here, I provide an annotated script for the Naturocrit Podcast's Episode 010 Part 2a, titled “Integrative-Holistic-Quackademic Woo, Information
Asymmetry, Immanence and Fiduciary Duty: Minnesota '.edu'
-Style." In this Part 2a of
Episode 10, I will visit the web pages of the Minnesota Association of Naturopathic Physicians (MNANP) and the web pages of individual Minnesota naturopaths:
001. the Episode 010b1 script and annotations:
Standard Introduction:
Standard Introduction:
Welcome
to, as that robot voice says, The
Naturocrit Podcast, and thank you for boldly listening.
What
ARE we even talking about?
Well,
this podcast series is my take on naturopathic medicine, an area I've
been studying for about twenty years, including my time in so-called
'scientific
nonsectarian naturopathic medical school'.
My
approach is a pairing of scientific
skepticism and a deep knowledge of naturopathy's
intimate details.
In
previous episodes of this series, I established that naturopathy is,
essentially, a kind of knowledge blending, misrepresentation, and
irrationality.
I
have termed naturopathy both 'an epistemic conflation falsely posing
itself as an epistemic delineation' and 'the naturopathillogical':
the
science-exterior is mixed with what is scientific, then that whole
muddle is absurdly claimed to be science as an entire category, while
particular sectarian science-ejected oath-obligations and
-requirements are coded or camouflaged, therein effectively
disguising naturopathy's system of beliefs in public view.
Naturopathy's
ultimate achievement is a profound erosion of scientific
integrity and freedom
of belief packaged in the marketing veneer "natural"
and improperly embedded in the academic category "science".
Episode 10 - Part 2a Introduction:
In this two-part Naturocrit Podcast
Episode 010, titled
“Integrative-Holistic-Quackademic Woo, Information Asymmetry, Immanence and Fiduciary Duty: Minnesota '.edu' -Style”, really,
I am looking at a very rich trove of the NATUROPATHILLOGICAL by way of the University of Minnesota, aka UMN herein, and the Northwestern Health Sciences University, aka NWHSU herein.
“Integrative-Holistic-Quackademic Woo, Information Asymmetry, Immanence and Fiduciary Duty: Minnesota '.edu' -Style”, really,
I am looking at a very rich trove of the NATUROPATHILLOGICAL by way of the University of Minnesota, aka UMN herein, and the Northwestern Health Sciences University, aka NWHSU herein.
Episode Question:
And my overarching episode question for
this Naturocrit Podcast Episode 010 is:
“what does the abundant CATEGORICAL
false labelings of naturopathy's contents as science, as demonstrated
by Minnesota post-secondary academic institutions, indicate regarding
the ethicality of contemporary U.S. higher education, and its regard
for consumer protections and patient informed consent?”
And if you've listened to Part 1, it's
not going well so far for UMN as a microcosm of higher education's
ethicality.
Episode 10 Part 2a Synopsis:
In this Part 2a of Episode 10, I will be longer than usual due to the amount of material I've
uncovered.
I'll visit the web pages of the
Minnesota AANP-affiliated ND state organization, MNANP, and the
individual web pages of Minnesota NDs, including those who are NOT
AANP in-type.
Later, in Part 2b of Episode 10, I'll
visit the second school this episode concerns, NWHSU, and a couple of
pages from national science organizations.
The Minnesota Association of
Naturopathic Physicians (MNANP), Its Officers, and Featured Members:
There's nothing more fun, in terms of
writing about naturopathy, than going through an ND State
organization's web pages, and then an ND organization's members'
practice pages.
Read enough, and NDs spell it all out,
as a certain kind of preponderance, if even inadvertently, through
what you'll see AND what you'll see as common OMISSIONS, as
'manipulative opacities'.
MNANP's current home page address has
been archived since 2004.
Even in 2004, they were hosting a 'we are science' kind of language.
Even in 2004, they were hosting a 'we are science' kind of language.
For instance, there's the grossly
propagandistic 'University of California San Francisco Arkay Report'
[2004 archived] that was linked to from MNANP which contains the root “scien” at
least 58 times and that says such great INVERTED things as:
“the
naturopathic medical profession endeavors to avoid unnecessary
judgment of new methods and theories, but rather to review them
critically, embracing those which stand the test of time and
scientific scrutiny.”
Ah, a claim of profession, criticality,
testing and science WITHOUT, though, "unnecessary judgment"?
Since when is judgment by way of
RIGOROUS analysis “unnecessary”, in such a life-sustaining area
as medicine?
I would think that judgment is the kind
of thing which is an answer to a question, inevitably.
Perhaps they mean:
just say what you want as science, forgo all that ANALYSIS stuff, forgo all that CRITICAL THINKING stuff.
just say what you want as science, forgo all that ANALYSIS stuff, forgo all that CRITICAL THINKING stuff.
So, I get this sense of 'a watering
down of analysis, a lowering of expectations, an unnecessary muddying
of waters':
as in 'judgmentless scientific analysis and criticism',
as in 'a dilution of standards, a contradiction, an oxymorony.'
The Current Board Members of MNANP:
The MNANP page “MNANP Board Members” [2015 archived; also at AANP] states:
“President of the MNANP [and]
Legislative Committee Chair [...is ND] Reinhardt [apparently a 2004
Bastyr ND graduate, whom I can't seem to find a practice page for...]
Vice President of the MNANP [and] Public Relations Committee and
Ethics Committee Chairs [...is ND] Barrett […] Secretary of the
MNANP [and] Membership Committee Chair [...is ND] Montgomery [...]
Treasurer of the MNANP [and] Fund-raising Committee Chair [...is ND]
Corazzo.”
The MNANP's homepage [2015 archived] states that MNANP is:
“[an] affiliate of American
Association of Naturopathic Physicians (AANP).”
I'm not sure if you want that to be
known.
AANP, currently, quite falsely,
postures homeopathy as “medicinal science" [2015 archived] and of “quality“ [2015 archived] while we know homeopathy is
science-ejected JUNK.
MNANP, on that homepage, also states
that naturopathy is:
“holistic healthcare for Minnesota
[...meaning] a naturopathic doctor will take time with you. During
your first appointment, your doctor will take your health history,
find out about your diet, stress levels, use of tobacco and alcohol,
and discuss why you’re there […] naturopathic medicine focuses on
holistic, proactive prevention and comprehensive diagnosis and
treatment.”
So, “holistic” with no mention of
the supernatural, just this idea that 'a long time will be spent'
with you the patient, and the redundancy “proactive prevention” –
as opposed to, I guess, 'retroactive prevention' for those with time
machines – and this idea of being “comprehensive.”
Promises, promises and incomplete
contexts.
We're additionally told:
“[MNANP is] the professional
organization for naturopathic doctors in Minnesota […with] the
mission of the MNANP […to] support strong professional standards
for our members […and to] increase public awareness of and access
to natural and integrative medicine throughout the Midwest.”
So, as well as an 'of the professions'
claim, there's the language “natural and integrative.”
Should “strong professional
standards” include a false claim that homeopathy is effective?
I don't think so.
Because MNANP states, regarding
homeopathy, on the page “Naturopathic Medicine” [vsc 2015-07-16]:
“[homeopathy is an] effective system
of medicine [...] that can stimulate the body's self-healing response
[…] homeopathy works on a […] powerful energetic level gently
acting to promote healing on the physical, mental, and spiritual
level.”
Now, I've never asked this so let me
ask it:
how would one know that we've affected 'the spiritual'?
how would one know that we've affected 'the spiritual'?
I've mentioned the idea of 'immanence'
at the beginning of this episode, the idea that the divine and
spiritual are somehow, within that belief system, amenable.
But HOW would one know?
