here, I provide an annotated script for the Naturocrit Podcast's Episode 009 Part 2b, titled “The Connecticut Naturopathic Physicians Association [CNPA] and A Supposed Modernization of Connecticut Naturopathy." In this Part 2b, I conclude my analysis by directly quoting from CNPA's pertaining video, from web pages of naturopathy's best accomplice aka the State of Connecticut, and from CNPA web pages:
001. the Episode 009b2 script and annotations:
Standard Introduction:
Standard Introduction:
Welcome
to, as that robot voice says, The
Naturocrit Podcast,
and thank you for boldly listening.
What ARE we even talking
about?
Well, this podcast series is my take on naturopathic medicine,
an area I've been studying for about twenty years, including my time
in so-called 'scientific
nonsectarian naturopathic medical school'.
My
approach is a pairing of scientific
skepticism and a
deep knowledge of naturopathy's
intimate details.
In
previous episodes of this series, I established that naturopathy is,
essentially, a kind of knowledge blending, misrepresentation, and
irrationality.
I
have termed naturopathy both 'an epistemic conflation falsely posing
itself as an epistemic delineation' and 'the naturopathillogical':
the
science-exterior is mixed with what is scientific, then that whole
muddle is absurdly claimed to be science as an entire category, while
particular sectarian science-ejected oath-obligations and
-requirements are coded or camouflaged, therein effectively
disguising naturopathy's system of beliefs in public
view.
Naturopathy's ultimate achievement is a profound erosion of
scientific
integrity and
freedom
of belief
packaged in the
marketing veneer "natural" and improperly embedded in the
academic category "science".
Episode
Synopsis:
Episode Question:
Episode 009 Part 2b Main Body:
A Preponderance, A Summary 'So Far' for this Naturocrit Podcast Episode 009:
From Part 1:
From Part 2a:
The
CNPA Video:
"why does the law covering the naturopathic scope of practice need to be changed?"
State of CT Documents:
2014 Testimony by UB's Agents to the State of CT:
In this
2-part Naturocrit Podcast Episode 009, titled “The Connecticut
Naturopathic Physicians Association [CNPA] and A Supposed
Modernization of Connecticut Naturopathy”, I will look at
naturopathy in Connecticut particularly because naturopaths here are
quite active this 2015 requesting prescriptive rights.
I say “here”
because Connecticut, or shall I say in Federal prosecutor parlance
'Corrupticut', is the State in which I live and here is where I went
to naturopathy school for four years.
So, let me finish sharing with
you the virtues of my naturopathic neighbors and their
accomplices.
Episode Question:
And my
overarching question, as two questions technically, for this
Naturocrit Podcast Episode 009 is:
“if naturopathy, at its core,
violates preponderant modern values concerning the physician-patient
relationship,
e.g. transparency and patient empowerment, as opposed to
archaic opacity and paternalism,
and violates preponderant modern
boundaries as regards science,
e.g. that science is a rather
specifically defined epistemic delineation, as opposed to an archaic
vague epistemic conflation,
CAN this political process that is
happening this 2015 in Connecticut accurately be termed
modernization? Or is it a kind of corruption?”
Episode 009 Part 2b Main Body:
I had decided to split the second part of Episode 009 into two parts.
I will now summarize what I've put together from Part 1 and Part 2a,
so we can then finish the Episode with this Part 2b.
A Preponderance, A Summary 'So Far' for this Naturocrit Podcast Episode 009:
So,
in sum and briefly stated, from this Episode 009's preponderance,
we've found:
From Part 1:
CT naturopathy's desire for a revised
licensure law that would be a supposed "modernization";
yet,
CT's State AANP organization, CNPA, doesn't clearly state 'what
naturopathy is all about';
an admission by a UBCNM ND graduate [ND Gruber] that
there are some things science can't support, including the central
premise which is 'what naturopathy is all about';
the USUAL corruption
of science, consumer rights, and of informed consent by the residents
of naturopathyland, though 'not being corrupt' is written into the ND
oath;
theoretical and therapeutic NONSENSE by that ND [ND Gruber] and other NDs as
is typical of naturopathy.
From Part 2a:
UB's fully accredited
FALSEHOOD at the University DOCTORAL level aka 'abject pseudoscience
and misrepresentation';
reversed values similar to the ND
Oath's;
theoretical and therapeutic NONSENSE, e.g. like the claim
'science subset homeopathy and kind' by UB administrators
downwards;
clarity, in an out-of-State kind of way, concerning 'the
essentially naturopathic' and absurd epistemic claims regarding such,
by way of the trunk of the NA U.S. naturopathy tree, NCNM and
Oregon.gov, as well as Bastyr University, shedding light on CNPA's
and UB's opacities and mislabelings.
So,
there's a shopping list of some context, some preponderance, in
terms of naturopathy's claims, beliefs, and activities, including
such in CT:
'commerce subset science as a categorical label subset
science-exterior nonsense MIXED with science', an epistemic conflation
falsely claiming to be an epistemic delineation.
I'll call that
falsehood 'an unfair trade' though
I am in no way legally schooled.
But it sounds good to me:
I give you
money for something specifically labeled such, and I don't get that
such through and through, I get mostly something you know is not that
such mixed with some of that offered such.
The product is adulterated,
its contents are corrupted:
you offer to sell me wine, and you sell me
wine plus mud, with the mud in great quantity.
Or, as as Dr. Mark
Crislip at the SFSBM is fond of saying:
you give me cow-pie mixed with apple pie, and the cow part is not beef or milk, it is the scat kind
of pie.
Therein, there's naturoscatolalia:
the shit naturopathy says.
the shit naturopathy says.
This systemic misrepresentation doesn't seem fair one to one,
and it especially doesn't seem fair when I'm just a little guy
private citizen on one side, and the misrepresentors are a big
private institution with '.gov' partnership, through and through, all
with deep coffers.
Anyway, the
video, finally.
ND Gruber asks an apparently rather grumpy ND Liva in the CNPA video "2015 Legislative Update with Dr Rick Liva" [vsc 2015-03-04], which runs about 20 minutes and is hosted on ND Gruber's Youtube account "CAM Wellness Institute":
ND Gruber asks an apparently rather grumpy ND Liva in the CNPA video "2015 Legislative Update with Dr Rick Liva" [vsc 2015-03-04], which runs about 20 minutes and is hosted on ND Gruber's Youtube account "CAM Wellness Institute":
"why does the law covering the naturopathic scope of practice need to be changed?"
ND
Liva replies:
"very simply, the law was enacted in 1923. It's
roughly 91 years old. And it has not kept pace with the education
and training of naturopathic physicians and therefore needs to be
substantially modernized […] the [CT] law's too old, [it] needs to
be brought up to par [...like] Oregon."
Make contemporary / modernize, get educated!
Those are very virtuous.
But what's really
funny is to think about how "not kept pace" naturopathy's
principles and therapeutics are, as compared to modern contemporary
medicine, as compared to modern contemporary knowledge, as compared
to modern contemporary values.
Essentially, in my view, the
naturopaths want to veil that old stuff while keeping it, and yet
pose it as "modern."
It's so simple to see, on analysis.
And
ND Gruber asks:
“who do you think is going to benefit from this
modernized scope of practice?”
ND Liva replies:
“patients,
patients, and patients […] the patients are really the biggest
recipients of benefit to a modernized law for naturopathic doctors
[...and] the naturopathic medical students at the University of
Bridgeport College of Naturopathic Medicine […] the school benefits
as well […] to meet the educational mandate that's put out there by
the CNME [...and] NDs [benefit].”
