here, I continue a goodbye with a letter I sent in a flurry of certified mail to various education and legal regulatory accomplices that through the years have aided naturopathy in its deceit [I've edited some rather personal information here]:
2011-09-23
To all the parties involved in this
ONGOING Naturopathic Education Commerce and General
Commerce Fraud:
I've received notification that wage
garnishment will occur for the education loan debt I have [see copies
attached]. I am currently employed as a _______ with an income that
is roughly $_2000 a year and I will not voluntarily pay towards this
debt.
I will provide some background and
because I think this is an issue of consumer fraud /
misrepresentation in the area of higher education and fraud /
misrepresentation in general in terms of commerce, I've copied this
to Pioneer, NYSHESC, NYSAGO, CTDE, NYAGO, CTAGO and USDE:
-I attended CUNY Lehman College from
1990-1994, graduating Phi Beta Kappa, summa cum laude, and with
multiple honors. Grants covered my tuition, so I've no debt from my
BA.
-I then attended NYU towards an MA,
but I ceased this after getting interested in the program in
naturopathic medicine at the University of Bridgeport here in
Bridgeport, CT.
-I then attended UB's College of
Naturopathic Medicine for four years. I ceased this program
voluntarily because I came to the conclusion that naturopathy
inherently misrepresents itself to education consumers and to
society at large.
-I then attended CSU and the State
University of CT but neither of those programs ended up being
interesting to me and I have no graduate degree.
When I consolidated my debt, I was
surprised to find out that since the initial loans for grad school
were in NYS at NYU, that apparently my entire aggregate is now
NYSHESC. I'd actually take more pleasure if it was CT who had the
lot, as they are the greatest accomplices regarding the greatest
higher education falsehood I've ever heard of: the false labeling of
a doctoral degree as science when HUGELY in content not.
At the core of my debt is the UB
naturopathy misrepresentation which enticed me from NYU and which
later, after seeing it for what it truly was through the four years
of schooling there, messed up my professional path. I now consider
myself a whistle-blower and I have been publicly writing about this
naturopathic fraud at my blog naturocrit.blogspot.com for 5 years and
for more than 500 posts as well as carefully cataloging
naturopathy's claims in print, on the web, and specifically from
their own textbooks.
Apart from my own 'from the inside'
criticisms and compilations, I highly recommend the blog
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/
which does an even better job than I do at exposing what is clearly
naturopathic misrepresentation, irrationality, quackery, and
falsehood.
The documents I have are too numerous
to include here, but I've made them all publicly available online
through my blogger account
http://www.blogger.com/profile/14987563840947860899 . What I'd really like to know is why
I have to do all this leg work and consumers are not being properly
protected by you all.
Here's a version of what I know about
naturopathy fraud if you still don't get it, in terms of general
commerce and education commerce:
a) the University of Bridgeport labels
its naturopathy science. So, this deals with the education
consumer. Here's a picture I just took:
And here is UB stating their curriculum
(see http://stargazer.bridgeport.edu/naturopathy/desc/hm.html
) and its requisite homeopathy.
b) State-wide clinician groups
advertise similarly to the public. So,
this deals with general commerce. Here's
NYANP telling us
naturopathy is science (see http://nyanp.org/ndreport511.pdf
) as they try to get a law written: “[from p.1] naturopathy
is a science-based health care practice […and] natural therapies
include […] homeopathic remedies.” Here's
CT's State ND group (see http://www.cnpaonline.org/
) stating science and one of their members practicing homeopathy
c)
so , if you are following, the marketing claim is science and the
contents are homeopathy amongst other things. I use homeopathy here
as a microcosm of naturopathy's false representations, because
homeopathy is utterly and truly science-ejected. Here's a link to
the recent UK evidence-check that in sum says homeopathy doesn't
work, it can't work, and it's actually so scientifically-ejected
that NO FURTHER RESEARCH IS RECOMMENDED (see
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/45/45.pdf
).
d)
but, this fraud gets better. Go to the web site for the North
American licensure exam for NDs and you will find homeopathy
falsely labeled science (see http://www.nabne.org/nabne_page_23.php
).
I
have been at this research regarding naturopathy for well over 15
years now. When I first started, I knew little and believed their
labels. Here's the document that induced me, safely stashed away at
the Internet Archive (see
http://web.archive.org/web/19990221212454/http://www.teleport.com/~aanp/alliance/main.html
) wherein we're told “naturopathic physicians are the modern day
science based primary care doctor.” And, New York, here's an
article written by a NY naturopath and if you know anything about the
therapies and methods she is discussing – that is, if you are
literate in modern medical science – they are scientifically
nonsensical (see
http://niagara-gazette.com/features/x1126800427/NATURAL-HEALTH-Just-what-is-a-naturopath
).
But,
let me make a prediction: this licensed and soon to be licensed
falsehood will continue without investigation, consumers will
continue to be fleeced, and I'll become even poorer in the process.
-Rob
Cullen.
Note: the next step of this is to post their responses [and lack of response] and I'll take it directly to the media. Perhaps the best indication that absurdity is now quality is this simple fact: the Princeton Review medical school prep reference claims that the "naturopathic" is amongst "the best medical". If such a complete reversal of all values isn't remarkable, then I stand corrected in that very Orwellian sense [his 1984]:
peace IS war, ignorance IS strength, truth IS falsehood, science IS nonscience, virtue IS vice...and so on.
and, of course, I highly recommend the 'just published' study "Supported by Science?: What Canadian Naturopaths Advertise to the Public" [PMID 21920039; Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2011 Sep 15;7(1):14; see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21920039 ] by Caulfield and Rachul which states, for all those who don't get it yet and need to have their heads banged against the arse of Cu Chulainn [see here for this incredibly obscure reference]:
"a review of the therapies advertised on the websites of clinics offering naturopathic treatments does not support the proposition that naturopathic medicine is a science and evidence-based practice."
and, of course, I highly recommend the 'just published' study "Supported by Science?: What Canadian Naturopaths Advertise to the Public" [PMID 21920039; Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2011 Sep 15;7(1):14; see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21920039 ] by Caulfield and Rachul which states, for all those who don't get it yet and need to have their heads banged against the arse of Cu Chulainn [see here for this incredibly obscure reference]:
"a review of the therapies advertised on the websites of clinics offering naturopathic treatments does not support the proposition that naturopathic medicine is a science and evidence-based practice."
No comments:
Post a Comment