It would seem to me that all the things
that people would say about how they feel, what they're thinking, and
how they are behaving are matters of PSYCHOLOGY, and psychology is mundane and secular, last time I checked [as a social science].
So, therein, naturopathy's WIDE belief
system includes this interaction with the supernatural which they
call “treat the whole person” usually, which is way beyond psychology, and is religiousness, as in WAY BEYOND the mundane and
parsimonious, as in metaphysical, of belief within that context
and kind, because it involves treating that which is supernatural,
because it involves supernatural goals.
This is a particular belief system, and
therein a sectarianism.
Naturopaths are labeled on the homepage
as “doctors who listen” who are “experts in natural medicine.“
Yes, the supernatural is WITHIN their
idea of what is natural.
The homepage tells us of:
“the healing
power of nature […] healing in the human body […] the ability of
the human body to heal or achieve balance, naturally […] the body’s
inherent ability to restore and maintain optimal health.”
That's all coded vitalism.
How strongly professional!
And we're told:
“naturopathic doctors combine the wisdom of nature with the rigors of modern science.”
“naturopathic doctors combine the wisdom of nature with the rigors of modern science.”
That is an admission of BLENDING, by the
way, which BELIES that categorical “science-based” label that UMN
employed.
We're promised by MNANP:
“naturopathic
doctors keep themselves up-to-date on the latest scientific research
and incorporate this evidence into their treatments.”
That's SCIENCE, again.
And I believe what happens is when the
science contradicts naturopathy's core beliefs and activities –
that which they cherish – well, science is then NOT SO INCORPORATED
into naturopathy:
such as homeopathy being totally
rubbished by science, naturopathy denying this reality, and to this
day claiming homeopathy is a “clinical science” [2015 archived].
Such a Holy Cow for them.
As the World Naturopathy Federation states in their 2015-06 publication
“World Naturopathic Federation Report” [2015 archived], which is a document deserving an
episode in-itself:
“naturopathic terms […] the German
origin of the word naturopathy, naturheilkunde, was first used in
Europe over 200 years ago […] the term naturheilkuner was also used
by Kneipp, teacher of Dr. John Scheel and Dr. Benedict Lust.
Naturheilkuner was translated to naturopathy and first coined in 1885
by Dr. John Scheel, a German homeopath […] Benedict Lust […] the
father of modern naturopathy in North America, purchased the name in
1901 to describe the eclectic practice of 'nature doctors'.”
The AANP actually has a position paper on homeopathy called "House of Delegates Position Paper Homeopathy" [2015 archived] that states:
"homeopathy has been an integral part of naturopathic medicine since its inception [...] homeopathy has been recognized, through rigorous testing and experimentation, as having significant scientific evidence supporting its efficacy and safety."
The AANP actually has a position paper on homeopathy called "House of Delegates Position Paper Homeopathy" [2015 archived] that states:
"homeopathy has been an integral part of naturopathic medicine since its inception [...] homeopathy has been recognized, through rigorous testing and experimentation, as having significant scientific evidence supporting its efficacy and safety."
Really.
So homeopathy, by way of the World Naturopathic Federation, was there since the beginning, and AANP actually reinforces this idea of homeopathy being baked-in to naturopathy.
So, as you can see, naturopathy is intrinsically wed to homeopathy:
this Holy Cow is in naturopathy's DNA.
And MNANP's science claims are categorical, in terms of members, as opposed to say, a-la-cart.
MNANP tells us in its “Naturopathic Doctor Directory” [2015 archived]:
“Bradley Bush, ND […] Dr Bush takes
a holistic, yet science-based approach to medicine […] Peter
Glidden, ND […] his website, drglidden.com is dedicated to
providing the very latest information regarding science-based,
clinically verified wholistic medical treatments […and our friend]
Paul Ratté, ND […] Dr. Paul Ratté is an assistant professor of
nutrition at Northwestern Health Sciences University in Bloomington.”
So, science subset naturopathy, and
simultaneously the “wholistic […or] holistic.”
ND Bush had spelled that holistic word
with an “h” while ND Glidden spelled it with a “wh”, but I do
believe they are interchangeable.
And there's mention of that second
Minnesota school, NWHSU, which we'll visit later on in this episode.
So, lets take a look now at those three
NDs just mentioned.
NDs Bush:
ND Rebecca Bush and ND Bradley Bush,
both of NCNM [2015 saved], practice at stillwaternatural.com.
At their homepage [2015 saved; also here also here also here] we're told:
“our alternative medical approach
offers you new hope through advanced diagnostics and
non-pharmaceutical treatments. We offer a holistic, yet science-based
approach to your health."
So, selling “science-based […] alternative […] holistic […] hope.”
So, selling “science-based […] alternative […] holistic […] hope.”
And the practice has NO explanation, AT
ALL, of naturopathy's principles that I can find, though:
science is supposed to be transparent and hope is not supposed to be EMPTY MANIPULATION.
science is supposed to be transparent and hope is not supposed to be EMPTY MANIPULATION.
“Detox” is promoted as well as diets that “strengthen your immune system” [2015 archived], oth of which theories are STRONGLY
criticized by science as false theories:
a) sciencebasedmedicine.org has the
article "The Detox Scam: How To Spot It, And How To Avoid It";
b) Harvard Medical School tells us in
“How to Boost Your Immune System“:
“for now, there are no scientifically
proven direct links between lifestyle and enhanced immune function
[…] be skeptical: many products on store shelves claim to boost or
support immunity. But the concept of boosting immunity actually makes
little sense scientifically […] walk into a store, and you will
find bottles of pills and herbal preparations that claim to 'support
immunity' or otherwise boost the health of your immune system.
Although some preparations have been found to alter some components
of immune function, thus far there is no evidence that they actually
bolster immunity to the point where you are better protected against
infection and disease."
ND Glidden:
Glidden is a 1991 Bastyr ND graduate [2015 archived].
He is a HUGE basher of conventional
medicine while he promotes – let's say, generously – DUBIOUS cancer therapies [2015 saved] and supplements.
He is the host,
after all, of the “The Fire Your MD Now Show” and he is a
promoter of nutritional supplements by way of Joel Wallach, an NCNM
ND graduate.
Regarding Dr. Wallach, the very
comprehensive article at the Skeptic's Dictionary “Joel D. Wallach, the 'Mineral Doctor'” states:
“Wallach is not a physician, but an
N.D., a doctor of naturopathy. It is unlikely that most of the people
in his audiences know that naturopaths aren't really physicians [I
honestly would call them metaphysicians] and that there is a big
difference between an M.D. and an N.D. He also claims he did hundreds
of autopsies on humans while working as a veterinarian in St. Louis.
How does a veterinarian get to do human autopsies? [...quoting
Wallach] 'well, again, to make a long story short, over a period of
some twelve years I did 17,500 autopsies on over 454 species of
animals and 3,000 human beings who lived in close proximity to the
zoos, and the thing I found out was this: every animal and every
human being who dies of natural causes dies of a nutritional
deficiency' […] if he really did do all those autopsies and then
concluded that every animal or human who dies of natural causes dies
because of a nutritional deficiency, then he qualifies for the
Ignoble or Ignoramus Prize. To accomplish his autopsy feat, he would
have to have done six autopsies a day, working 5 days a week for 12
years, taking only a 2-week vacation each year. He was allegedly
performing all these autopsies in addition to his other duties and
presumably while he was writing essays and books as well.”
What fun!
These are the joys of studying
naturopathy, if you can put up with the discomfort of working with
people who may have lost touch with reality or try to avoid reality at all
cost.
ND Glidden
repeats the science-based claim at his own drglidden.com in “Become an Insider” [2015 archived] wherein we're told, or one might say
hawked at:
“[text] many people who are looking
for a better way, a natural solution that is RESULTS oriented,
science-based and clinically verified, come to find that Dr. Glidden
has the answers they were looking for […] he looks to teach you how
you can support your body’s ability to fix itself. There is a way,
and healing is easy [...video] there are simple solutions […] the
holistic understanding of your illness […] for most chronic health
conditions […] healing is easy […] but they are not going to be
offered to you by a conventional medical doctor […] the
conventional medical perspective on your illness [...and only] a
handful […] of naturopathic physicians [know about...] these health
recovery strategies […] in order to support and optimize your
body's ability to optimize its structure and function […] in order
to spread Dr. Wallach's message [...and this is] science-based.”
He mentions, in a bizarre video “The Night Before Naturopathy By Dr. Glidden” [2015 saved], such naturopathy sources as Hahnemann
and Kent in terms of naturopathy's homeopathy, and Pizzorno and
Mitchell in terms of naturopathy's Bastyr University.
It is, by the way, ND Pizzorno who
tells us that he “coined” the term “science based natural
medicine” to describe naturopathy in the late 1970s, and it is ND
Pizzorno who, in his book “Total Wellness” tells us that “life
force” the thing running the body in naturopathy's belief system, is
also known as “spirit.”
And also,
regarding ND Pizzorno, ND Glidden has an interview up with ND
Pizzorno titled “Dr. Glidden Interviews Dr. Joseph Pizzorno | The Fire Your MD Now Show” which will be very useful for a future podcast episode [the coined thing shows up there].
ND Ratte's Web Pages:
ND Ratte is a 1997 NCNM graduate.
In “About Paul Ratte”, at
tailormadenutrition.com [2015 archived], we're told:
“Paul Ratté ND is a naturopathic
doctor who specializes in functional medicine. He is an assistant
professor of clinical nutrition at Northwestern Health Sciences
University […] Paul empowers clients to take control of their
health by improving digestion, enhancing detoxification, regulating
blood sugar, and balancing hormones […] Paul […] provides
nutritional and supplement support for a wide variety of conditions
[...such as] chronic fatigue, chronic digestive disorders, obesity
and diabetes, autoimmune disease, cardiovascular disease, thyroid
disease, autism spectrum disorder, depression and anxiety, sleep
disturbance, cancer […] visit www.paulratte.com for more
information.”
I think that's a claim of science
subset naturopathy subset functional medicine.
There's also detoxification, a wide
net, and a further web page.
At his practice page bio., “Paul Ratte, N.D.” [2015 archived], which currently is paulratte.com
forwarding to rhythmofhealth.com, we're told:
“Paul Ratté, ND […is] a passionate
proponent of integrated health care [...a] naturopathic doctor
[…graduate of] National College of Naturopathic Medicine [NCNM…] 1997
[…] active member of the MN Association of Naturopathic Physicians
[MNANP…] an assistant professor at Northwestern Health Sciences
University in Bloomington, MN [...and he practices at] Rhythm of
Health, Inc. in Woodbury, MN [...he] is an authority on functional
medicine, a science-based health care approach.”
So, science subset the naturopathic
subset the integrated subset functional medicine, and mention of
NCNM.
ND Ratte's "Clinic Introduction Letter" PDF [2015 archived] tells us:
"I look forward to providing you
with high quality, natural healthcare […] great health is a choice
AND a commitment […] my goal is to empower you to manage your own
health."
So, promised empowerment and quality,
high quality.
So, what happens when someone really
tries hard and doesn't get better, by the way, through this route?
Did they NOT choose to be better, did they not
COMMIT enough to be better?
It's sounds like an out for the ND:
you
didn't reach the promises I made, 'the patient is to blame', when
things don't work out.
Now, you'll see a lot of NDs in
Minnesota doing Functional Medicine.
At the Wikipedia article on functional medicine, we're told:
“functional medicine encompasses a
number of unproven and disproven methods and treatments [sounds like
that's right up naturopathy's ally], and has been criticized for
being pseudoscientific […] the discipline of functional medicine is
vaguely defined by its proponents. Oncologist David Gorski has
written that the vagueness is a deliberate tactic which facilitates
the discipline's promotion, but that in general it centers around
unnecessary and expensive testing procedures performed in the name of
'holistic' health care. Functional medicine significantly departs
from mainstream medicine in its emphasis on treatments and concepts
of health and disease which are not currently known to be effective
or which have been shown to be ineffective by clinical research.
These include orthomolecular medicine, detoxification of undocumented
toxins, 'biochemical individuality', organ reserve, diagnosis of
chronic occult infections, homeopathy including 'biopuncture', the
injection of homeopathic remedies, dubious nutritional interventions,
including avoidance of gluten for people who do not have celiac
disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity, antivaccine advocacy
including promotion of the discredited link between MMR vaccine and
autism, [and] leaky gut syndrome […] the opening of centers for
functional medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and at George
Washington University has been described by Gorski as an
'unfortunate' example of pseudoscientific quackery infiltrating
medical academia.”
And then, obviously, being practiced by
the graduates of such institutions.
Now, at his home page, ND Ratte states:
“Dr. Ratté maintains a naturopathic
medical clinic [...in] Woodbury, MN […] naturopathic medicine is a
distinct primary health care profession, emphasizing prevention,
treatment and optimal health through the use of therapeutic methods
and substances which encourage the person’s inherent self-healing
process, the vis medicatrix naturae.”
And if you remember, he's an NCNM
graduate.
And oh how so much is being omitted
regarding vis medicatrix naturae there.
Patient's don't deserve to know, so
they can then decide.
Informed consent does not apparently
matter.
Well, I've looked over his practice
pages and I don't see a transparent, INFORMATIVE explanation of the
basis of naturopathy and its essential context.
Since ND Ratte says naturopathy is
“distinct” and 'of the professions', and “science”, and a
CHOICE, I find that odd, to say the least.
How can I CHOOSE without the
information I need to make an INFORMED decision?
Of course, at his alma mater, NCNM, you
CAN find what SHP-VMN is, and naturopathy's essentials, since NCNM is
what I'll call the trunk of the tree:
SHP-VMN is the science-ejected concept called vitalism, falsely posed as 'able to survive scientific scrutiny', with so many other things there.
Which means, conceptually, that naturopathy is all about epistemic conflation and falsehood:
blending knowledge types and then improperly labeling them ALL one knowledge type, and then hiding that fact on their 'practitioner peripheral offshoots'.
DOESN'T that put ALL CLAIMS by this ND into a category of HIGHLY SUSPECT in the sense of manipulative opacity and incompetency?
It does in my view.
And yet you will be to blame when things don't get better!
And ND Ratte is HIGHLY CITED at both of the schools this episode concerns.
SHP-VMN is the science-ejected concept called vitalism, falsely posed as 'able to survive scientific scrutiny', with so many other things there.
Which means, conceptually, that naturopathy is all about epistemic conflation and falsehood:
blending knowledge types and then improperly labeling them ALL one knowledge type, and then hiding that fact on their 'practitioner peripheral offshoots'.
DOESN'T that put ALL CLAIMS by this ND into a category of HIGHLY SUSPECT in the sense of manipulative opacity and incompetency?
It does in my view.
And yet you will be to blame when things don't get better!
And ND Ratte is HIGHLY CITED at both of the schools this episode concerns.
More NDs:
AANP-type NDs:
Here, now, are about twenty Minnesota
NDs who were listed at the MNANP, who's web pages I'm going to
excerpt from in alphabetical order.
ND
Aberle:
The ND is, according to her bio. [2015 archived], a 2001 NCNM
graduate and
“Minnesota’s first registered naturopathic doctor.”
Regarding
NCNM, she states it is:
“considered to be one of America’s top
medical schools by the Princeton Review.”
Yes, the
naturopathillogical has infected even the guides that students use to
determine their future education, particularly graduate school
education.
I'll put a pin in that too, as a reminder for a future
podcast episode, because it's just HORRIBLE how naturopathy's
falsehoods are inducing students into massive debt and deflecting
them from legitimate areas of study.
And on this bio. page, we're
told of:
“functional medicine […and] integrated care […and we're
told, I SHIT YOU NOT] this year Dr. Aberle will be participating in
an ongoing international study of homeoprophylaxis, an alternative to
conventional vaccination.”
Wonderful.
Yes, vaccination by way of:
magic beans, unicorn tears, and flying carpets.
The horror, the
horror.
And she states:
“currently Dr. Aberle is serving as a member
of the advisory panel for naturopathic medicine for the Minnesota
Board of Medical Practice.”
Her motto on the page is:
"my
success as a doctor is based on putting my patients back in charge of
their health. When they make their health decisions, they get
better. It's that simple."
Promise, promises by naturopathy,
which is not that simple.
On the page “Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told that 'the essentially naturopathic' survives scientific scrutiny
by way of:
“[as] a distinct system [...as a system that's]
distinguished […] naturopathic medicine is defined primarily by its
fundamental principles. Methods and modalities are selected and
applied based upon these principles [...including] homeopathy
[…naturopathy's] principles are based upon the objective
observation of the nature of health and disease, and are continually
reexamined in the light of scientific advances […including
principle #1] the healing power of nature (vis medicatrix naturae):
the healing power of nature is the inherent self-organizing and
healing process of living systems which establishes, maintains and
restores health. Naturopathic medicine recognizes this healing
process to be ordered and intelligent. It is the naturopathic
physician's role to support, facilitate and augment this process […]
naturopathic physicians respect and work with the vis medicatrix
naturae.“
So, again and again and again, we see NCNM graduates NOT
USING so much of the language that NCNM provides at NCNM when NCNM
defines naturopathy.
And I call this 'manipulative opacity or
coding':
the vitalism and “life force” that dare not speak its
name.
They “respect” that VMN, but they don't respect the public
enough to be transparent about it.
We're told “total health also
includes spiritual health”, so, therein within this science claim, is
supernaturalism.
Line them up for their Nobel Prizes.
She has a page
“Homeoprophylaxis Program: An Alternative Ahead Of Its Time.”
Homeopathy
is as ahead of its time as phlogiston, in my view.
The page
states:
“homeoprophylaxis offers another way […] Edgewater Natural
Family Medicine offers a free 15 minute phone consultation to discuss
your questions about your children's suitability for this alternative
and researched program. If you decide to proceed we will enroll your
children in both the research project and also take them on as a
patient, which allows us to help you manage all aspects of your
child's health as they grow as physical, mental, and spiritual
beings.”
Ah, 'we will manage your child's spiritual aspects'.
Again,
how would you know?
I don't even think the believer KNOWS, the
believer BELIEVES.
And an EXPERIMENT:
a homeopathy vaccination
alternative.
Is there an IRB and such in place to insure the
ethicality of this homeopathic vaccination misadventure?
Of course,
how could such a misadventure get of the ground in the first place
once it is initially posed, if we are going to be ethical?
ND Aberle
has a page on highly debunked IgG food allergy testing titled “Food Allergies”
“IgG
food allergy testing: most of our clients choose to do the IgG food
allergy test to help determine what their allergies are. The test we
use is performed using a few drops of blood from a finger stick or
from a blood draw. The IgG antibodies test for delayed sensitivity
reactions, which means they may not have a reaction for 24-72 hours
after exposure to the offending substance […] you will have the
option of simply doing the IgG test only as these reactions are much
harder to detect without the help of labs.”
As Scott Gavura of
sciencebasedmedicine.org states in “IgG Food Intolerance Tests: What Does The Science Say?”:
“these
tests lack both a sound scientific rationale and evidence of
effectiveness. The lack of correlation between results and actual
symptoms, and the risks resulting from unnecessary food avoidance,
escalate the potential for harm from this test.”
And just as an
aside, I have to say THANKS to Scott for linking to my Naturocrit
blog on his blog roster, at his very excellent science-based pharmacology blog.
ND
Barkeim:
The ND is another NCNM graduate, and we're told, on her bio. page [2015 archived]:
“I
searched high and low for a career that involved helping people
address their health physically, mentally, and emotionally.”
Wait:
ND Aberle talked of “body [...] mind [...] spirit” and ND Barkeim MERELY “physically, mentally, and emotionally."
ND Aberle talked of “body [...] mind [...] spirit” and ND Barkeim MERELY “physically, mentally, and emotionally."
And she is an NCNM
graduate, a school that states when defining naturopathy, that
supernaturalism survives scientific scrutiny and is inherent to 'the
essentially naturopathic.'
She is either not encompassing the
essentially naturopathic or she is coding that supernaturalism.
The
emotional and the spiritual are NOT the same things, unless one of
them is naturalistic CODING of that supernatural 'spiritual'
thing.
Because I don't think it's too hard in terms of modern
healthcare to find a career that addresses what is physical, mental,
and emotional: as in the biopsychosocial model that modern medicine
and modern psychology embraces.
But it is naturopathy and not modern
medicine that contains the supernatural, as a fundamental idea, so
therein, me thinks we've got coded supernaturalism here by way of the
ND.
Like so many THINGS, I guess emotions and spirits are callously
categorized as 'just about the same thing' in naturopathyland, and
that's when I wonder about naturopathy's callousness regarding,
especially, freedom of belief and informed consent.
Contextual
granularity and transparency be damned, in naturopathyland.
Her bio.
page also states she has a “bachelor of science in school and
community education.”
Yet, even at the bachelor's level, patent
nonscience is patent nonscience.
Hell, even at the elementary level,
patent nonscience is patent nonscience.
ND Barkeim's homepage
[2015 archived] states:
"naturopathic
medicine is based on science and rooted in nature. I offer natural,
holistic, and integrative care. I believe in treating the root cause
of illness […and ] I use natural therapies that are safe and
effective."
A science claim, an efficacy claim, the holistic, root
causes – that dog whistle, that kind of says 'hey, we're not like
regular medicine, we don't just treat symptoms' – and natural.
On the
ND's page “Frequently Asked Questions” [2015 archived] we're
given what I like to call 'naturopathy's superscience claim', wherein
ND Barkeim compiles the science hours of NDs and MDs, and claims NDs
have as much if not more SCIENCE.
As is typical:
that superscience of naturopathy claim.
But quantity does not guarantee quality, in so many ways.
that superscience of naturopathy claim.
But quantity does not guarantee quality, in so many ways.
Also, ND Barkeim states:
“naturopathic medicine uses a
holistic approach [...] homeopathy is a safe and effective treatment
[…] naturopathic physicians use safe and effective natural
medicine.”
Right, bullshit.
And there's:
“craniosacral therapy
[…which is supposedly] a gentle therapy that is effective for
adults, children, and infants.”
So I say:
holistic 'safe and effective
JUNK.
And we're told:
“the 6 core principles of naturopathic medicine
include […] the healing power of nature. Our bodies have a powerful
instinct to heal themselves. Our job is to help you identify
obstacles and ways to overcome them.”
And that's all you get.
Again,
isn't something that's scientific supposed to be transparent?
And that
horrid label is used by the ND, by way of:
“conventional
(allopathic) medical doctors.”
That's what I call 'the reverse sectarian
accusation', which is as true as calling modern chemistry alchemy.
Her
page “Our Mission and Vision”
[2015 archived] states:
“we
are dedicated to providing quality healthcare […] the best care […]
we strive to motivate, inspire, and empower each patient.“
As if.
ND
Barrett:
The ND's bio. [2014 archived] tells us she is an SCNM ND graduate, and the
vice president of the
MNANP, and
that:
“Dr. Barrett has also studied under various internationally
renowned homeopathic experts, including Dr. Stephen Messer, ND,
DHANP, and Dr. Andre Saine, ND, FCAH.”
DHANP is “diplomate of the
Homeopathic Academy of Naturopathic Physicians” and FCAH is “fellow
of the Canadian Academy of Homeopathy.”
On her homepage, the ND speaks
of [2015 archived]:
“redefining healthcare with natural,
holistic care for the whole person […] NDs work with science-based
health and wellness practices […such as] homeopathy.”
Definitely
the idea of what is “science-based” is truly 'redefined' by this
ND, as she was taught in naturopathyland.
As if:
'science is whatever
we want it to be, because, we pretend that we can decide what science
is'.
In
“Frequently Asked Questions” [vsc
2015-07-26] we're told:
“homeopathy is a distinct form of medicine
[…] homeopathy can treat both acute and chronic ailments […]
homeopathy is one of the many modalities used by naturopathic doctors
[…] naturopathic doctors incorporate herbal medicine, diet,
supplementation, homeopathy and other treatment modalities to best
suite their patient's needs.”
And I would argue:
the best placebo's around.
the best placebo's around.
The ND also writes there:
“a naturopathic doctor has
completed a four year naturopathic medical education, passed the
NPLEX board exam and holds a license to practice naturopathic
medicine. Naturopathic doctors treat patients as a whole person and
look for the root cause of their concerns. Naturopathic doctors
believe in the body's innate ability to heal itself and work with
their patients to stimulate that healing process.”
So much coding,
and that NPLEX is the licensure exam that falsely labels homeopathy a
“clinical science.”
In “Naturopathic Medicine” [vsc 2015-07-26], we get that categorical false
claim of 'science
subset the naturopathic', since we're
told:
“naturopathic doctors cooperate with all other branches of
medical science […] naturopathic and allopathic practices are based
on the same basic biomedical science foundation […] naturopathic
education includes […] homeopathy […regarding] doctorates in
naturopathic medicine […one school is] National University of
Health Sciences […] naturopathic medicine uses therapies that are
safe and effective.”
How FALSE!
And we're told there:
“the six
principles that guide the therapeutic methods of naturopathic
medicine include […] the healing power of nature, vis medicatrix
naturae: the human body possesses the inherent ability to restore
health. the naturopathic doctor's role is to facilitate this process
[…] vis medicatrix naturae, 'nature is the healer of all
diseases.'"
Again, coded vitalism.
And we're told:
“naturopathic
medicine blends” yet, to be science, you must be an epistemic
distinction and transparent, not an epistemic muddle and opaque.
The ND also has the blog post “Boost Your Immune System for Fall” [vsc 2015-08-07].
And
she has a Youtube video up titled “Meet Dr. Barrett” [vsc
2015-07-26] wherein she talks about having:
“attended a four-year
medical school [...being] board-certified [...and that what she does
is] empowering [...and she refers us to the AANP at]
naturopathic.org.”
Usually, in medicine, if you are board-certified
you are a highly trained and competent specialist, but in naturopathy,
it merely means you've passed the NPLEX, and that you are licensed,
and that you think science is anything, like homeopathy and
kind.
NDs
Champion:
Both NDs are SCNM ND grads [here; 2015 archived].
Their
practice homepage [2015 archived] states:
“our
practice provides holistic, natural medicine for the entire family.
Join the many others who are turning to naturopathic medicine to
enhance their quality of life and achieve optimal health. Here at
CNH we utilize safe, gentle, and effective therapies that work to
stimulate your body’s amazing ability to heal itself. We do not
believe in merely treating or suppressing symptoms. Our goal is to
identify and treat the underlying cause.”
So, holistic, natural, effective, coded
vitalism, and that dog whistle 'not just doing cookie-cutter
allopathic medicine'.
In “Our Practice FAQs” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic doctors (ND’s) attend four-year graduate-level
naturopathic medical schools and are educated in the same basic
sciences as in conventional medical school. The ND program features a
wide variety of effective natural therapies with a strong foundation
in biomedical sciences such as anatomy, physiology, biochemistry and
pathology along with physical, clinical, and laboratory diagnosis […]
in addition to being licensed naturopathic doctors [...NDs Champion]
attended SCNM and received one of the best homeopathic medical
educations available. They completed many additional clinical
training hours [...] in studying the art and science of homeopathy
from some of the world’s leading homeopaths, including Dr. André
Saine, ND, DC and Dr. Stephen Messer, ND, DHANP. They have also
completed post-doctoral classes/training through the Canadian Academy
of Homeopathy, taught by Dr. André Saine.”
So, science, effective,
natural, homeopathic, and a specific science claim upon homeopathy.
In
“About Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic doctors (ND’s) are primary care physicians
clinically trained in natural therapeutics and whose philosophy is
derived in part from a Hippocratic teaching more than 2000 years old:
vis medicatrix naturae, nature is the healer of all diseases. Their
practice is based on the same basic bio-medical science foundation
that allopathic practice is […] 6 principles: the six principles
that guide the therapeutic methods and modalities of naturopathic
medicine include […] the healing power of nature (vis medicatrix
naturae): the human body possesses the inherent ability to restore
health. The physician’s role is to facilitate this process with the
aid of natural, nontoxic therapies.”
So, a science claim upon what's
contextually essentially naturopathic, allopathic, natural, and coded
vitalism.
In “About Homeopathic Treatments” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“homeopathy is a scientific method of treatment.”
Really, in
this day and age, this 2015, that HUGE FALSE POSITION.
The ND is an SCNM graduate [here; 2015 archived].
ND
Christianson:
The ND is an SCNM graduate [here; 2015 archived].
At
the practice's homepage, we're told:
“[naturopathy] it is a practice
of medicine that addresses the basic fundamentals of health and
encourages the body to heal from within […] to understand
naturopathy one should know what principles it was founded on […]
the pillars founding naturopathic medicine […] vis medicatrix
naturae: to act in cooperation with the healing power of nature […]
the treatment plans work on the body as a whole and are designed with
holistic intent […] the training includes both western medical
practices and the best of the natural healing systems from around the
world.”
Ah, coded vitalism, holistic, and best.
In
“Services” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“[therapeutic] modalities include but are not limited to […]
homeopathy.”
And the ND has a “Homeopathic Intake Form” [2015 archived] which
basically asks such important medical questions as:
'which shoe to you
put on first in the morning?'
As far as I can tell, by the way, the ND
does not use the words science, sciences, or scientific on his web
practice pages.
The ND has a supposed 'informed consent' in his document
“Brief Intake” [2015 archived] which
states:
“the purpose of this document is to inform you
[...regarding] naturopathic therapeutic modalities […] the choice
to receive naturopathic care is your independent decision […] an
informed decision […] I, the undersigned, have been informed of,
and understand, the nature [how ironic], risks, and possible complications and
consequences of naturopathic treatment.”
But, as far as I can tell,
the ND does not explain on his web pages 'what is epistemically
essential about naturopathy':
pseudoscience, like the pseudoscientific
status of the homeopathy he offers, wrongly terms “best”, and
makes a living from.
He couldn't even transparently communicate what
HPN essentially is.
I'll provide a link to SCNM's catalog [2015 archived], his alma
mater, stating that a central therapeutic goal of naturopathy
is:
“tonify weakened systems [...e.g.] harmonize life force”, an
iteration of the science-ejected concept of vitalism, falsely posed
as a scientific system within the
body.
Overall,
I can't see how someone who read all this stuff would be informed
enough to consent in an informed manner.
The ND is an SCNM graduate [here; 2015 archived].
ND
Corazzo:
The ND is an SCNM graduate [here; 2015 archived].
On her homepage [2015 archived] we're
told:
“providing alternative treatments
using holistic health care to address the root cause of disease.”
So,
there's holistic and that idea that 'naturopathy gets to the essential
cause'.
In “Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic
doctors (ND) attend a 4 year post-baccalaureate medical school.
Naturopathic doctors look for the underlying cause of disease and use
the least invasive, cutting edge natural therapies for treatment. The
heart of naturopathic medicine is diet and nutrition, but it also
provides a variety of tools such as herbs, supplements, homeopathy,
and hydrotherapy. Naturopathic doctors feel its important to spend an
adequate amount of time with each patient in order to treat
holistically, provide individualized care and to discover the cause
of disease […] naturopathic doctors practice under the 5
naturopathic principles [...including] co-operate with the healing
power of nature trusting the body’s ability to heal itself.“
So,
“medical school”, homeopathy, holistic, underlying cause, and
coded vitalism.
In “Naturopathic Education” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic doctors attend one of the 6 accredited
naturopathic medical schools throughout the US and Canada. The first
two years involve basic science courses […] naturopathic doctors
must pass 2 sets of boards to become board certified doctors. The
first set is before their third year and covers the basic sciences.
The second set is following graduation.”
So, as if “basic”
science as in 'based upon science', and that NPLEX.
In “Natural Remedies” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“food is a powerful medicine […] detox / cleanse […] by
cleaning out the toxins in your body with Dr. Katie’s 21 Day Detox
Program. There are numerous health benefits and a detox can help you
improve your health and lifestyle for the long run […] we are
exposed to toxins in our air, food, and homes daily. Reducing our
toxic burden is one way to prevent disease. When toxins have reaped
havoc on our bodies naturopathic medicine uses the most advanced
testing to determine where the imbalance lies. Detoxing is one way to
help reduce the burden and often times treat the underlying cause of
imbalance in the body […] homeopathy is the use of a very small
amount of medicine. There are thousands of different remedies and it
is truly an art to find the most effective remedy for the
patient.”
So, there's that huge overstatement regarding 'food as if
medicine', detox and toxins -- what I like to call 'the Toxin Bogeyman' -- and homeopathy as if effective.
In
“Homeopathy” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic medicine['s…] homeopathy is a form of natural
alternative medicine with the use of diluted medicines given mainly
in tablet form to aid the body in its natural healing process.
Homeopathic remedies are prescribed based on the 'like treating like'
theory […] modern homeopathy has been used for the past 200 years.
Naturopathic doctors receive extensive training in homeopathy and Dr.
Katie uses homeopathic remedies with many of her patients […]
homeopathy can be used for a wide variety of conditions, because
there are thousands of remedies covering a range of symptoms and
constitutions. Dr. Katie has found homeopathy to be very effective at
treating anxiety, depression, ADHD, insomnia, colds, digestive
complaints, pain, and more. Homeopathic remedies are diluted through
a very precise method making them much safer than pharmaceutical
medications. Homeopathy is very effective when used with adults or
children […as] holistic medicine.”
So homeopathy, again, as if
effective.
In “Detox / Cleanse” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“do I need to detox or cleanse? A 14 or 21 day detox is a
time to cleanse the body of toxins and waste and allow the body to
heal. We ingest toxins from our food, water, and air every day
therefore its important to give you body a break periodically. Dr.
Katie has designed a 14 and 21 day detox program that can be tailored
to your needs and goals. A detox or cleanse generally results in
weight loss, increased energy, improved digestion, clearer thinking,
disease prevention, and decreased pain and inflammation. Dr. Katie’s
detox program focuses on supporting the liver and elimination
pathways – intestinal tract, skin, lungs, and kidneys. Eliminating
unhealthy habits and replacing them with health provoking habits is
the ultimate goal you can expect to achieve after the 21 day detox.
Have you ever thought about doing a juice or water fast? There is an
option to try one during the detox […] alternative medicine: a
detox can jump start your weight loss, reduce cholesterol, improve
insulin sensitivity, decrease blood pressure, reduce joint pain and
inflammation, and much more. Dr. Katie’s Detox Program is safe and
will help you reach your health goals. Holistic medicine: this detox
is your chance to give your body a deep cleaning.”
Toxins, toxins,
toxins.
In “Treating Anxiety Naturally with Dr. Katie Corazzo” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“homeopathy is the primary treatment I use because it is safe,
easy, affordable, and very effective.”
So, let's torture people with
psychological issues, by giving them empty remedies aka homeopathy.
In
“What to Expect” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“Dr. Katie does a lot of research for her patients and takes
the time to create effective treatment plans.”
Like the use of
homeopathy.
The ND is an NUHS graduate, as she tells us she did her ND stuff in Illinois and a Linkedin page [saved 2015-08-07] tells us she graduated from NWHSU with a DC and NUHS with an ND.
ND
Darragh:
The ND is an NUHS graduate, as she tells us she did her ND stuff in Illinois and a Linkedin page [saved 2015-08-07] tells us she graduated from NWHSU with a DC and NUHS with an ND.
It also tells us she writes questions for the NPLEX.
On her practice bio. page [2014 archived], she tells us:
“Dr. Darragh was an instructor in
the Department of Clinical Sciences at National University of Health
Sciences in Illinois, teaching clinical nutrition, botanical
medicine, women's health and naturopathic clinical theory.”
She also
states there:
“Studio Within is the creative culmination of her
experiences and intention to incorporate a practice paradigm of
preventive and holistic healing oriented medicine which takes into
consideration all factors that influence health, wellness and
disease, the whole person interconnection (body, mind, spirit and
community) […] she emphasizes the therapeutic patient-practitioner
relationship and makes use of all appropriate therapies, both
conventional and alternative, with an emphasis on facilitating the
body's innate healing response and the use of natural, effective,
less-invasive interventions whenever possible. She wants to make sure
you get the care you need, whether it is from her or in combination
with other practitioners. She recognizes that good medicine must use
the broader concepts of health promotion, prevention of illness as
well as the treatment of disease, be inquiry driven and open to new
paradigms and possibilities.”
So, there's supernaturalism, yet
“natural […] effective therapies”, and medicine launched
apparently into the, shall I say, extra-mundane, as “new paradigms
and possibilities.”
Whatever that means.
In “What is Naturopathic Medicine?” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic medicine is a distinct primary health care
profession, emphasizing prevention, treatment, and optimal health
through the use of therapeutic methods and substances that encourage
an individuals' inherent self-healing process.”
So, there's distinct
and coded vitalism.
How ironic.
We're also told:
“the practice of
naturopathic medicine includes modern and traditional, scientific and
empirical methods.”
That's blending, essentially, though we were
told distinct.
Then we're told:
“naturopathic philosophy
[...includes] acknowledge, respect, and work with an individuals'
self-healing process the healing power of nature (vis medicatrix
naturae): naturopathic medicine recognizes an inherent self-healing
process in people that is ordered and intelligent. Naturopathic
doctors act to identify and remove obstacles to healing and recovery,
and to facilitate and augment this inherent self-healing process.”
And
that's all you get: coded vitalism.
Then, the ND writes:
“ND scope of
practice: depending upon the legislative jurisdiction the scope of
the naturopathic practice can differ. The most extensive scope of
practice includes the use of […] homeopathy[…] NDs that have
graduated from an accredited four-year residential naturopathic
medical school and have passed a set of extensive board examinations
can be registered as naturopathic doctors in the State of Minnesota
by the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice. This legislation is very
important, as it ensures preservation of the naturopathic profession
through a continuity of high academic standards and clinical
training, proficiency of medical knowledge, the maintenance of yearly
continuing education and most importantly provides for the safety of
the public. If you would like to learn more about naturopathic medicine, please visit the American Association of Naturopathic
Physicians website.“
So, homeopathy, a professions claim, a “high
academic standards” claim, a proficiency claim, a safety claim, and
referral to the AANP.
In
“FAQs” [2015 archived] she
states she is a:
“functional medicine specialist.”
And in “What is Functional Medicine?” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“functional medicine addresses the whole person, not just an
isolated set of symptoms […] functional medicine supports the
unique expression of health and vitality for each individual […]
many physicians are not adequately trained to assess the underlying
causes of complex, chronic disease […] the acute-care approach to
medicine lacks the proper methodology and tools for preventing and
treating complex, chronic disease [...and] functional medicine
involves understanding the origins, prevention and treatment of
complex, chronic disease […] an integrative, science-based
healthcare approach […] the unique [...] makeup of each patient is
considered, along with both internal (mind, body and spirit) and
external (physical and social environment) factors that affect
total functioning.”
So there is an accusation that 'conventional
medicine is negligent', and naturopathy knows better, and obviously, a
'science subset naturopathy subset functional medicine subset
supernaturalism claim'.
And in “Services” [2015 archived] she
speaks of “MTHFR genetic testing."
At sciencebasedmedicine.org,
Jann Bellamy writes in “Dubious MTHFR Genetic Mutation Testing”:
"on
the one hand, you could take the advice of [actual] geneticists with
advanced degrees who’ve spent their careers researching genetic
mutations and their effects on human health, plus several medical
organizations and other reputable research sources. They think
testing [such as MTHFR] is unnecessary and [instead] offer lower-cost
options where there is genuine concern. On the other hand, you could
listen to a naturopath with no particular background in anything, who
never published a single article in a reputable journal [on
genetics, yet] who has fashioned himself into a genetics expert,
who tells patients to get online testing then sells them dietary
supplements to treat their 'condition,' who promotes a number of
dubious organizations and products [...and] lectures with notorious
anti-vaccination cranks."
I can see why so many naturopaths are
doing this.
ND
Devgun:
The ND is a 1995 CCNM ND graduate.
The ND's link at MNANP takes us to the homepage of NWHSU.
At NWHSU, her bio. page
“Amrit Devgun” [2015 archived] states
she has:
“special interests” in practicing such things as “ayurveda
[…] iridology [...and] detoxification.”
And she speaks of:
“physically, emotionally, mentally and spiritually […] my goal is
to empower patients […] I’ve been working at the Natural Care Center at Woodwinds since 2001 [that's an NWHSU clinic...] prior to
this, I had a private practice in St. Paul.”
I have yet to find any
archived web pages from this ND's private practice from 2001 or
earlier, and I may talk more of that bio. page when I cover NWHSU.
And
must I remind:
that “S” in that school name abbreviation stands
for, supposedly, “science” and yet we have iridology of all
things there.
Now I've been saving web pages of naturopaths for two
decades, so historically speaking, I have had for some time, in the
Naturocrit database, the 1999 archived 1996 published article “A Comparison Between Allopathic and Naturopathic Medicine” which
is attributed to ND Devgun.
There she writes:
“in allopathic
(orthodox) medicine […] disease is identified as the result of a
imbalance in chemical and physical reactions. Such disruptions are
thought to be caused by the interference of a […] microbe […]
hence, if the signs, symptoms, and the said morbific agent can be
eradicated [...] then the disease can be controlled. This is the
philosophical foundation of orthodox medicine or mechanistic
medicine. Mechanistic medicine views the human body as a complex
machine made up of many parts […] this is where the vitalistic
perspective fits in. Vitalism views the whole as greater than the sum
of its parts. It takes into account the mental, emotional, spiritual,
genetic, environmental, and physical aspects of an individual in the
assessment of disease. The more information a practitioner can get
about these planes, the better the understanding of the disease
process, since disease is believed to be multifactorial in nature […]
in vitalism, the primary goal of treatment is not only to eradicate
the morbific agent, but to simultaneously stimulate, strengthen and
support the terrain or the defense mechanisms […] I am a vitalist.
I believe that involving yourself in self-responsibility for health
and well-being is the first step towards healing […] Dr. Amrit
Devgun is a naturopathic physician practicing at Present Moment on
Fridays.”
So there's vitalism admitted explicitly, supernaturalism
and kind, that misleading label of allopathic placed upon conventional medicine, and this straw-man
representation of conventional medicine.
The Present Moment practice page “The Philosophy of Present Moment”, as
archived in 2003, stated:
“what distinguishes natural medicine from
modern medicine (otherwise known as allopathic medicine) is that
natural medicine has the advantage of still possessing the spirit
which is the true healing agent. When drugs are manufactured by
pharmaceutical drug companies, the spirit (or the electrical charge)
vanishes from the substance resulting only in a cure on the physical
level and not at all on a spiritual level. For one to heal
completely, we need to heal on all levels because most health
problems are the result of the physical, emotional, mental and
spiritual imbalances of the patient […] we all hope to serve you as
best as we possibly can in maintaining and healing your body, mind
and spirit.”
So, obviously again, allopathic, and supernaturalism,
and the strange idea that spirit is also known as electrical
charge.
[The ND's other articles: 1999 article list].
This ND is a 1983 NCNM graduate and founding AANP member [here; 2015 archived].
ND
Healy:
This ND is a 1983 NCNM graduate and founding AANP member [here; 2015 archived].
In
“What is Naturopathic Medicine?” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic medicine blends centuries-old natural, non-toxic
therapies with current advances in the study of health and human
systems […] naturopathic physicians cooperate with all other
branches of medical science […] the principles of naturopathic
medicine: the healing power of nature: naturopathic medicine
recognizes an inherent self-healing process in the person which is
ordered and intelligent […] homeopathy is a powerful system of
medicine that is more than 200 years old. This medical system uses
highly diluted substances to cure illness. Homeopathic remedies act
to enhance the body's innate immune response and rarely have side
effects.”
So, there's blending, the huge categorical science claim,
coded vitalism, and homeopathy as a powerful therapy that cures.
On
her page “Services and Policies” we're
told:
“we welcome you as a patient and appreciate the opportunity to
provide you with our professional services […] Dr. Healy's areas of
focus are oncology, women's health, and general family practice
[…and] supervision of metabolic detoxification programs […] heavy
metal detoxification as it relates to neurological disorders,
weakened immune response and exposure to chemicals,and mercury dental
amalgams […] vaccination alternatives and information for those
choosing to not vaccinate […] Wellspring offers a full OTC
dispensary for natural health care including: nutritional
supplements, herbs, homeopathic and Bach flower remedies, medical
food, and detoxification products […] you do not have to be a
patient to purchase products. If you wish, we can mail your order to
you.”
In
“Approach to Care” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“Dr. Horek uses nutrition, botanical medicine, homeopathy and
mindfulness-based techniques to address chronic disease and health,
and holistic mental health [...] homeopathy is its own system of
diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic medical conditions that
works with the body’s natural healing ability, rather than fight
against it. With a focus on building health to eliminate symptoms,
the purpose of homeopathy is to restore the freedom of a flexible
response to a person’s environment – physically, mentally and
emotionally. Composed of over 200 years of empirical evidence
systematically organized for the best possible long-term outcome,
homeopathy is the personalized natural medicine approach that speaks
the body’s language of health and healing […] detoxification: from the individual cell to the human body as a whole there are very
specific physiological mechanisms for getting rid of toxins. When we
don’t support detoxification our organs and cells begin to
accumulate waste and their natural function diminishes. Using a
gradual approach and methods that speak the body’s language –
such as homeopathy, hydrotherapy and nutrition – Dr. Horek ensures
that the natural balance of ‘nutrients in, waste out’ gets
restored from every single cell to the whole person. This means a
more sustainable, balanced solution that supports your body’s
needs.”