So, HOW again does the public
benefit from such as deception as 'science subset homeopathy and
kind'?
How?
I can see how naturopathy hugely benefits from such a
corruption of scientific integrity and consumer protections.
And I
find it ironic that the stuff without integrity, naturopathy, is
called INTEGR-ative medicine.
It should be called 'nonintegrity
medicine':
it has no epistemic integrity, it has no ethical
integrity.
ND Gruber adds:
“[this is] a winning proposition for many
different groups […] patients […] students […] because they get
better quality education […] and the [ND] doctors [...who'll] be
able to provide a more comprehensive approach to treatments.”
Quality
education?
How do STUDENTS, the education consumers, benefit when at
the core of all this is what is 'epistemically false, absurd and
deceptive'?
Now, specifically regarding the pharmacy expansion, ND Liva
states:
“natural medicine is our preferred mode of treatment […but]
there are some cases where people absolutely need drug therapy […]
the medical doctors have no data, no evidence, no documentation
whatsoever that says that any NDs cause harm when NDs use drug
authority in other states [...] as you may know, most states that
license naturopathic physicians have robust drug authority and drug
authority is what we're asking for in this legislative session […]
what we're after is drug authority […] the medical doctors are our
largest opposition […claiming] we're not educated and trained
enough […] we're well-trained physicians [x2...we do not pose] a
public safety threat [...a] threat to the public safety.”
I
disagree:
when magic beans, unicorn tears, and flying carpets are
conflated with what is actually scientifically supported, I think
that has the makings of a HUGE THREAT to the VERY BASIS of modern,
contemporary KNOWLEDGE DELINEATION and then all that arises from
such;
when we LIE about how we know what we know.
ND Gruber
states:
“the medical opposition did not provide any evidence.”
So,
it's interesting that ND Liva says that "evidence" and
"documentation" are important when making decisions, and ND
Gruber mentions "evidence" and its importance too WHILE it
is VERY EASY to document how NDs are NOT "well-trained
physicians", as I hope my Episode 009's preponderance
demonstrates.
Call them "metaphysicians" and I'll begin to
concede you are using proper labelings.
And that's not just a convenient pun, with their empty remedies and wacko diagnostics, their vital forces, their supernaturalisms.
ND Liva informs us that:
And that's not just a convenient pun, with their empty remedies and wacko diagnostics, their vital forces, their supernaturalisms.
ND Liva informs us that:
“the [legislative] session doesn't end until the first week in
June.”
ND Gruber advises listeners that:
“[sending] more than one
letter is very helpful.”
Hmmm?
Is that how SCANT support is for
naturopathy, that they want people to VOTE TWICE and such?
And again,
I must mention, we see in the video that CNPA motto “vis medicatrix
naturae” without contextualization.
And that's it for the video:
grumpy, unhelpful, false and short.
grumpy, unhelpful, false and short.
State of CT Documents:
Herein, is
CT naturopathy's MAJOR accomplice.
I'd mentioned I'd discuss “the
virtues of my naturopathic neighbors and their accomplices” in Part
One of this Episode 009.
So, what about my State government which
SANCTIONS naturopathy, in a '.gov' kind of way?
Well, there are A LOT
of State of CT naturopathy documents.
2014 Testimony by UB's Agents to the State of CT:
Speaking of naturoscatolalia, I present to you
UB and CNPA naturopaths' 2014 testimony before Connecticut's Public
Health Committee.
I came across
this as I was searching cga.ct.gov.
The document is "PH Committee Hearing Transcript for 03/14/2014" [2015 archived].
So, this is newly discovered, and
I consider it a very important document.
It ranks right up there with
the AANP-Alliance document I've cited from in previous Naturocrit
Podcast episodes.
You WOULDN'T think, perhaps, that top-dog
naturopaths in CT would state PATENT FALSEHOOD to the legislators of
CT during a Public Health Committee meeting in the year 2014.
AND, you
may not think that such PATENT falsehood -- WRONG assertions that
'naturopathy and its contents' is categorically scientific -- would
be left up on the web by the '.gov' without even a WARNING from the
'.gov' placed upon the documents that
'there-be-serious-falsehoods-here'.
Again, I admire your idealism!
Now,
the State of CT has a science center.
In its "Board of Trustees"
web page,
at ctsciencecenter.org, we're
told its board members include:
the current Governor,
the current Mayor of Hartford [CT],
and the current S.T.E.M. Director of the Hartford Public School system [CT].
the current Governor,
the current Mayor of Hartford [CT],
and the current S.T.E.M. Director of the Hartford Public School system [CT].
And in the document "States of Matter", ctsciencecenter.org
tells us:
"scientific literacy includes speaking, listening,
presenting, interpreting, reading and writing about science [...]
scientific inquiry is a thoughtful and coordinated attempt to search
out, describe, explain and predict natural phenomena."
By
the way, the State of CT is NOT a "lead state partner" in
creating the Next Generation Science
Standards, wherein
naturopathy's vitalism and kind are displayed as an EPITOME of the
science-ejected
[see the National Academies Press book "A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (2012)." This is that excerpt:
Hmmmmmmm, I am ASHAMED!
Yet, the State of CT
Department of Education's document "Position Statement on Science Education" [2015 archived] states:
"the Connecticut State Board of Education regards
scientific literacy as evidence of a high-quality science education.
People who are scientifically literate understand core science
concepts of life, earth and physical science; use scientific
reasoning; and recognize the interactions among science, technology
and society. Science education teaches students to raise questions [to be skeptical!],
to persevere in search of answers, to reason logically, and to
distinguish between unsubstantiated claims and those that have valid
and reliable substantiation [to be skeptical!]. All students need opportunities to
refine and strengthen their scientific content knowledge and
scientific inquiry skills on a continuum from preschool through high
school and beyond."
Beyond, like doctoral health science?
Yes,
they said:
"all students need opportunities to refine and
strengthen their scientific content knowledge and scientific inquiry
skills on a continuum from preschool through high school and beyond
[...] to distinguish between unsubstantiated claims and those that
have valid and reliable substantiation."
And I will come back to
those words.
Specifically,
the NDs who testified in 2014 were:
ND Brady, a UBCNM 'science subset
naturopathy subset homeopathy [and kind]' administrator;
ND Liva, our friend from
earlier parts, who sits on the UBCNM Advisory Committee;
and ND
Prenguber, who is the current UBCNM Dean.
The
Connecticut legislators who were present include:
"chairmen:
Senator Gerratana, Representative Johnson [...] Senators:
Holder-Winfield, Kane, Musto, Slossberg, Welch; Representatives:
Arconti, Betts, Cook, Conroy, Davis, Demicco, Hovey, Klarides,
Maroney, P. Miller, Perillo, Riley, Ryan, Sayers,
Scribner, Srinivasan, Tercyak, Widlitz, Zoni, and Ziobron."
Really, the
crowd was THAT BIG.
That is a VERY BIG committee.
I've already, in-part,
done a Naturocrit Blog post about part of the NDs' testimony, titled
"ND Brady 2014 cga.ct.gov Testimony: Wherein Senator Gerratana's PHC Gets a Big Fat Falsehood".
But here, I want to make sure we hear from all three testifying
NDs.
Here's ND Brady speaking with the "Public Health"
[co-]chair, Senator Gerratana.
ND Brady states:
"the
licensed naturopathic physician attends a doctoral-level, four-year
naturopathic medical school, and is educated in all of the same basic
sciences as an MD [...] using all evidence-based tools [...] we take
rigorous national exams called NPLEX [...and] in the end, what we're
asking for is nothing more than fairness and equity as a profession
[...] the modern naturopathic medical profession."
So, there we
have science mentioned, evidence, rigor, fairness / equity,
and the 'of the professions claim.'
Senator Gerratana asks:
"do
you follow in your curriculum at the University of Bridgeport, do you
follow evidence-based science in your studies and your curriculum
work?"
ND Brady replies:
"of course, yeah [...] our program is an
evidence-based curriculum [...] an evidence-based curriculum."
Senator
Gerratana follows up:
"it's a scientific evidence-based
curriculum?"
And ND Brady answers:
"yes, absolutely."
And I'm torn
between exclaiming "holy cow" and "bullshit."
Perhaps
I'll say 'holy cowshit', and 'holy naturoscatolalia'.
That's the claim by
ND Brady:
'doctoral science at a university subset PATENT nonscience
JUNK mixed with science'.
Yeah, absolutely.
And I'll call this 'science
illiterate sectarian pontification'.
And I think I'm being nice there,
because truly science is being DENIED, and someone is so FULL of
themselves they think that while DENYING science they can 'DECREE scientific-status.'
All hail David M. Brady, who, obviously in
comparison to the the Connecticut State Board of Education "Position
Statement on Science Education", needs to:
"refine
and strengthen [...his] scientific content knowledge and scientific
inquiry skills [...to then be able to] distinguish between unsubstantiated
claims and those that have valid and reliable substantiation."
There's
also testimony from:
ND Liva:
who states:
"my
name is Rick Liva. I'm a naturopathic physician [...] I'm also the
chairperson of the legislative committee for the Connecticut
Naturopathic Physician Association [CNPA...] Senator Gerratana,
Representative Johnson, and the rest of the Public Health Committee
members, I come to you today to ask that you support the attachment
of bill language for the modernization of the naturopathic scope of
practice and attach it to House Bill 5537 [...] the modernization of
the 90-year-old naturopathic practice set."
So, there's that word
again, "modernization".
And ND Liva states:
"NDs are
sufficiently educated and trained."
He also, at one point, rather
ironically says:
"we [do] have to do certain double-speaks and
semantics."
Taken together, I'd say go to UB's contents, see how
crappy their 'science subset homeopathy and kind' standards are, and
therein we have 'verbal shenanigans galore'.
The new bill won't relieve
that naturopathic MO, it further sanctions it.
ND Prenguber:
The UB page
"Marcia Prenguber New Dean of UB College of Naturopathic Medicine" (2015 archived) states:
"Dr.
Prenguber holds a doctorate in natural medicine [...] a
Master of Science in Education Administration from California State
University, Fullerton, and a Master of Science in Education from
Johns Hopkins University. 'The University and the College of
Naturopathic Medicine could not be more pleased to have such an
experienced physician and leader within the naturopathic medicine
community join us,' said UB Vice Provost of Health Sciences Dr. David
Brady. 'The University is committed to attracting the brightest and
most innovative leaders in all programs within the UB Division of
Health Sciences, and the addition of Dr. Prenguber is the latest
demonstration of that commitment.'"
Another NCNM graduate, and so
much 'science, science, science' labeling.
Interesting, overall, how –
even though a year has gone by, or so, in which ND Prenguber has
become the dean of UBCNM, with her education "science"
accolades and all – that UB's language describing naturopathy has
not changed.
NCNM's much more transparent language has not been
adopted.
Yet, preponderantly, those two versions of describing
naturopathy are supposedly ALL the same, because naturopathy tells us
it is "distinct [...and] distinguished" by THOSE
principles.
Obviously, for CT, the NCNM stuff is apparently OK to CODE
at UB.
CT citizens don't deserve to know, so they can then freely
decide, and as consumers, they are merely marks to be exploited,
while transparency is a NECESSITY in the SCIENCES.
Yes, such a
commitment, such a COMMITMENT.
Incidentally, I have archived a 2011
cancer.goshenhealth.org web page "Cancer Center Doctor Discusses Naturopathic Medicine and Cancer Prevention on Fort Wayne PBS 39" [vsc
2011-01-26], featuring ND Prenguber, which states:
"naturopathic
physicians cooperate with all other branches of medical science, and
at Goshen Center for Cancer Care, Dr. Marcia Prenguber, ND, and
her staff use naturopathic medicine to strengthen the body's own
internal cancer-fighting abilities [...] naturopathic medicine
utilizes a variety of modalities to achieve these goals, including
the therapeutic use of nutrients, as well as botanical medicine,
hydrotherapy, massage and homeopathy."
[This "branch of science" claim is also at NYU].
[This "branch of science" claim is also at NYU].
So, there's that broad --
SO BROAD -- science claim upon naturopathy, as 'supposed branch of
medical science', and there's 'coded vitalism and homeopathy'.
This was
a place ND Prenguber, worked before becoming Dean of
UBCNM.
Unfortunately, the page is no longer live, and it is
blocked-by-robots in terms of Archive.org, but I do have it
video-screen-captured and saved.
Again:
this I'll call 'science
illiterate sectarian pontification'.
goshenhealth.org is part of
Indiana University, which is iuhealth.org:
quackademic medicine
marches on!
Indiana University's current form "Department Of Naturopathic Medicine Consent To Consultation" (2015 archived) is
interesting.
It states:
"doctors of naturopathic medicine (NDs)
receive extensive training in basic medical sciences [...] anatomy,
physiology, biochemistry, pathology [...] doctors of
naturopathic medicine focus on strategies such as clinical nutrition,
homeopathy, botanicals, hydrotherapy [...] among others [...]
national standards of care and practice as well as peer review
process have evolved in support of naturopathic medicine."
So,
there's that 'as-if-science-based' posture, then homeopathy, and the
absurd claim that somehow modern medical standards have degraded SO
FAR that 'empty pills such as homeopathy falsely posed as efficacious
to a cancer patient' are acceptable.
I feel sickened.
Apparently,
on-staff now is ND Moore, a Bastyr
graduate.
And
a search >site:iuhealth.org naturopathic OR naturopathy
medicatrix< has NO results.
The
UBCNM Dean states, to the CT legislators:
"my name is Marsha
Prenguber [...] I'm a naturopathic physician, and I've recently
returned to the state of Connecticut to live and work here as a
newly appointed dean of the College of Naturopathic Medicine at the
University of Bridgeport [...] I received my naturopathic medicine
degree from the College of Naturopathic Medicine in Oregon [NCNM]. I
also completed a residency in naturopathic oncology. I'm the past
president of the Council on Naturopathic Medical Education [...] the
US Department of Education-recognized programmatic accrediting body
for naturopathic schools. That experience provided me with the skills
to evaluate the academic and clinical aspects of the naturopathic
schools, and evaluate each program against the rigorous standards of
the accrediting body."
So there's NCNM, that scary term
'naturopathic oncology', CNME and USDE, and RIGOROUS standards
claimed.
Do you believe she said RIGOROUS?
'Wine plus mud equals wine
standards', IMHO.
She goes on:
"my most recent role prior to my
appointment at the University was [...as] the Director of Integrative Care
at Indiana University Health Goshen Center for Cancer Care, an
integrative cancer treatment center [...] naturopathic doctors have
the training in the use of botanical, nutritional, and pharmaceutical
medications that can provide safe healthcare approaches to support
their patients, to restore and maintain health."
So there's that
Indiana University place that stated broadly 'science subset
nonscience', and no mention of that "h" word just then,
homeopathy.
Then, the transcript tells us:
"Senator Gerratana
[speaking]: so with respect to the resources you're using in certain
types of homeopathy in your practices, the materials for that aspect
of your practice, where are you getting those materials from? The
homeopathy materials?"
Wow, there's that ONE THING that truly is
the ONE THING [amongst MANY things, actually, like supernaturalism, teleology and
kind, and naturopathic 'kinds' like homeopathy] that hugely belies
naturopathy's science labeling.
Just WOW.
ND Prenguber answers:
"well it's actually a pretty long history with the use
of homeopathy. There have been more research trials that have been
done in recent years to evaluate them."
Well, actually, all the
big quality stuff has DISMISSED homeopathy in recent years.
But, the
ND cites ONE trial, from 20 years ago, stating:
"there's a
relatively well-known trial that was done in Nicaragua with the use
of homeopathy [...] in children with diarrhea [...] they found that,
in fact, the homeopathy was what made the difference. And so we use
those bases of information, trials [...] to help in the teaching of
the use of that."
So, there's the UBCNM ND Dean who has stated
this HUGE RIGOR background, and as regards ND Prenguber's
'in-support-of-homeopathy citation', I'm gobsmacked.
That is the EPITOME
of cherry-picking [pseudoscience]:
IGNORE what science has been doing
for twenty years, and pick a crappy study that tells you what you
want to hear.
By the year 2014, the 2009 House of Commons VAST and HUGELY RIGOROUS study came out that said homeopathy is
USELESS,
as in:
"to
maintain patient trust, choice and safety, the Government should not
endorse the use of placebo treatments, including homeopathy.
Homeopathy should not be funded on the NHS and the MHRA should stop
licensing homeopathic products."
But ONLY an obscure, weak, flawed, low-ranking AGED study from 1994, twenty years before, was cited by the UBCNM Dean
and former CNME President AS IF that's a literature review, as if
that is somehow acceptable, as if that is RIGOR.
Doctoral level
science rigor?
I think not.
What really disgusts me is how the
ND is NOT CORRECTED by the chair[s] of the Public Health Committee
regarding her 'homeopathy bullshit citation'.
Obviously, the State of CT
is aware of the presence of homeopathy within UB's naturopathy, and
UB naturopathy's claims that naturopathy's contents are -- 'absolutely or in an absolute sense' -- science
based.
Yet, if the CHAIR[s] of of the PHC can't recognized patent
nonsense posing as science, well...I'm am disgusted.
I find UB's
agents' claims absurd and false, I find the OPERATION and the LACK OF
KNOWLEDGE of the PHC to be ABSURD and pathetic.
Obviously,
naturopaths IGNORE the findings of science, pick what they want from
the body of literature, and PRETEND no matter how absurd.
OBVIOUSLY the PHC is a rubber stamp, without RIGOR, without any scientific chops.
OBVIOUSLY the PHC is a rubber stamp, without RIGOR, without any scientific chops.
These are HUGELY reversed values.
Now, a certain Orac and editor
of sciencebasedmedicine.org, did a 2007 blog post at scienceblogs.com
titled "Studying Homeopathy in Third World Countries".
He
noted, regarding such homeopathy studies:
"this study purported
to show a treatment effect, although it was small and arguable
whether, even if real, it would be clinically significant [...] this
study was riddled with methodological difficulties, including failure
to control for diet [...and] the level of dehydration [...] and
previous treatment interventions [...] finally, they did not use
optimal recommended methods for quantifying diarrhea output."
Why
use controls and accurate measuring when you want to show that what
you believe works, not whether or not it TRULY works!
Why be rigorous,
when you don't have to!
Why generate firm evidence when all you need
is diarrhea.
Yet, ND Prenguber had said to the PHC:
"in fact, the
homeopathy was what made the difference."
As if that's even
possible to know from the so shittily designed study.
The University of Bridgeport's College of Naturopathic Medicine is the only naturopathy program that lists at ctdhe.org when >naturopathic< is searched for.
And that listing links to bridgeport.edu, UB's web portal ALL without context, without warning.
Imagine a State's Department of Agriculture linking to and therein promoting a School of Magic Bean Farming.
Imagine a State Department of Aeronautics linking to and therein promoting a School of Flying Carpets.
Imagine a State Zoo claiming they have actual UNICORNS.
With all-of-them taking your money, based on falsehood, with '.gov' promotion.
"We the people" they take from.
At the ctdhe.org page "Program Inventory Search Results University of Bridgeport" we're told:
"doctor's degree [...] naturopathic medicine."
Or shall I say:
"doctor of magic beans, flying carpets, and unicorn tears."
Many documents up at ctdhe.org repeat the claim 'science subset naturopathy', would you believe?
Again, ALL without warning, in PARTNERSHIP.
Of course, this is EAGER and SHALLOW State of Connecticut endorsement of and PARTNERSHIP with UB naturopathy, as opposed to IMPARTIAL and RIGOROUS analysis and scrutiny, regulation and consumer PROTECTION.
It is disgusting.
For example, there's "Agenda Meeting of the Board Of Governors For Higher Education Housatonic Community College Bridgeport, CT October 15, 2008".
The root "scien" is in this document at least 83 times.
It states:
"the University’s [...] health sciences [...which includes] naturopathic medicine [...and] acupuncture."
That's the claim 'science subset naturopathy and acupuncture'.
There's "Agenda Board of Governors for Higher Education Department of Higher Education Hartford, CT January 20, 2010" which has the term "health sciences" in there at least 30 times.
It states:
"the University of Bridgeport’s Health Science Division currently offers degrees in dental hygiene, nutrition, acupuncture, chiropractic, and naturopathic medicine [...] new degree programs [...a] Bachelor of [...] Health Science, University of Bridgeport [...] Institution: University of Bridgeport. Item: licensure of a program in Health Science, leading to the Bachelor of Science (B.S.) degree [...] the University’s connection with and commitment to the health sciences sector in Bridgeport [...] the University of Bridgeport has applied for licensure of a program in Health Science to the Board of Governors for Higher Education [...] the graduate Health Sciences programs [...] to provide high-quality education in health sciences for state and regional residents by offering a bachelor’s degree program in Health Sciences."
So, my impression is with 'science subset nonscience' going strong at UB since the naturopathy program started in 1997 – that's getting to be now TWENTY YEARS of operation -- 'full speed ahead' with giving UB permission to increase the size of 'a rotting epistemic tumor eating away at scientific integrity and freedom of belief' by way of a new "health sciences" bachelor degree.
Now, I wonder what the MANDATE for the CTDHE is?
Well, it turns out ctdhe.org is only an archived site since 2011.
According to its homepage:
"as of July 1, 2011, the Board of Governors for Higher Education and the Department of Higher Education no longer exist. This website is being maintained for archival purposes only. For current information, please go to: [the] Board of Regents for Higher Education […] ct.edu [and the] Office of Higher Education […] ctohe.org."
Perhaps, why have one government organization do a TERRIBLE job when you can split it into TWO!
So, let's go where we've been pointed to.
What I realize, too, is that I, as a nationally certified post-secondary instructor, have ethical obligations within that membership which are QUITE VIOLATED by what I am about to detail and I have detailed, such as:
"I shall remain CURRENT in my knowledge and skills […] I shall be HONEST […] I shall respect and obey the LAW, and all regulations within the law, that serve to PROTECT THE PUBLIC in connection to matters of PRACTICE related to my PROFESSIONAL responsibilities […] I agree to uphold HIGH standards of professional behavior at ALL times.”
This entity apparently covers just CT 's State Colleges and Universities, the one's they own and run.
By the way, CT's UCONN does host a naturopathic radio show by ND Storch.
That is for another podcast episode at some point, though.
This entity seems to be what covers schools like UB in CT because, in "About Us", we're told:
"the Office of Higher Education seeks to advance the promise of postsecondary education for all state residents, and to advocate on behalf of students, taxpayers, and the postsecondary schools and colleges which fall under its purview. The Office carries out its mission by assuring that students have access to postsecondary institutions which meet the highest standards of academic quality, by administering the state’s student financial aid programs, and by serving as an information and consumer protection resource [...] key state responsibilities [...include] the licensure and accreditation of Connecticut’s independent colleges and universities (programmatic and institutional; non-profit and for-profit)."
Well, MY ASS you fulfill that NOBLE mission and mandate:
"on behalf of students, taxpayers" WHILE also "the postsecondary schools and colleges".
I wonder which of those two groups, truly, is FAVORED, are partnered with?
Come on, this is postsecondary education in the United States, which is often:
a Wild West, as in lawless, feeding-frenzy market, as in 'profitable, bank-loan funded student exploitation based' INDUSTRY.
So often.
Could THOSE FAVORED more-so be the hugely financially endowed education entities -- for instance, Yale University has an endowment of $24 billion, billion, billion -- as opposed to their marks, the modern day higher education consumer, the common person from all levels of income, who has to pay ridiculously exorbitant amounts to these schools, the government, and to banks to obtain an education beyond K-12 for a chance of, for the smell of, for JUST A PROMISE of life-improving better employment?
Now, currently, there are only two search results from ctohe.org for "naturopathic" and none for naturopathy, homeopathy, or homeopathic.
There's "Office of Higher Education: Institutional Program List: University of Bridgeport" which states:
"doctor's degree [...] naturopathic medicine."
And there's "Health Occupation Training In Connecticut" (2015 archived) which states:
"naturopathic medicine [at the] University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport."
So, there's UB's naturopathy, fully State of CT endorsed and filtered as:
"[supposedly] the highest standards of academic quality [...embedded within a context of supposed] consumer protection."
ctohe.org's promise is that students get:
"the highest standards of academic quality."
But, the PRESENCE without warning of 'naturopathy as fully State-of-CT endorsed and promoted, naturopathy's for-twenty-years almost operation of science subset nonscience' -- BREAKS this promise SO OBVIOUSLY.
And it's simple to find:
just LOOK at what UB contains and requires towards that ND degree, LOOK at what science legitimately supports, see the complete absurdity of 'science subset naturopathy subset homeopathy and kind', as in 'science subset NON-SCIENCE'.
Gross dereliction?
I think so.
Like when a PHC board is told science, then asks questions about homeopathy within that label, and proceedings continue 'as if all is rational.'
So, the State of CT as an education "consumer protection resource"?
No, the PRIMARY customers are the schools, the banks, the accreditation bureaucracy:
the marks, the citizens, are just to be kept 'happy and subservient enough' to keep the gravy train rolling.
Let's see if the State of CT falsely claims 'science subset naturopathy' online elsewhere, without WARNING of the falsehood that such language is.
Other State of CT Pages and Naturopathy:
ctdhe.org:
The University of Bridgeport's College of Naturopathic Medicine is the only naturopathy program that lists at ctdhe.org when >naturopathic< is searched for.
And that listing links to bridgeport.edu, UB's web portal ALL without context, without warning.
Imagine a State's Department of Agriculture linking to and therein promoting a School of Magic Bean Farming.
Imagine a State Department of Aeronautics linking to and therein promoting a School of Flying Carpets.
Imagine a State Zoo claiming they have actual UNICORNS.
With all-of-them taking your money, based on falsehood, with '.gov' promotion.
"We the people" they take from.
At the ctdhe.org page "Program Inventory Search Results University of Bridgeport" we're told:
"doctor's degree [...] naturopathic medicine."
Or shall I say:
"doctor of magic beans, flying carpets, and unicorn tears."
Many documents up at ctdhe.org repeat the claim 'science subset naturopathy', would you believe?
Again, ALL without warning, in PARTNERSHIP.
Of course, this is EAGER and SHALLOW State of Connecticut endorsement of and PARTNERSHIP with UB naturopathy, as opposed to IMPARTIAL and RIGOROUS analysis and scrutiny, regulation and consumer PROTECTION.
It is disgusting.
For example, there's "Agenda Meeting of the Board Of Governors For Higher Education Housatonic Community College Bridgeport, CT October 15, 2008".
The root "scien" is in this document at least 83 times.
It states:
"the University’s [...] health sciences [...which includes] naturopathic medicine [...and] acupuncture."
That's the claim 'science subset naturopathy and acupuncture'.
There's "Agenda Board of Governors for Higher Education Department of Higher Education Hartford, CT January 20, 2010" which has the term "health sciences" in there at least 30 times.
It states:
"the University of Bridgeport’s Health Science Division currently offers degrees in dental hygiene, nutrition, acupuncture, chiropractic, and naturopathic medicine [...] new degree programs [...a] Bachelor of [...] Health Science, University of Bridgeport [...] Institution: University of Bridgeport. Item: licensure of a program in Health Science, leading to the Bachelor of Science (B.S.) degree [...] the University’s connection with and commitment to the health sciences sector in Bridgeport [...] the University of Bridgeport has applied for licensure of a program in Health Science to the Board of Governors for Higher Education [...] the graduate Health Sciences programs [...] to provide high-quality education in health sciences for state and regional residents by offering a bachelor’s degree program in Health Sciences."
So, my impression is with 'science subset nonscience' going strong at UB since the naturopathy program started in 1997 – that's getting to be now TWENTY YEARS of operation -- 'full speed ahead' with giving UB permission to increase the size of 'a rotting epistemic tumor eating away at scientific integrity and freedom of belief' by way of a new "health sciences" bachelor degree.
Now, I wonder what the MANDATE for the CTDHE is?
Well, it turns out ctdhe.org is only an archived site since 2011.
According to its homepage:
"as of July 1, 2011, the Board of Governors for Higher Education and the Department of Higher Education no longer exist. This website is being maintained for archival purposes only. For current information, please go to: [the] Board of Regents for Higher Education […] ct.edu [and the] Office of Higher Education […] ctohe.org."
Perhaps, why have one government organization do a TERRIBLE job when you can split it into TWO!
So, let's go where we've been pointed to.
What I realize, too, is that I, as a nationally certified post-secondary instructor, have ethical obligations within that membership which are QUITE VIOLATED by what I am about to detail and I have detailed, such as:
"I shall remain CURRENT in my knowledge and skills […] I shall be HONEST […] I shall respect and obey the LAW, and all regulations within the law, that serve to PROTECT THE PUBLIC in connection to matters of PRACTICE related to my PROFESSIONAL responsibilities […] I agree to uphold HIGH standards of professional behavior at ALL times.”
ct.edu, the Board of Regents for Higher Education:
This entity apparently covers just CT 's State Colleges and Universities, the one's they own and run.
By the way, CT's UCONN does host a naturopathic radio show by ND Storch.
That is for another podcast episode at some point, though.
ctohe.org, the Office of Higher Education:
This entity seems to be what covers schools like UB in CT because, in "About Us", we're told:
"the Office of Higher Education seeks to advance the promise of postsecondary education for all state residents, and to advocate on behalf of students, taxpayers, and the postsecondary schools and colleges which fall under its purview. The Office carries out its mission by assuring that students have access to postsecondary institutions which meet the highest standards of academic quality, by administering the state’s student financial aid programs, and by serving as an information and consumer protection resource [...] key state responsibilities [...include] the licensure and accreditation of Connecticut’s independent colleges and universities (programmatic and institutional; non-profit and for-profit)."
Well, MY ASS you fulfill that NOBLE mission and mandate:
"on behalf of students, taxpayers" WHILE also "the postsecondary schools and colleges".
I wonder which of those two groups, truly, is FAVORED, are partnered with?
Come on, this is postsecondary education in the United States, which is often:
a Wild West, as in lawless, feeding-frenzy market, as in 'profitable, bank-loan funded student exploitation based' INDUSTRY.
So often.
Could THOSE FAVORED more-so be the hugely financially endowed education entities -- for instance, Yale University has an endowment of $24 billion, billion, billion -- as opposed to their marks, the modern day higher education consumer, the common person from all levels of income, who has to pay ridiculously exorbitant amounts to these schools, the government, and to banks to obtain an education beyond K-12 for a chance of, for the smell of, for JUST A PROMISE of life-improving better employment?
Now, currently, there are only two search results from ctohe.org for "naturopathic" and none for naturopathy, homeopathy, or homeopathic.
There's "Office of Higher Education: Institutional Program List: University of Bridgeport" which states:
"doctor's degree [...] naturopathic medicine."
And there's "Health Occupation Training In Connecticut" (2015 archived) which states:
"naturopathic medicine [at the] University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport."
So, there's UB's naturopathy, fully State of CT endorsed and filtered as:
"[supposedly] the highest standards of academic quality [...embedded within a context of supposed] consumer protection."
ctohe.org's promise is that students get:
"the highest standards of academic quality."
But, the PRESENCE without warning of 'naturopathy as fully State-of-CT endorsed and promoted, naturopathy's for-twenty-years almost operation of science subset nonscience' -- BREAKS this promise SO OBVIOUSLY.
And it's simple to find:
just LOOK at what UB contains and requires towards that ND degree, LOOK at what science legitimately supports, see the complete absurdity of 'science subset naturopathy subset homeopathy and kind', as in 'science subset NON-SCIENCE'.
Gross dereliction?
I think so.
Like when a PHC board is told science, then asks questions about homeopathy within that label, and proceedings continue 'as if all is rational.'
So, the State of CT as an education "consumer protection resource"?
No, the PRIMARY customers are the schools, the banks, the accreditation bureaucracy:
the marks, the citizens, are just to be kept 'happy and subservient enough' to keep the gravy train rolling.
Let's see if the State of CT falsely claims 'science subset naturopathy' online elsewhere, without WARNING of the falsehood that such language is.
Let's see more of HOW MUCH MORE OF AN ACCOMPLICE the State of CT is in all this.
More Other State of CT Pages:
Now, a deep search, >site:ct.gov naturopathic<, gets SO MANY results.
Now, before I do this, I'll complain:
SO MANY of the PDFs up on the web by ct.gov are UNSEARCHABLE.
As such, they are MERELY images, whose contents only list by way of Google.com because Google's spidering OCRs such PDFs.
Now, that's not a big deal for me, I have Paperport [and Acrobat] which can OCR for me, but it doesn't seem FAIR in terms of accessibility for the public in general.
I think the State of CT can do BETTER, MUCH BETTER, for its citizens.
So, here are some more pages, in no particular order of priority.
From cga.ct.gov, there's the 2010 page “HS Committee Hearing Transcript for 03/02/2010” [vsc 2015-04-16; 2015 archived] which states:
“the new University of Bridgeport Health Science Center [...] in our Health Science Center, we have acupuncture, nursing, naturopathic, and chiropractic clinics.”
This is said by UB's Laurel Risom (2015 archived).
So that's the claim of 'science subset naturopathy' at ct.gov.
There's the cga.ct.gov page “Scope of Practice Determination for Health are Professions October 1, 2009” [vsc 2015-04-16; 2012 archived], a PDF that is IS searchable, which gets the ND North American Licensure Exam involved, the NPLEX.
It mentions:
“licensure requirements […for NDs in CT] graduated from a school of naturopathy approved by the Connecticut State Board of Naturopathic Examiners and Department of Public Health, with award of the doctor of naturopathy degree […] successfully completed both the Basic Sciences (Part I) and Clinical Sciences Examination (Part II) of the Naturopathic Physician Licensing Examination.”
So, there's both sections of the ND licensure exam categorically labeled science, and did you know that within Part II is HOMEOPATHY.
Absurd, and .gov sanctioned.
There's the unsearchable cga.ct.gov PDF “Testimony Of Myriah Hinchey ND, Submitted To The Public Health Committee Wednesday, February 20, 2013” [vsc 2015-04-16; 2015 archived] which also mentions that NPLEX.
It states:
“NDs are broadly trained in the pre-clinical sciences and the clinical disciplines [...and] are educated in all of the same basic sciences and clinical diagnostic methods at the same level as medical and osteopathic doctors [...] the NPLEX Part II Core Clinical Science Examination [...and it mentions] National University of Health Sciences (NUHS), Chicago, IL [...the] Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine program at NUHS."
I think that's the claim of 'same kind of science as preponderant doctoral science'.
But does 'preponderant doctoral science' include PATENT nonscience?
I think not, .gov!
There's the CT Department of Health unsearchable PDF, of very low quality but very large, "The Connecticut Naturopathic Physicians Association Request For A Change In The Scope Of Practice Of Naturopathic Physicians Licensed In Connecticut August 14, 2013" (2014 archived).
The word "science" is in there at least 139 times and "sciences", at least 79 times.
There are such statements as:
"NDs are educated in all of the same basic sciences and clinical diagnostic methods at the same level as medical and osteopathic doctors [...] the University of Bridgeport [...] has a growing Division of Health Sciences committed to providing excellent degree programs in integrative medicine including [...] naturopathic medicine [...] Dr. David Brady, Vice Provost of the UB Division of Health Sciences."
The root "homeop" is in there at least 40 times.
There are such statements as:
"naturopathic treatment modalities include but are not limited to [...] homeopathic medicine [...] as of the August 2007 exam administration, the nine Part II Core Clinical Science Examinations have been integrated into a single, case-based examination that [...includes] homeopathy."
And the abbreviation NPLEX is in there at least 26 times.
There are such statements as:
"naturopathic physicians take a rigorous professional board examination termed the naturopathic Physicians Licensing Exam (NPLEX) [...] Connecticut's overall commitment to patients' health and safety in connection with naturopathic medicine is underscored by Connecticut's requirement that only NDs who have successfully completed the rigorous NPLEX exam are eligible for licensure [...] the purpose of the NPLEX examinations is to ensure that the candidate for licensure has the knowledge necessary to practice safely. The Part I - Biomedical Science Examination is based on competencies established by the faculty of the naturopathic colleges. It assesses the student's level of knowledge needed for clinical training. The Part II - Clinical Science Examination(s) are designed to measure clinical readiness to practice naturopathic medicine, and are based on competencies derived from a job analysis of practicing naturopathic physicians."
I've just quoted the naturopaths assurance that their epistemic rigor leads to "safely", twice.
But HOW does NPLEX -- and how does 'naturopathy's epistemic weirdness' -- insure "safety" if inherently naturopathy continually IGNORES the findings of SCIENCE, such as how naturopathy ignores the VERY TRUE fact that homeopathy is HUGELY SCIENCE-EJECTED?
I've just quoted the naturopaths assurance that their epistemic rigor leads to "safely", twice.
But HOW does NPLEX -- and how does 'naturopathy's epistemic weirdness' -- insure "safety" if inherently naturopathy continually IGNORES the findings of SCIENCE, such as how naturopathy ignores the VERY TRUE fact that homeopathy is HUGELY SCIENCE-EJECTED?
And of course, practicing naturopathic physicians love to label themselves science-based ANYWAY, and practice homeopathy.
So, it's not hard to extrapolate to this circumstance:
with prescription rights, NDs will continue to ignore the findings of science, and therein WON'T be 'practicing safely' in terms of the science of pharmacology.
And if they say:
well, we'll make an EXCEPTION in terms of the science of pharmacology and ACTUALLY adhere to rigorous scientific standards, my question then is:
'why should the OTHER areas within naturopathy NOT get such EQUAL treatment, why should those other 'inherently naturopathic' areas such as homeopathy and kind receive such EPISTEMIC CHARITY? Isn't that HUGELY hypocritical?'
So, it's not hard to extrapolate to this circumstance:
with prescription rights, NDs will continue to ignore the findings of science, and therein WON'T be 'practicing safely' in terms of the science of pharmacology.
And if they say:
well, we'll make an EXCEPTION in terms of the science of pharmacology and ACTUALLY adhere to rigorous scientific standards, my question then is:
'why should the OTHER areas within naturopathy NOT get such EQUAL treatment, why should those other 'inherently naturopathic' areas such as homeopathy and kind receive such EPISTEMIC CHARITY? Isn't that HUGELY hypocritical?'
ND Brady had asked for “fairness and equity as a profession”.
Well, rigorously analyzing naturopathy is TRULY what is fair, equitable and professional.
There is no term medicatrix in the document, according to my OCR'd version.
And the section "Principles of Naturopathic Medicine" codes naturopathy's essential vitalism, merely stating:
"[#6] the healing power of nature: naturopathic medicine recognizes the body's natural healing ability,and trusts that the body has the innate wisdom and intelligence to heal itself if given the proper guidance and tools."
So, you can't even get the principles at the heart of naturopathy TRANSPARENTLY communicated in documents submitted to the State by naturopathy.
So, you can't even get the principles at the heart of naturopathy TRANSPARENTLY communicated in documents submitted to the State by naturopathy.
And there's the ct.gov Department of Public Health web page "Naturopathic Physician Licensing Requirements " (2014 archived) which states:
"in order to be eligible for licensure [in CT], an applicant must have [...] graduated from a school of naturopathy approved by the Connecticut State Board of Naturopathic Examiners and Department of Public Health, with [the] award of the Doctor of Naturopathy degree. Approved schools include only those schools accredited or in candidate status with the Council on Naturopathic Medical Education (CNME) [...and have] successfully completed both the Basic Sciences (Part I) and Clinical Sciences Examination (Part II) of the Naturopathic Physician Licensing Examination (NPLEX)."
Conclusion and an Answer to My Episode Question:
First, I'd like to mention that the State of CT apparently DOES, as in DOES, make EPISTEMIC DISTINCTIONS:
like the distinction between actual science and fake science, aka pseudoscience.
Conclusion and an Answer to My Episode Question:
First, I'd like to mention that the State of CT apparently DOES, as in DOES, make EPISTEMIC DISTINCTIONS:
like the distinction between actual science and fake science, aka pseudoscience.
At the CT
State Department of EDUCATION, sde.ct.gov, in the document "Project CONN-CEPT Science Units" (2014 archived) we're
told:
"astrology is a pseudo-science which links the position of
the stars to human events and behavior."
And I have to ask:
why is 'ASTROLOGY claimed as science' FAKE and FALSE, while the .gov SO EAGERLY promotes naturopathic pseudoscience without telling us it is super-PSEUDO and FAKE?
In other words:
why is it that at LOWER K-12
education levels, much lower than UB's university- and college-DOCTORAL education level,
we have ROBUST epistemic delineation and yet further up, in what
usually is a GREATLY MORE RIGOROUS level, the doctoral level, we have GROSS epistemic
conflation and misrepresentation, we have HUGELY CRAPPY intellectual,
academic, commercial and clinical activity?
I don't have answer,
regarding this UBCNM DISEASE:
the naturopPATHillogical.
By the way, I
highly enjoy the fact that that 'pseudo-science' term containing
sde.ct.gov document has “gifted and talented” in its web address.
I must
admit that I was a TAG student in 5th and 6th grade:
as in, talented and
gifted program, as it was termed in New York State.
Let me return to CNPA's
web pages for a moment.
Now, you might think that the State
organization for naturopaths in Connecticut would be detailed enough,
as opposed to opaque, about VMN, their MOTTO, particularly because,
as I've demonstrated, it is central to the naturopathy sectarian
principle-set.
But, regarding their VMN, you get NOTHING EXPLAINED by
way of CNPA online, currently, that I can find.
Really, nothing at
all.
Searching CNPA, I get presently 1 result for "power".
There's
the CNPA page "Lynnette M. Guida, ND" (2015 archived), who is a former classmate from my time
at UBCNM, who states:
"Dr. Lynnette M. Guida believes […] the
healing power of nature insures that the [...] body has the capacity
to heal itself [...] her wide range of therapeutics includes
homeopathy […] and acupuncture. She received her naturopathic
degree from the University of Bridgeport College of Naturopathic
Medicine [...and] is a member of the American Association of
Naturopathic Physicians [and] the Connecticut Society of Naturopathic
Physicians."
But there's NO contextualization of that HPN aka VMN, there's NO
TRANSPARENCY.
And, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, there's only 1 result for
"medicatrix" at CNPA.
There's the page "2014 Conference Update" (2015 archived) which
mentions "the vis medicatrix naturae" but is in no way
informingly contextualizing.
Wow, how UNINFORMATIVE this whole CNPA online presence is!
Again, it's CNPA's
MOTTO and naturopathy's CENTRAL PREMISE!
Now, in terms of science,
because NDs love using that as a marketing label, as we've seen so
abundantly, you get, for example, the CNPA page "Michael Gazsi, ND" (2015 archived), who is a former instructor I had at
UBCNM, and this actually gets us to medicatrix, in a strange way, because it's misspelled on the page.
ND Gazsi writes:
ND Gazsi writes:
"Dr. Michael Gazsi graduated from the National
College of Naturopathic Medicine in Portland, Oregon [NCNM], the oldest
institution in the United States dedicated to the study and research
of naturopathic sciences [...] naturopathic physicians are primary
care doctors clinically trained in natural therapies. Their
philosophy is […] vis mediatrix [sp., 'medicatrix'] naturae, nature
is the healer of all diseases. Their practice is based on the same,
basic, bio-medical science foundation that allopathic medicine is.
Their philosophies and approaches, though, differ considerably from
their conventional counterparts."
So yes, medicatrix spelled WRONG
by an NCNM graduate at an AANP State chapter.
And that's QUITE the
science claim upon naturopathy by an NCNM graduate:
by way of
“naturopathic sciences”, "same" science “foundation”,
and that slur NDs use for modern medicine that I consider so
inaccurate, “allopathic.”
Do I have to point out the inconsistency
of naturopathy stated as 'based on a philosophy', as in belief-set -- like vitalism and
supernaturalism and kind -- and also stated as equally science as equally science based, WHILE
those contents are SO MUCH SO in huge conflict – as in different
things – at the most fundamental level.
It's like saying 'we're based
on astronomy the science as a foundation, and good things are coming
your way this month because you're a Gemini':
astronomy is not
astrology, by far, and science and 'a belief-set containing the
science-exterior' are not compatible at a most basic of rational
levels.
Aka the naturopathillogical.
And Gazsi is an NCNM graduate,
where we got SO MUCH MORE shown to us online about naturopathy's
innards.
The stuff we don't get IN CT.
Now, when you search the CNPA site
with "to educate", you get "How and Why to Speak to Your Legislator" (2015 archived), which states:
"this
[law modernization] is a joint effort between University of
Bridgeport College of Naturopathic Medicine and the CNPA. UB needs
this law updated so it can more efficiently meet its education
mandate [...] this is the perfect opportunity to educate your local
State Senator and State Representative about the naturopathic medical
profession [...] meeting with legislators establishes a relationship,
provides education and understanding of our profession […] educate
them about your profession and issues."
Excellent, I will be
delivering this Podcast right to them each, 'all them on the PHC'.
And I'll say as I so often
say:
how CAN you be a profession if you are based on falsehood?
How
can you EDUCATE when your own education was MISEDUCATION?
I think UB
naturopathy has other GREATER issues that need to be taken care of
BEFORE increasing its footprint:
like how “science” is FALSELY
used as a categorical label upon contents that patently aren't
science, on what is in fact science-ejected, while over the years UB
has taken SO MUCH MONEY from people based upon these FALSE
premises, labels, and requirements.
This is UNBELIEVABLE:
who has ever heard of a University and
College, fully sanctioned in so many ways, that is NOT meeting its
educational mandate in such a gross manner?
Incidentally, at CNPA, there are
MANY results for homeopathy.
So many, actually.
Let me pick one.
There's
the CNPA page "Darin Ingels, ND" (2015 archived) which
states he uses homeopathy and at his practice he lauds
homeopathy's
“effectiveness”.
According to his bio., the ND is a Bastyr
graduate, the
Washington State institution that claims “science-based” as a
CATEGORICAL label upon the contents of naturopathyland.
In the past, he states, he
has:
“served on the Board of Directors for the Naturopathic
Physicians Licensing Exam (NPLEX) as the chair of microbiology / immunology and homeopathy.”
ND Ingels has an interesting practice.
His diagnostics and therapeutics (2015 archived) there are, shall I venture to say,
fringe
and dubious.
ND
Ingels states he does “assessment” with:
“the Orion, a non-invasive
computer-based electrodermal screening instrument” – EDS -- for
“evaluating sensitivities to many different substances” [I think this is it; and here's Quackwatch's site on EDS].
He tells us the
Orion is “state-of-the-art technology combining the
principles of computer engineering and quantum physics.”
Sure,
sure.
Also, regarding this EDS electrodermal screening, ND Ingels states on one of his practice pages, which is an excerpt from the book “Cutting-Edge Therapies for Autism 2011-2012” (here's the book at Amazon), ISBN
1616082526:
“electrodermal screening (EDS) is an effective method of
determining a child’s sensitivities […] EDS is an effective means
to measure delayed or subtle sensitivities that are often missed
through conventional allergy testing [...and] sublingual
immunotherapy (SLIT) is equally or more effective than allergy shots
in reducing allergy and asthma symptoms […] SLIT is a safe,
effective treatment that should be considered as a first line therapy
for the treatment of allergies and asthma in children with
autism.”
Yet, regarding EDS, at sciencebasedmedicine.org, MD Hall
writes in a 2013 article “Bogus Electrodermal Testing Devices and the Failure of Regulators to Act”:
“electrodermal testing is a bogus procedure where measurements
of skin conductance [...] are entered into a
computer to diagnose nonexistent health problems [...] and to recommend treatments for them, often involving the
sale of homeopathic remedies and other useless products […] I’ve
written about electrodermal testing before. I’ve explained how it
amounts to fooling patients with a computerized Magic 8 Ball […]
claims of FDA approval are false. The people who promote these
devices claim that they are FDA approved. They are not […]
electrodermal testing is clearly bogus and illegal. Inaction on the
part of regulators has allowed it to persist and to defraud
patients.“
Of course, this is naturopathyland.
Who has consumer rights in naturopathyland?
Nobody.
So, what are the ethics of using unapproved diagnostic
devices that then lead to treatments based on the fake results, the unreliable results, the bogus results of those devices?
Who has ever heard of a collection of so-called physicians,
these CNPA members, whose ideas and activities are based on SO MUCH
nonsense and FALSEHOOD carried out with such opacity and .gov
support!
And let me revisit the “toxin boogeyman”
just one more time, this time through UB.
There's UB's web page "Pediatric and Autism Clinic" which states:
"looking at your child from a different point of
view from your conventional pediatrician can help discover if [...]
toxins are adding or causing the symptoms in your child."
And the
catalog "Division of Health Sciences Graduate Programs" speaks
of:
"a current research project [...employing] the use of phase contrast
microscopy to detect circulating toxins in the blood and explore the
implications of endotoxin overload."
Those mythical endotoxins of
naturopathy!
Yet, I don't see how looking through a microscope that's used to image live CELLS is
useful for directly detecting what is actually even so much smaller,
stuff at the chemical level!
Another diagnostic Magic 8 Ball?
But,
don't expect 'toxin boogeyman' stuff to MAKE SENSE.
Because there's no
there there, and they're looking with the wrong instrument anyway, as
far as I can figure out.
Now, An Answer to My Episode Question:
My
Episode 009 question, which is admittedly rather long-winded, is:
“if
naturopathy, at its core, violates preponderant modern values
concerning the physician-patient relationship,
e.g. transparency and
patient empowerment, as opposed to archaic opacity and
paternalism,
and violates preponderant modern boundaries as regards
science,
e.g. that science is a rather specifically defined epistemic
delineation, as opposed to an archaic vague epistemic conflation,
CAN
this political process that is happening this 2015 in Connecticut
accurately be termed modernization? Or is it a kind of
corruption?”
Well, nowhere do I see naturopathy institutions or
individual naturopaths clearly stating that their essential marketing
label "science" is NOT a correct label for naturopathy
categorically speaking.
Nor do they clearly state that their
naturopathy-unique, or as I'd termed in Part 1 "inherent"
therapies and diagnostics, are largely BULLSHIT.
That manipulative
opacity, and what I then interpret as an "it is so because we've
said so" authoritarianism - paternalism – sectarianism, is in
direct violation of modern medical values.
Those values include:
upholding the integrity of science, respecting patient autonomy and therein informed consent, and protecting patient's commercial rights.
upholding the integrity of science, respecting patient autonomy and therein informed consent, and protecting patient's commercial rights.
So, all of that is the opposite of what they're calling
"modernization."
It's a corruption of scientific integrity,
it is a corruption SO MUCH.
It is a REVERSAL of values.
And I'll be
watching what's going on here in Corrupticut, and other states as
well, because it's a lot of fun to do this, honestly, and it feels
good.
Also, for those who wish to pick up the sword AS I HAVE DONE in
this matter, this Episode's transcript will contain links to web
pages at the National Whistleblowers Center for:
c) and
Washington State pertaining law.
The National Whistleblowers Center also has a page for attorney referral, and
they have an online confidential form for reporting fraud.
No comments:
Post a Comment