregon Health & Sciences University. He sees naturopathy as an evolving, scientific treatment method. 'We subscribe to the same science as M.D.s,' Barker said";

Yeah, right...
 
[Note: I've lightly reformatted this post 2026-10-24 as I noticed some traffic up-tick.  Apparently the newspaper is till kicking, which is nice to hear in these times of media consolidation. Ironically, Google's Gemini states "It operates as a traditional, fact-based news outlet rather than a hyper-partisan or sensationalist blog."  A search through Google does not result in a hit for the article.  There is a 2009 Archive.org preservation.  As for the ND, he is till in practice in Colorado at a four-ND practice.  And presently he tells us, this 2024-10: "The functional approach, similar to naturopathic medicine, is an integrative, science-based approach to health and healing that focuses on treating the underlying cause of disease" on a page that doesn't include, when he lists naturopathy's principles, "the healing power of nature."  Amazing.  Yet we're also told by the NDs regarding naturopathy's homeopathy, "the energetic imprint of the original substance remains, exerting a subtle but powerful influence on the body’s vital force".  Same as it ever was!]

No comments: