Naturopathic Irrationality Microcosm: New York State's ND Lisanti and the Qi-eesy 'Nature' of Naturopathy...and Scientific Consensus

here, I cite from the web pages of New York State ND Lisanti, wherein science as a commerce-label is placed upon the science-ejected [see 001., below]; then, I cite from a recent source regarding that science-ejected and essential-to-naturopathy vitalistic concept [see 002., below]:

001. Lisanti, F. (ND NCNM) states [for his youtube site, click here]:

001.a. the claim that naturopathy is science in:

001.a.i. in "Definition of Naturopathic Medicine" [needs vsc]:

"naturopathic medicine is a [...] science [...] naturopathic medicine is distinguished by the principles upon which its practice is based. These principles are continually re-examined in the light of scientific advances. The techniques of naturopathic medicine include [...the] scientific and empirical [...NDs are] comprehensively trained in the science of natural healthcare."

Note: science, science, science, science.

001.a.ii. in "Naturopathic Medicine Clinic in Westchester, NY" [vsc 2010-07-30]:

"[in the video] naturopathic doctors cooperate with all other branches of medical science [...in the description] naturopathic medicine is distinguished by the principles upon which its practice is based. These principles are continually re-examined in the light of scientific advances."

Note: yes, that overarching claim that naturopathy is within medical science and filters its contents through scientific scrutiny!

001.a.iii. in "About Classical Chinese Medicine" [vsc 2010-07-30]:

"the time-honored science of classical Chinese medicine (CCM) [...] CCM remains firmly committed to its ancient roots. CCM is a science in its own right."

Note: science, science.

001.a.iv. in "IMS Frequently Asked Questions" [vsc 2010-07-30]:

"naturopathic medicine [...] incorporates scientific advances from medical disciplines throughout the world. Many of the individual therapies used in naturopathic medical practice have been scientifically validated [...] the academic training in medical sciences of naturopathic and conventional physicians is similar."

Note: science, science, science.

001.a.v. in "Does Naturopathic Medicine Work?" [vsc 2010-08-01]:

"does naturopathic medicine work effectively? Naturopathic medicine has its own unique body of knowledge [...] it also incorporates scientific advances [...] many of the individual therapies used in naturopathic medical practice have been scientifically validated especially in the areas of [etc....including] homeopathy, acupuncture [...] the trend is that those naturopathic methods which are tested in well-designed studies are validated."

Note:

001.a.vi. in "The History of Naturopathic Medicine" [vsc 2010-08-01]:

"the naturopathic profession is committed to ongoing scientific research and development [...per] modern scientific methods."

Note:

001.a.vii. in "Natural Allergy Relief" [vsc 2011-05-11],  "No Need to Be Sad When You Struggle With SAD" [vsc 2011-05-11],  "Stop Acne: Water + Diet + CCM + De-Stress = Naturopathic Remedy" [vsc 2011-05-11], "Trials of the Spine: Naturopathic Relief for Minor to Major Back Pain" [vsc 2011-05-10], "Preventing Prostate Pain" [vsc 2011-05-10], in "Infertility: Naturopathic and Acupuncture Approaches" [vsc 2011-05-11], "Naturopathic Medicine and Acupuncture for Headaches" [vsc 2011-05-10], "Experience 21st Century Healthcare, Integrating Cutting Edge Natural Science with Ageless Healing Arts" [vsc 2011-05-10], "Mind Your Metals: Natural Heavy Metal Detoxification" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"[the following smarmy language] it's with the intention of inspiration and integrity that our highly trained doctor creates customized health plans that synergize the best of healing arts with contemporary natural medical science."

Note: many pages states this smarmyness.

001.a.viii. in "Growing by Knowing: Wheat Grass – WOW!" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"a scientist named Charles Schnabel who was looking to perfect chicken’s health first discovered the nutritive powers of wheat grass in the 1930s."

Note: science

001.a.ix. in "Organic Foods and Children: Why Organic Matters the Most for Kids" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"modern organic farming methods that include a wide basis of scientific knowledge and thousands of years of history and experience."

Note: science.

001.a.x. in "Integrative Therapies for Fibromyalgia" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"scientific research indicates that tui na, Chinese massage, and movement therapies like qigong and yoga can reduce pain and improve symptoms in fibromyalgia patients."

Note: science.

001.a.xi. in "Therapies" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"naturopathic treatments [...] this practice is the science, philosophy and art of disease diagnosis, treatment and prevention of illness, using natural therapies and medicines [...] the naturopathic approach to diet and nutrition has been validated in many scientifically based professional journals on nutrition and dietary sciences [...] scientific research is demonstrating that some plant substances have comparable effects to synthetic drugs in clinical situations [...] naturopathic doctors are extensively trained in the art and science of botanical medicine."

Note: more science, science, science, science.

001.a.xii. in "Natural Health and Healing and Your Child" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"perhaps you are among this group, or maybe you are among the growing number of parents who are look to ancient and modern systems for natural healing as they are backed by scientific research."

Note: science.

001.b. the reality that naturopathy is based on the vitalistic / science-ejected:

001.b.i. in "Naturopathic Doctors" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"in short, naturopathic doctors or NDs design treatments that work with your vital force [VF]."

Note: VF.  In short.

001.b.ii. in "Spring Liver Cleansing: The Basics" [vsc 2010-07-31, 2011-05-11]:

"a clean liver is advantageous for healthy regulation of your vital life force (qi) [VLF, Q] and blood as they flow through your body."

Note: VLF = Q.

001.b.iii. in "Cleansing the Liver for Spring" [vsc 2010-07-31]:

"a healthy liver is like a tree swaying in the wind. The tree is flexible because proper nutrients are flowing to all areas of its trunk and branches. If the tree is unhealthy, a strong wind will snap off the branches cut-off from the plant’s life force [LF]."

Note: LF.

001.b.iv. in "Acupuncture as an Alternative Therapy for Pain Management" [vsc 2010-07-31]:

"acupuncture was developed in China 3000 years ago to manage the flow of life force or qi [LF, Q] throughout the body."

Note: LF = Q

001.b.v. in "The History of Acupuncture" [vsc 2011-05-11]:

"acupuncture was and still is a major mode of treatment for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) practitioners. A direct translation from this early text describes acupuncture as putting holes in the body to regulate qi [Q...] what is qi? The literal translation of qi from Chinese means 'breath' just as our English word 'spirit' comes from the Latin 'spiritus' or 'breath.' Qi can be understood as your life force or vital energy [LF, VE]. You can imagine pathways of qi flowing through your body [...] qi operates like [...] water ways [...] the pathways where qi flows are called meridians [...] if qi cannot take its normal course, excess qi will accumulate at the impasse and other areas of your body will not receive the vitality needed to be well. Improper flow manifests as pain or sickness, be it a tummy ache or insomnia [...] acupuncture is used to regulate the flow of qi by inserting thin metal needles at specific points along the meridians where qi flows [...] information gathered during the diagnostic process will inform your acupuncturist where qi is imbalanced. Then, he or she will work along meridians where qi flows to problem area [...e.g.] placement strengthens the flow of qi to the kidney if it is deficient or to drains qi if there is excess [...] to remove blockages of energy [E] and to promote free flow [...] some patients say that they feel a pleasurable sensation when a desired point is located. We call this 'the arrival of the qi'."

Note: Q = LF = VE = E.  Kind of like the arrival of the Tooth Fairy.

 

001.c. tracing it back -- Lisanti has both an ND and an LAc from NCNM -- we can see that his alma mater, NCNM, is the source for this at-odds irrationality of the science-based science-ejected:

 

001.c.1. regarding naturopathy, science, and vitalism, NCNM states:

 

that naturopathy is science and contains nonscience, so: science subset naturopathy subset nonscience.  Wacko.

 

001.c.2. regarding TCM, science, and vitalism [spiritism] NCNM states:

 

is a kind of supernatural science per "the School of Classical Chinese Medicine (CCM) at NCNM [...is] committed to training clinicians capable of tapping the true power of this ancient yet timeless system, which is both a highly sophisticated medical science and a deeply spiritual art form."

 

002. what science says, outright regarding vitalism / supernaturalism:

 

002.a. first, a crowd-sourced product, Wikipedia's article "Supernatural":

 

"the supernatural or supranatural [...] is anything above or beyond what one holds to be natural or exists outside natural law and the observable universe. Science limits its explanations for phenomena to natural explanations, a process known as methodological naturalism, and cannot consider supernatural explanations, as they cannot be investigated empirically. To explain something using natural causes and excluding supernatural causes is to naturalize it. To explain something as resulting from supernatural causes is to supernaturalize it.  Supernatural themes are often associated with paranormal and occult ideas, suggesting the possibility of interaction with the supernatural by means of summoning or trance. In secular societies, religious miracles are typically perceived as supernatural claims, as are spells and curses, divination, and the afterlife. Characteristics for phenomena claimed as supernatural are anomaly, uniqueness, and uncontrollability. Thus, the conditions in which such phenomena are thought to manifest may not be reproducible for scientific examination. Supernatural phenomena are sometimes referred to as paranormal. The field of study dealing with the supernatural is sometimes called metaphysics or the occult."

Note: a nice home for naturopathy and TCM ideas.

002.b. Dawkins, R. (PhD{evolutionary biology} UO) states in "The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing" (2008; ISBN 0199216800):

 

"what neither Mendel nor anyone else before 1953 knew was that genes themselves are digital, within themselves [...] life is the execution of programs written using a small digital alphabet in a single, universal machine language. This realization was the hammer blow that knocked the last nail in the coffin of vitalism and, by extension, of dualism. The hammer was wielded, with undisguised youthful relish, by James Watson and Francis Crick [p.030...] for me, the greatest achievement of Watson and Crick was to turn genetics from a branch of wet and squishy physiology into a branch of information technology, in the process slaying, as I suggested above, the ghost of vitalism [p.226]."

003. meanwhile:

 

naturopathy and TCM, particularly by way of NCNM, are stuck in the the archaic / premodern nontypification of knowledge that I 've termed "epistemic conflation."  

 

but, we know better -- we're better than such dunderheadedness.

"The Run" USA 2011, Naturopathy's False Science Claim, and Its Truly Science-Ejected Vitalistic Absurdity

here, I cite from the web page for the 'PR stunt' that North American naturopathy has planned beginning 74 days from now [see 001., below]:

001. The Run states in "What is Naturopathic Medicine?" [vsc 2011-05-04]:

"naturopathic medicine [NM] represents the 'vitalistic' tradition [VT] of medicine in our Western world.  That is, it treats disease through the stimulation, increase, and support of the person’s inherent healing capacity [PIHC].  These treatments are chosen to work with the patient’s vital force [VF], respecting the natural healing processes of nature [NHPN...] the following principles make naturopathic medicine different from all other medical approaches: [#1] first do no harm, primum no nocere: illness is a purposeful [teleological!] process of the organism. The process of healing includes the generation of symptoms which are, in fact, an expression of the life force [LF] attempting to heal itself.  Therapeutic actions should be complementary to and synergistic with this healing process [THP].  The physician’s actions can support or antagonize the actions of the vis mediatrix naturae,  the healing power of nature [VMN-HPN...#2] the healing power of nature, vis mediatrix [sp., medicatrix] naturae [VMN-HPN]: the body has an inherent ability to establish, maintain, and restore health.  The healing process is ordered and intelligent [teleological!];  nature heals through the response of the life force [LF].  The physician’s role is to facilitate this process [TP...this] naturopathic philosophy serves as the basis for naturopathic practice [...] these are based on the observation of health and disease.  This observation process involves the use of modern scientific methodologies and language [a FALSE and ABSURD claim that science-eject vitalism SURVIVES scientific scrutiny as 'objective scientific fact' -- the scientifically observed science ejected is THE BASIS of naturopathy]."

Note: so, NM = VT = PIHC = VF = NHPN = LF = THP = VMN-HPN = LF = TP.  By the way, the page states that within naturoapthy is homeopathy and that homeopathy is "powerful" and "effective" and that for NDs / NMDs "homeopathy is a central part of our comprehensive training".  Sponsors include: supplement companies, the Washington Association of Naturopathic Physicians, the National College of Natural Medicine, the University of Bridgeport, Bastyr University, and American Association of Naturopathic Physicians and Naturopathic Doctor News and Review.

NMD Olmsted - The Holographic Physician's Wish-Granting Stargate-Creating Quantum Vortex Experience via Andromedan Holographic Projectors

here, I cite the VERY pseudoscientific and loony:

001. NMD Olmsted (NMD SCNM) states:

001.a. at Youtube in "Dr. Valerie Olmsted" [vsc 2011-04-03]:

"hello, I'm Dr. Valerie Olmsted.  Instead of my official title of naturopathic physician, I like to refer to myself as the holographic physician [...] a quantum scientist [...] a science geek [...] I live in Sedona, Arizona but I travel the US and Canada sharing the quantum vortex with those who which to experience it [...] I'm a licensed naturopathic physician [...I'm also an] energy healer [...and] ordained minister [...] altogether, I have over 30 years in the medical field [...regarding] quantum physics [...] what I've found is that this is the real science.  This explains life and metaphysics [...and she speaks of] the amazing healing and manifesting powers [wish-granting] of the quantum vortex [...] I have the honor of being the one who brings the quantum vortex to the people so they can heal their bodies, minds and spirits."

Note: so we got the reference to a doctorate in naturopathy and title of naturopathic physician, a science expertise claim, a healing and wish-granting claim, a title of holographic physician, and supernaturalism.

001.b. at Youtube in "The Quantum Vortex Explained" [vsc 2011-04-03]:

"there's a lot of ways that we could use to describe the quantum vortex experience [...with] no math and very little science [I'll say!...] for the sake of simplicity, lets just say it's a connection to higher consciousness that we connect to consciously [...] the quantum vortex is created by combining sacred geometry with lasers, gemstones and metallic devices [...] when you go in, you are going to see many colored lights reflected off the jewels on the equipment [...] it's pretty and twinkly [...with] relaxing music [...] sometimes, we use healing symbols on the walls to add other energy frequencies to the healing space [...] once you are within the beam as we call it, you'll feel the intense relaxation.  You are going to feel the energy field created by the quantum vortex [...] the interesting thing about the quantum vortex experience is the swiftness with which the things you want appear in your life [wish-granting...] we hear from just about everyone that they're thrilled with the manifestation [wish-granting] that the vortex creates [...] we've had many people tell us about visitors to their sessions both private and group such as angels, guides, orbs, Jesus, other deities, and also ETs and beings from other realms.  Interdimensionals, alternate realities.  Often people have told us these visitors come home with them and continue to work on them for some weeks after their vortex experience. It's all good stuff.  Don't worry."

Note: yes, that is right, extra-terrestrials and kind will supposedly BUG YOU after the session for a while.  That doesn't sound very relaxing to me.  It sounds like psychosis!  Again, promised healing and wish-granting.

001.c. at her own web page in "About Dr. Valerie" [vsc 2011-04-03]:

"Dr. Valerie Olmsted, NMD is a naturopathic medical doctor hailing from Sedona, Arizona, USA [...] she graduated with her doctorate from Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine in 1999 [...she's on] the BBS Radio Network [...hosting] 'The Enlightened Medicine Show' [how ironic!...] one of the guests [...] was none other than Dr. Fred Bell [...who] has been working on various quantum tools for healing and attunement [...] he has been contacted by various types of 'extra-terrestrial' beings who have helped him develop this technology before its time [...] Dr Bell realized that he had stumbled on a new exciting science within the quantum holographic world [what the hell is that?...] Dr. Valerie [...has] purchased several of his 'quantum vortex projector' units, and began experimentation [...] exploring their vast potential [...] her input has been critical in searching for the boundaries of this new found science [...now] she gets to join her two passions together, helping people, and science [...] she got the message that she was to take the projectors on the road, to allow people from all over to receive the amazing benefits of being 'in the beam'."

Note: wow!  I assume the ETs told her to tour!  Again, a science claim, and a healing claim by a healing beam, to be precise.  The Enlightenment embraced REASON.  This, to me, is beliefy weirdness in a lab coat.

001.d. at her own web page in "Welcome to the Quantum Vortex Experience!" [vsc 2011-04-03]:

"the quantum vortex experience is one of the most powerful new technologies for personal growth and powerful life changes.  It creates what is called a 'zero-point' field, which enables you to enter the perfect conditions for release and manifestation.  By 'entering the beam' of the vortex, you can make statements and bring your desires into reality (like 'The Secret') via a direct connection to your higher self and the universe."

Note: more wish-granting promises, and pseudoscientific mechanisms / premises.

001.e. at her own web page in "What is the Quantum Vortex Experience?" [vsc 2011-04-03]:

"what I’m about to tell you [...] involves quantum physics and quantum mechanics [...I have] quantum physics devices that [...] create a zero-point field with scalar energy [...] sort of like a two-way radio into other dimensions and galaxies [...] what if someone figured out how to get you the maximum benefit from such a device, with the minimum amount of work? [...] the quantum vortex experience is participatory: you show up, with your list of things you want to release from your life and things you want to make manifest in your life. We then open the StarGate [...] photos [taken] have orbs, faces, objects twirling in space, ET's, and alternate realities that show up on the cameras [...] the devices are Andromedan holographic projectors made by Dr. Fred Bell [...] when set up in the proper alignment, the devices open StarGates to other galaxies and dimensions [...] we create a portal and ring the doorbell of the beings we are wishing to connect with [...] occasionally, some of the dark beings try to show up, but are prevented from entering by the light beings [...] the portals are administered by the Andromedans, with Pleiadians, Arcturians, Iagerians, Sirians, Cetaceans, and many other beings showing up, plus angels, ascended masters, fairies, and who knows what else."

Note: I'm totally speechless.  In all fairness, this stuff is no more irrational than naturopathy's claim that within science is the science-ejected, and that within professionalism is deception and opacity / manipulation.

Steven Salzberg on TCM Journals: Unproven Superstitions Falsely Labeled Science

here, I cite from a recent Forbes blog post by Steven Salzberg regarding the actual nonscientific context of 'scientifically contextually published' TCM [see 001., below]:

001. Steven Salzberg writes in "Chinese Medicine Infiltrates Scientific Publishing" (2011-03-28)[saved 2011-03-28]:

"Chinese medicine has its own journal [...a] pseudoscience journal [actually...of] journals that promote anti-scientific theories and otherwise muddy the literature [...] published by BioMed Central, a large scientific publisher [...owned by] Springer Science [...covering] 'acupuncture, tui-na, qi-qong, tai chi quan, energy research' and other nonsense [...based on] mysterious energy fields in the body [...] for those with a high tolerance for quackery [...] TCM is a grab-bag of superstitious practices taken from Chinese history [...] what is this doing in a scientific journal? [...] using the term 'medicine' to describe Qi-gong, acupuncture, and 'energy research' is, to put it bluntly, nonsense [...] corporate leaders seem to care more about expanding their stable than about maintaining the integrity of science. Chinese medicine simply does not belong in the company of respectable scientific journals [hear, hear...] forming a scientific journal whose goal is to validate antiquated, unproven superstitions is simply not science."

Note: naturopathy, too, is published by Elsevier as "science".  And TCM is a subset of naturopathy, which calls itself, overall, a branch of medical science while fundamentally based on the science-ejected.  This is 2011, and STILL you have less rights and protections as an educational consumer in terms of unfair commerce than someone on a used car lot.

A 2011 Push For Naturopathy in Iowa, Where It is Presently Illegal

here, I briefly cite from an article in Iowa regarding attempted 2011 naturopathy licensure:

001. Ken Black reports for the Times-Republican in "Naturopathic Medicine Could Come to Iowa" [saved 2011-02-27](2011-02-27):

"Dr. Jessica Curcio, president of the Iowa Naturopathic Physicians Association [INPA], is spearheading the effort to get naturopathic medicine recognized as a legal form of medicine in Iowa [...presently] it is not allowed [...in] Iowa [...] 'I really think we'll see floor action on this soon' [she says...] naturopathic physicians are experts [...] Sen. Steve Sodders, D-State Center [...says] 'if you look at their training as it relates to those other medical trainings, they are very similar'."

Note: what does it take to get beyond all this shallowness?  What kind of expertise is 'naturopathic knowledge muddle'?  I don't get it: naturopathy falsely labels as science that which is hugely science-exterior.  That doesn't seem similar to medical training at all.  It doesn't seem legal, actually.

Naturopathy's Dental Amalgam Mercury Cultism - Ontario's Stonetree Clinic vs. NCAHF

here, I excerpt from a recent blog post by NDs Gignac and Sonnenburg regarding the supposed dangers of the 'toxins' from dental mercury amalgam fillings [see 001., below]; then, I cite their 'science claim' and colon hydrotherapy crap [see 002., below]; then, some actual expertise via NCAHF and Wikipedia [see 003., below]; finally, I remind you of  'the essentially naturopathic' figmentatious [see 004., below]:

001. the blog page of Gignac, T. (ND CCNM) and Sonnenburg, L. (ND CCNM) states in "Mercury Amalgams: How Safe are Tooth Fillings?" [vsc 2011-01-14]:

"dental amalgams deliver a daily dose of mercury to the body [...and] are the single largest source of mercury exposure for the average Canadian. The link between mercury from tooth fillings and actual health problems, though, has been the subject of much debate [hmmm, really?...] in 2009, the FDA ruled mercury wasn’t harmful, but last month an FDA advisory panel urged them to reconsider. It would appear that the tide is slowly turning [hmmm, really?...] if you’re concerned about your fillings, we recommend a three step process: test for elevated levels of mercury in the body [testing! $$$; maybe by the 'provocation method' known to create false positive results]; help remove the mercury through IV chelation, supplementation, and inhalation treatments [treatment!$$$]; referral to a specialist for safe amalgam removal and replacement [treatment! $$$]. To learn more about testing for mercury and other toxins, contact the office [...for] a complimentary appointment."

Note: so, they're quite willing to entertain 'concerns', test -- and I'm going to hazard that the testing method is the quite deceptive 'provocation method' --  and treat. Such a detoxification regime may be so lucrative that the initial visit is free. But, what do experts say, as opposed to ideologues, about supposed dental amalgam mercury [see below]?

002. the NDs also state in "Frequently Asked Questions" [vsc 2011-01-14]:

"is naturopathy scientific? There is an enormous body of evidence supporting naturopathic medicine, [...] you’ll be surprised to discover just how practical and scientific our work at the clinic is. We rely a great deal on lab testing and logical, scientific analysis."

Note: so, we're led to believe that this is science, overall -- enormously!!!

Yes, their clinic is so ENORMOUSLY scientific that they do colonic cleanses on site, about which we're told:

"colon hydrotherapy (also called colonics, colon cleanses, or colonic irrigation) is a hygienic cleansing of the colon (large intestine) with filtered, temperature regulated water [...] it is a painless, safe and effective method of removing dried fecal matter and restoring the colon to optimal health and function, bringing with it a sense of well being [...] the therapy is useful for many different reasons, including restoring and/or regulating bowel functions and routines, reducing toxins built up in the colon and helping to detoxify the liver and lymphatic system [...] an ineffective digestive system makes it difficult for your kidneys and liver to properly flush toxins, which in turn can lead to a variety of health complaints [...their] state-of-the-art colon hydrotherapy suite in our Collingwood Naturopathic clinic offers regular treatment times."

But, these claims are bunk in terms of medical science.  Even Wikipedia's article states:

"the rationale for colon cleansing is the concept of 'auto-intoxication', the idea that food enters the intestine and rots. The ancient Egyptians believed that toxins formed as a result of decomposition within the intestines, and moved from there into the circulatory system causing fever and the development of pus. The ancient Greeks adopted and expanded the idea, applying their belief in the four humours [...] auto-intoxication enjoyed some favor in the medical community from the late nineteenth to the early twentieth century, but was discarded as advances in science failed to support its claims [...] despite this, 'auto-intoxication' persists in the public imagination. The practice of colon cleansing has undergone a resurgence in the alternative medical community, supported by testimonials and anecdotal evidence and promoted by manufacturers of colon cleansing products."

003. the National Council Against Health Fraud states in "Consumer Health Digest #10-52: False Dental Amalgam Toxicity Claims Slammed Again" (2010-12-30):

"a study of 56 patients who claimed to have symptoms caused by mercury in their amalgam fillings has found that none of the patients had significant levels of mercury in their blood or urine [...] 20 of the patients has previously been previously diagnosed with mercury toxicity by 'commercial practitioners using unconventional testing panels' [likely provocative testing...] a recent review by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs concluded: 'studies continue to support the position that dental amalgam is a safe restorative option for both children and adults' [...] during the past few weeks, unjustified scare headlines have been generated by an anti-amalgam campaign that involved testimony at an FDA hearing [...] Robert S. Baratz, M.D., D.D.S., Ph.D. noted: 'the simple truth is that there is no significant risk because amalgam fillings are safe [...] the promotion of anti-amalgamism is regularly linked with fringe practitioners, people with financial interests in promoting something else [like naturopathy!], and pseudoscience [like naturopathy!...] the anti-amalgamists resemble more a religious cult [like naturopathy!] than a group of serious, objective scientists searching for the truth.'"

Note: oh snap!  Yes, it's a bunch of crap.

004. 'the essentially naturopathic' context and science:

[to get to this, since these Ontario NDs don't apparently explain the naturopathic context on their web site in any manner, we need to go to the OAND, the Ontario Association of Naturopathic Doctors]:

004.a. OAND on vitalism-supernaturalism, the primary figmentatious context of naturopathy:

004.a1. in their publication Natural Path (Winter 2002) [vsc 2011-01-14]:

"Homeopathy: An ND's Perspective [by] Zorana Rose, BA in OT, ND [...] the remedy then stimulates the body to heal itself. It does this by supporting the 'vital force' of the person. Hanhemann described this vital force as the energy that animates all living things [...] when an imbalance occurs (Hahnemann refers to this as a disturbance in the person's vital force), symptoms, signs or susceptibilities appear. A homeopath will prescribe a remedy that will help the body return to balance [...] Dr. Samuel Hahnemann, a German physician and chemist, discovered and developed Homeopathy into a science [...] has homeopathy been scientifically proven? The short answer is yes."

Note: so, there is the vitalism context of naturopathy, there as it relates to their homeopathy.  Yes, that's an overarching label of science placed upon homeopathy, that is truly FALSE.

004.a2. in their publication The Pulse (Summer-2008) [vsc 2011-01-14]:

"Where's the Healing? by Paul Epstein, ND [...] being 'holistic' can go beyond finding the right supplement, botanical extract, homeopathic remedy or [acupuncture] point. It is being able to contact the deeper essence of a person, whether you call it the spirit, soul or vital force. In contacting this deeper essence, the holistic physician is to tap the person’s true source of healing."

Note: it's rare to get naturopathy's overall context of vitalistic supernaturalism so transparently communicated, as the above two definitions from OAND do, when amalgamated [a ha ha ha!].

For instance, OAND does say, quite opaquely otherwheres:

"the strategic approach to augment our body’s own innate defenses against metastasis is fully in line with our philosophy and the vis medicatrix naturae."

004.b. in all this, remember, "Danger, Will Robinson!":

because, believe it or not, OAND is not averse to falsely labeling naturopathy overall "science based."

Naturopathic.ca.gov Decrees Nonsense [Homeopathy] is Now Science

here, I cite from the results of a Google.com web search ["site:naturopathic.ca.gov homeopathy", without the quotes] of the web site of the State of California, which falsely decrees that homeopathy is science [see 001., below]; then, I cite from the 2010 Evidence Check that FURTHER damned homeopathy into archaic, science-rejected, superstitious oblivion [see 002., below]:

001. the State of California states, as an extension of their Department of Consumer Affairs no less [how absurdly ironic!]

001.a. regarding homeopathy:

001.a1. in "Naturopathic Formulary Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes: December 11, 2005" [vsc 2010-12-28]:

"Chairman Wannigman [...] requested an addition of 'homeopathics would be classified as a general group' [...and] discussed the opinion that was distributed by the Department of Consumer Affairs from Norine Marks regarding questions raised from the committee on homeopathy and by the Advisory Council [...] there is also the continued restriction of drugs that are not considered medications available to lay homeopathic persons [...] homeopathic medicine: homeopathic pharmacies wanted clarification [...] the original language said that naturopathic doctors may prescribe homeopathy [...] Norine Marks was asked to discuss the creation of language that could define homeopathic medicines in a sense broader that those listed in the former homeopathic pharmacopoeia [...] the medications that are approved at homeopathic allowable potency and constructed specifically for homeopathic use should be made available to a naturopath."

Note: so, they've spent quite an amount of verbiage / ink / electrons on homeopathy.  It is essential to naturopathy.  The school I went to in fact quite falsely labels naturopathy's required homeopathy (see http://www.bridgeport.edu/academics/graduate/naturo/programreqs) as science (see http://www.bridgeport.edu/academics/healthsciences/).

001.a2.  in "Findings and Recommendations Regarding the Practice of Naturopathic Childbirth Attendance" [vsc 2010-12-28]:

"in order to qualify for licensure, NDs must take and pass Parts I and II of the Naturopathic Physicians Licensing Examination (NPLEX) [...] Part I of the NPLEX, the Basic Science Examinations [...] students are encouraged to take this portion of the examination as soon as they finish their basic science coursework [...] Part II, the Core Clinical Science Examination [...] beginning with the August 2007 NPLEX Exam administration, the Part II - Core Clinical Science Series will be integrated into a single examination that will include homeopathy."

Note: yes, that's science subset homeopathy.  NPLEX's document "Bulletin of Information and Application for the NPLEX Part II - Clinical Science Examination - February 2011 NPLEX Administration" [vsc 2010-12-28] tells us, similarly:

"the NPLEX Part II - Core Clinical Science Examination [...] covers the topics of diagnosis physical, clinical, and lab, diagnostic imaging, botanical medicine, nutrition, physical medicine, homeopathy [etc.]."

The root "scien" appears at least 63 times on my ocr pdfof their nonsearchable pdf: science, science, science.

001.a3. in "Findings and Recommendations Regarding Minor Office Procedures" [vsc 2010-12-28]:

"an applicant for licensure must have graduated from a naturopathic medical education program accredited by the Council on Naturopathic Medical Education (CNME). For accreditation, the schools must meet the following minimum requirements [...] program requirements for its degree or diploma of a minimum of 4,100 total hours in basic and clinical sciences [etc....] Part I of the NPLEX, the Basic Science Examinations [...] Part II, the Core Clinical Science Examination [...] beginning with the August 2007 NPLEX Exam administration, the Part II - Core Clinical Science Series will be integrated into a single examination that will include homeopathy."

Note: so, homeo. within science again.

001.a4. in "Findings and Recommendations Regarding the Practice of Naturopathic Childbirth Attendance" [vsc 2010-12-28]:

"an applicant for licensure must have graduated from a naturopathic medical education program accredited by the Council on Naturopathic Medical Education (CNME). For accreditation, the schools must meet the following minimum requirements [...] program requirements for its degree or diploma of a minimum of 4,100 total hours in basic and clinical sciences [etc....] the art and science of midwifery [...] related behavioral and social sciences [...] in order to qualify for licensure, NDs must take and pass Parts I and II of the Naturopathic Physicians Licensing Examination (NPLEX) [...] Part I of the NPLEX, the Basic Science Examinations [...] students are encouraged to take this portion of the examination as soon as they finish their basic science coursework [...] Part II, the Core Clinical Science Examination [...] beginning with the August 2007 NPLEX Exam administration, the Part II - Core Clinical Science Series will be integrated into a single examination that will include homeopathy."

Note: AGAIN.

001.b. regarding naturopathy as scientific, overall [and I suggest this Google.com web search, "site:naturopathic.ca.gov "objective observation", without the quotes] the State of California states:

001.b1. in "Bureau of Naturopathic Medicine - A Bureau of the California Department of Consumer Affairs - Findings and Recommendations Regarding the Prescribing and Furnishing Authority of a Naturopathic Doctor" [vsc 2010-12-28]:

"the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians (AANP) [...has established] a consensus definition of naturopathic medicine for the modern era. The definition, unanimously adopted by the AANP’s House of Delegates in 1989, focused on the guiding naturopathic principles and philosophy rather than specific therapeutic modalities or treatments. The definition reads: 'naturopathic medicine is a distinct system of primary health care - an art, science, philosophy and practice of diagnosis, treatment and prevention of illness. Naturopathic medicine is distinguished by the principles which underlie and determine its practice [like vitalism and supernaturalism, which are science-ejected!]. These principles are based upon the objective observation of the nature of health and disease, and are continually reexamined in the light of scientific advances. Methods used are consistent with these principles."

Note: so now homeo. is within science [and the supernatural], again again again.  Also, we're told in that same document:

"in order to qualify for licensure, NDs must take and pass Parts I and II of the Naturopathic Physicians Licensing Examination (NPLEX) [...] Part I of the NPLEX, the Basic Science Examinations [...] students are encouraged to take this portion of the examination as soon as they finish their basic science coursework[...] a student must pass Part I of the exam before being allowed to sit for Part II. Part II, the Core Clinical Science Examination [...] beginning with the August 2007 NPLEX Exam administration, the Part II - Core Clinical Science Series will be integrated into a single examination that will include homeopathy."

Note: again again again again..

Additionally, we're also told:

"as taught in naturopathic medical schools, the therapeutic hierarchy is a guideline to applying the modalities of naturopathic medicine [...#2] stimulate the self-healing mechanisms (vis medicatrix naturae) [SHM-VMN, coded vitalism]."

Note: the current California Naturopathic Doctors Association was once the California Association of Naturopathic Physicians.  Digging back to CANP's earliest archived page wherein CANP supposedly defines naturopathy, "What is Naturopathic Medicine?" (c2000-12-15) [vsc 2010-12-28], we're told:

"naturopathic physicians are guided by six principles: first, do No harm; the healing power of nature [HPN, coded vitalism]; find the cause; treat the whole person; preventive medicine; and, doctor as teacher. This set of principles, emphasized throughout a naturopathic physician's training, outlines the philosophy guiding the naturopathic approach to health and healing and forms the foundation of this distinct health care practice [...] the concept of vis medicatrix naturae, 'the healing power of nature' [VMN-HPN, coded vitalism]. This concept has long been at the core of medicine in many cultures around the world and remains one of the central themes of naturopathic philosophy today."

I find it ethically appalling that even in 2000, California AANP-AANMC-FNPLA type naturopathy was not being transparent concerning SHM-VMN-HPN -- their science-ejected vitalistic context.

Even in 2003, CANP postured a "science" basis for 'it all' in "California Senate Casts Historic and Decisive Vote In Favor of Licensing Naturopathic Doctors" (2003-08-10)[vsc 2010-12-28] stating:

"naturopathic medicine [...] focuses on [the] science-based [...] the four years of naturopathic medical education include basic medical sciences."

002. what science says:

002.a. regarding homeopathy, the year 2009, particularly from the UK, the document "Evidence Check 2 - Homeopathy" says it all:

"the Government should stop allowing the funding of homeopathy on the NHS. We conclude that placebos should not be routinely prescribed on the NHS."

002.b. about the 'naturopathic principles' that define naturopathy's context, let my quote from ND Lloyd's "The History of Naturopathic Medicine: A Canadian Perspective" (2009, ISBN 9781552787786) that I am holding in my hands:

"overview of the naturopathic approach: vitalism refers to the view that life is governed by forces beyond the physical [therein, the metaphysical...] vitalism is associated with concepts of spirit or soul and the term vitality refers to the inherent capacity of an organism to live, grow, develop and heal [p.239]."

Note: and then I will quote from another book I'm holding in my hands, Richard Dawkins's "The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing" (2009, ISBN 9780199216819) which states:

"for me, the greatest achievement of Watson and Crick was to turn genetics from a branch of wet and squishy physiology into a branch of information technology, in the process slaying, as suggested above, the ghost of vitalism."

So, basically, science has no need to resort to spirits or souls.  Evidence, naturalistic and physicalistic evidence, doesn't not require such nonparsimonious metaphysical fabrications / figmentations.

So not only is something within naturopathy falsely labeled, naturopathy's entire context is absurd: that the scientific is the science-exterior.

AZ Licensed ND Underwood Accused of Child Molestation, and How NMDs/NDs Molest Science

here, I cite from a recent account of an naturopath in Arizona accused of child molestation [see 001., below]; then, I detail how naturopathy molests science [see 002., below]:

001. AZCentral.com reports from the Arizona Republic in "Videotape Shows Anthem Doctor Showering With Boy, Authorities Say" (2010-12-10):

"[as reported by Brennan Smith] authorities have discovered a videotape they believe shows an Anthem [naturopathic!] doctor showering with a 9-year-old boy he is accused of molesting, according to Lt. Brian Lee of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office [...] Don Underwood [is] a naturopathic doctor who is accused of molesting a former employee's son [...] Underwood faces seven counts of child molestation and three counts of sexual conduct with a minor in the case of the 9-year-old, who told his mother that Underwood molested him on several occasions [...] authorities said the boy provided 'very descriptive and graphic information implicating Underwood in several felony molestation charges' [...] Dr. Craig Runbeck, executive director of the Arizona Naturopathic Physicians Medical Board [more on them below], said he has not received Underwood's police report but will pursue a summary suspension of Underwood's license if his conduct is deemed harmful to his patients [huh? how about society at-large?]."

Note: so, that concerns the horrid [alleged / accused] sexual molestation of a child.

002. naturopathy's molestation of science:

002.a the State of Arizona Naturopathic Physicians Medical Board states:

002.a1. at their home page:

"mission statement: the primary duty of the Board is to protect the public through the regulation of the practice of naturopathic medicine."

Note: quite a noble goal.

002.a2. that its board members are:

"Catherine Lynn Walker NMD, Chairman; Daniel Rubin ND [ND SCNM 1997], Vice Chairman; Mr. Evan Zang, Secretary/Treasurer; Renee Waldman NMD, Physician Member; Mr. Kip Micuda JD, Public Member; Ms. Linda Barron, Public Member; Dr. Bruce Sadelik, Physician Member."

Note: so, lets look at ND Rubin.

002.b. ND Rubin as a microcosm of naturopathic science molestation:

002.b1. ND Rubin [bio.and CV here, here, here] states naturopathy's essential and required science-ejected premise, vitalism, in "Naturopathic Medicine: Ways, Means and Practicality" [archived from his http://www.naturopathicspecialists.com/uploads/Naturopathic_Medicine_What_is_it.pdf, vsc 2010-03-06]:

"[naturopathy's essential] precepts. Vis medicatrix naturae [slide 010...] vis medicatrix naturae. Vis = energy, strength or force [...] the body possesses the inherent ability to restore health. The physician's role is to facilitate this process with the aid of natural nontoxic therapies [slide 011...] the vital force. This describes the energy essential for life, the innate life principle, or the inherent power within every living organism. Naturopathic doctors seek to support the vital force [slide 012]."

Note: such vitalism is hugely science-ejected AS A CONTEXT.  The slideshow states "Presented by Daniel Rubin, N.D. [at the] University of Illinois Medical Campus Chicago, IL [on] March 15, 2006."  I've had it in my archives for years.

002.b2. yet, ND Rubin claims that naturopathy is scientific while nonscientific in "Naturopathic Oncology: An Emerging Discipline" [vsc 2010-12-10] (2005-08):

"naturopathic medicine is a distinct system of health care and distinguished by the principles that underlie and determine its practice [...which] are based on objective observation of the nature of health and disease [...and] continually reexamined in the light of scientific advances [...its] methods used are consistent with these principles [...] such principles are vis medicatrix naturae (the healing power of nature) [(VMN-HPN a.k.a. coded vitalism!)...and speaks of] the philosophy, science and practice of naturopathic oncology [...] to attend naturopathic medical school, applicants complete the same science premedical requirements required by conventional schools of medicine. Naturopathic medical schools are 4-year,  graduate level, federally and regionally accredited institutions. The first two years are comparable to conventional medical school, emphasizing basic medical sciences. The second  two years concentrate on clinical sciences, focusing on natural therapeutics [...] the Naturopathic Physicians Licensing Examination [NPLEX] is the standard used by all licensing jurisdictions for naturopathic physicians in North America. It includes five basic science exams -- anatomy, physiology, pathology, biochemistry, microbiology and immunology -- taken after the first two years of naturopathic medical school. The clinical science examinations are taken following graduation and include [...] homeopathy."

Note: science, science, science.  And that label is placed upon naturopathy's VMN-HPN, and homeopathy.  This does not compute: something isn't equal to what it is excluded from!

Currently, isn't it interesting that at ND Rubin's page "Practice Philosophy" we aren't told of this vitalism-science conflation-irrationality [indistinction!].  Yet, ND Rubin does state [and I think it is quite ironic actually, and would be even absurdly funny, if this wasn't such a huge load of ONCOLOGY mischief / horror]:

a reverence for patient's "humanity and dignity";

their "becoming empowered";

"I believe that each individual with cancer should be treated as a person first, and a patient second";

"the best treatment approach";

"the underlying";

"a type of healing that transcends any type of physical or molecular mechanistical medicine";

"a good treatment plan always begins with the education of both the person undergoing the treatment";

"I believe that when the basis of a treatment plan, as well as the basis of cancer is well understood, one will be in a better position to decide if such a treatment is truly appropriate for them";

"the purpose of this writing is to generate understanding though education";

"one needs to understand the fundamentals of the situation".

Yes, the irony is TRULY killing me.

003. overall note:

so, a member of the Board of NDs/NMDs in Arizona is actually A MENACE [molesters are menaces too] to the public's understanding of science since science is claimed absurdly as equal to the actually science-ejected, and therein science is sadly HUGELY molested [of course, in a much differently-heinous context than child molestation].

I could go on and on.

Obviously, if you understand, in the words of ND Rubin, "the fundamentals of the situation" regarding naturopathy and science / their false self-labels,

naturopathy is an absurd pseudoscience doing quite scary things in quite serious situations and with a quite misleading mannerism / M.O.

Ah, the most extreme reversal of values. 'Under lying' indeed.

Kansas Naturopathic Medicine - KSBHA Falsely Poses What's Science-Ejected As Science

here, I cite from the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts [KSBHA] which absurdly labels naturopathy's homeopathy "clinical science" [see 001., below]; then, I muse on 'what such pseudoscience-by-legislation accomplishes' [see 002., below]:

001. the KSBHA states in "Kansas Statutes Annotated and Kansas Administrative Regulations Relating to the Practice of Naturopathy" [vsc 2010-11-26]:

"the board shall issue a registration as a naturopathic doctor to an individual who prior to the effective date of this act (1) graduated from a school of naturopathy that required four years of attendance and was at the time of such individual’s graduation accredited or a candidate for accreditation by the board approved accrediting body, (2) passed an examination approved by the board covering appropriate naturopathic subjects including basic and clinical sciences [...] K.A.R .100-72-5. Examinations: (a) Each applicant for registration by examination as a naturopathic doctor shall submit proof of having passed a nationally administered, standardized examination [the NPLEX, essentially] that is approved by the board and consists of written questions and practical questions assessing knowledge and proficiency on subject matter from the following content areas: (1) Basic sciences, including the following: (A) Anatomy; (B) biochemistry; (C) microbiology; (D) pathology; and (E) physiology; and (2) clinical sciences, including the following: (A) Emergency medicine and public health; (B) laboratory diagnosis and diagnostic imaging; (C) botanical medicine; (D) clinical nutrition; (E) physical and clinical diagnosis; (F) physical medicine; (G) psychology; (H) counseling; (I) ethics; and (J) homeopathy."

Note: so, an accredited school requiring basic and clinical sciences.  Wow, knowing what I know about 'the essentially naturopathic'.  Yes, that's right, homeopathy is claimed as SCIENCE.  And ethics too.  We know, and have know for quite some time, that homeopathy is IMPLAUSIBLE.

Edzard Ernst recently said it best in "Homeopathy, Non-Specific Effects and Good Medicine" (2010-11-13):

"in this issue, Brien et al. report the findings of a five-armed randomized controlled trial, which was aimed at differentiating between the effects of homeopathic remedies and patient consultations. The authors demonstrate that homeopathic remedies are placebos and show that 'the benefits of homeopathy are attributable to the consultation' [...] homeopathic remedies [...] are biologically implausible, and the 150 published trials collectively fail to indicate clinical effectiveness [...yes,] patients benefit from a long and empathic encounter with a homeopath but not from the remedy [...yes,] the effective element is not specifically homeopathy but the therapeutic relationship in general [...so, overall] homeopathic remedies are ineffective and empathetic therapeutic encounters are helpful [...] we should discard the ineffective and adopt the helpful. If we do this, we must tell our patients that homeopathic remedies are both implausible and ineffective. Thus, they cannot be recommended."

That's right, what KSBHA states is a clinical science hasn't ever been shown to be effective, and is considered implausible.  That amounts to being science-ejected.  The label upon naturopathy's homeopathy by KSBHA is false.

002. pseudoscience-by-legislation: what does naturopathy's false-labeling of what's science-ejected as "science" accomplish?

I've fashioned the term "epistemic conflation" [akin to pseudoscience, but encompassing more so the Franken-build of legitimate science and nonscience knowledge amalgamation so typical of naturopathy] to put an handle on naturopathy's M.O.   What naturopathy does is study some science content [e.g., 'basic medical science' and 'regular clinical medicine'], some nonscience content [the essentially naturopathic, sCAM woo-things] and combines the two areas under the umbrella term "science."  But, this is logically false.  Scientific knowledge is a specific kind of knowledge, and the other stuff is not scientific knowledge.  To blend knowledge kinds and falsely label it unblended is madness.

  Naturopathy's 'back-end' in all this misrepresentation is simply this: it's great marketing.  I see it also as unfair trade, and a violation of the professional ethos of informed consent.

It's also efficient: instead of doing actual science, or merely keeping up with the scientific literature and gutting from naturopathy 'that-which-is-archaic-junk', a little pdf document and a few lines of legislation are all that's needed to get on the commerce gravy train.

Now, lets be as expansive as possible: this epistemic conflation and false labeling of homeopathy as science happens across all of North America [NA; I'll exclude Mexico], not just in Kansas.  NPLEX, the licensure exam for NA naturopathy, clearly claims homeopathy as "science."

And this is why Naturocrit exists: to at least be a small voice countering this madness.  The naturopathic racket continues, even after all these years of continually publicly alerting State, Federal, and Provincial authorities.

Salzberg on Pseudoscience - Forbes 2010-10-27

here, I cite from a recent Forbes blog by Dr. Salzberg [see 001., below]; then, I extend it to include naturopathy [see 002., below]:

001. Steven Salzberg writes in "Osteopaths Versus Doctors" (2010-10-27):

"an osteopath has an D.O. degree, which is different from the standard medical (M.D.) degree [...granted] some osteopaths (DOs) are probably better doctors than some MDs [...] given that some MDs are outrageous promoters of pseudoscience [...e.g.] Andrew Weil [...yet] the training is not the same: the universities offering DO and MD degrees are largely disjoint, the standards are higher at schools offering MDs, and osteopathic colleges offer 'extra' training in [their] pseudoscientific practices [...overall,] when I’m looking for a doctor, I want someone who went to one of the best medical schools and received strictly science-based training. Colleges of osteopathic medicine do not fit the bill [...similarly,] a growing number of mainstream medical schools offer training in 'integrative' medicine, the latest marketing term used to disguise pseudoscience in the guise of real science. Those medical schools [...] have some explaining to do as well."

Note: there's no mention of naturopathy, so I'll make mention.

002. particularly applicable to naturopathy is the phrase:

"pseudoscience in the guise of science."

Note: my links above are quite intentional.  You have, specifically, the ruse known as homeopathy -- which is fused into an ND degree -- overall, and quite falsely, labeled science.