So, homeopathy, coded vitalism, and detoxification.
In
“Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic medicine offers safe, effective natural
therapies as a vital part of your health care needs […]
naturopathic principles […] your body’s innate wisdom […]
naturopathic doctors are clinically trained experts in the field of
holistic health and natural medicine. Holistic health views the human
body as a whole system composed of mutually interdependent parts […]
naturopathic medicine uses a variety of modalities in order to
approach disease holistically.”
So, the claim of efficacy, coded
vitalism, holistic and natural.
In “Detox with Dr.Horek” [2015 archived] we're
told about:
“a 7-day science based detoxification program.”
In
“Chronic Lyme Disease and Terrain Medicine“ [2015 archived] we're
told:
“this is what drove Hahnemann [the founder of homeopathy] to
his science of homeopathy.”
And that is totally bass-ackwards in
terms of modern categories.
In “What is Naturopathic Medicine?” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“as long as we are still scientific in understanding what is
happening and why, of course.”
That's very rich.
In "The 'Good For You' Health Myth" [2015 archived], we're
told:
"a qualified healthcare professional [...] should (1)
refer for services (2) present a standard of care explanation (3) use
science and (4) communicate with other health care providers."
So
there is the claim of professionalism and science.
And standard of
care?
Naturopathy does not have to abide by the standard of care of
conventional medicine.
I don't know what standard of care here is
being talked about except for naturopathy's strange internal
standards like 'homeopathy is powerful and effective and
science-supported', which is a reversal of values:
an unstandard of
care, or a standard of uncare.
In "Microbiome and Global Dysbiosis" [2015 archived] we're
told:
"to do this, I use tools that I, and my colleagues, have
found the best long-term success with: UNDA numbered compounds,
gemmotherapy, gammadyn minerals, homeopathy, nutrition, western
botanicals, specific diet prescriptions […] and focused
nutrients."
Wikipedia tells us in
"Gemmotherapy":
"gemmotherapy, like many other
alternative therapies, lacks an evidential basis and is not accepted
as an efficacious treatment by the scientific community."
How
surprising.
ND Hughes is an NCNM graduate who practices with ND Aberle, also of NCNM, and ND Dotson of Bastyr University [here; 2015 archived].
NDs Hughes,
Aberle, and Dotson:
ND Hughes is an NCNM graduate who practices with ND Aberle, also of NCNM, and ND Dotson of Bastyr University [here; 2015 archived].
On
the homepage of the practice [2015 archived] we're
told:
“we do not treat disease directly, but rather strengthen the
body's vital force and stimulate true healing of the body.”
Really,
explicit vitalism.
What a relief, from a naturopathy observer:
it may
be a figmentation, but at least its transparently communicated.
And in
“Acupuncture” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“acupuncture is a complex branch of ancient Chinese medicine,
but its practical principal and methods are easily understood:
fourteen major energy channels called meridians course through the
human body [...] subtle energy called chi or qi […] circulates
via the meridians to all parts of the body, even the most remote
cells. Chi is the vital force, the presence of which separates the
living from the dead. Its balanced, unimpeded flow is critical to
sound health. Any misdirection, blockage, or other derangement of
the amount, flow, or balance of chi may result in pain, dysfunction,
and ill health. With acupuncture needles, or other means, the
acupuncturist stimulates certain points (acupoints) along the course
of the meridians. Such stimulation helps restore the normal balance
and flow of chi so organs and bodily systems can work together in
harmony as intended. This sets the state for the body to repair
itself and maintain its own health.”
Ah, CHI-nese medicine, which is integral to naturopathic education.
Now, you COULD be picky and
say:
why is chi EVERYWHERE in Chinese medieval metaphysics, when, if
it is VITAL FORCE, then it should only be in that which is
LIVING.
But, you'd be thinking.
You'd be thinking that rocks aren't
full of life force being that they are dead.
This is what I mean by
ontological conflation:
as if life properties are EVERYWHERE, even in
the hugely 'not with those properties'.
It's just 'big stupid':
like
how naturopathy can be 'a distinct system that blends' and 'the
science-based supernatural'.
In “Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic medicine is a system of medicine founded on an
honored medical principle: nature heals. The body has the inherent
ability to establish, maintain, and restore health. The naturopathic
practitioner's role is to facilitate and support this process.
Naturopathic practitioners can help the body's innate healing process
by identifying and removing obstacles to health and recovery through
treatment that enhances healing.”
That's coded vitalism, this
time.
We're also told:
“a well-informed client and skilled health
care practitioner form a partnership for effective health care,
health promotion, and disease prevention. The root meaning of the
word 'doctor' is teacher. You are likely to receive more information
about your condition and its treatments from a naturopathic
practitioner than you would in any other setting. When both the
practitioner and the client understand the disease process, they are
better able to work together and find a permanent solution.”
Your
ideas would have to be sound, of course, in order to be a GOOD
teacher:
anyone can teach nonsense.
Speaking of nonsense,
in “Homeopathy” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“homeopathy is a powerful system of medicine that is more than
200 years old. This medicinal system uses highly diluted natural
substances to relieve symptoms and treat illness. The active
ingredients in homeopathic medicines are diluted plants, animals, and
minerals that relieve the same symptoms they cause at full strength
[...] homeopathic remedies act to enhance the body's innate immune
response and rarely have side effects.”
Homeopathy as powerful and
active, and able to do 'anything' as in acting, is simply not true,
scientifically speaking.
In “Functional Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“functional medicine involves understanding the cause,
prevention, and treatment of complex, chronic diseases. It is an
integrative, science-based health care approach.”
Ah, a science-based
categorical label, again.
The ND is an NCNM graduate [here; 2015 archived]
ND
Hulsing:
The ND is an NCNM graduate [here; 2015 archived]
In
“Philosophy” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“partnering science with nature: integrative medicine combines
the best of conventional medical therapies and natural therapies
shown to be safe and effective by scientific evidence. It neither
rejects conventional medicine nor accepts natural therapies
uncritically. Integrative medicine is unique in that it bridges the
gap between conventional and natural medicine to benefit the
patient’s health […] guiding principles: the healing power of
nature: naturopathic doctors identify and remove obstacles to healing
and use therapies which facilitate the body’s innate healing
response.”
So, blending yet CATEGORICALLY science, a claim of
analysis and efficacy, and coded vitalism.
In “Education and Training” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“after completing pre-medical undergraduate studies,
naturopathic doctors train to be primary care providers at accredited
institutions where they complete a four year doctorate level medical
program.The doctorate of naturopathic medicine (ND) degree involves
the study of basic sciences (anatomy, physiology, pathology,
biochemistry, microbiology, pharmacology), clinical sciences
(cardiology, gynecology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, etc.) as
well as clinical physical diagnosis. While the basic course work is
similar to allopathic medical school, naturopathic doctors have
additional training in natural therapeutics with a strong emphasis on
preventative care. In Oregon, naturopathic doctors must pass a
rigorous professional board examination (NPLEX) to be licensed as
primary care doctors overseen by the North American Board of
Naturopathic Examiners. Please see the Association of Accredited
Naturopathic Medical College’s 'Professional Competency Profile'
for more information.”
So, doctoral level “medical”, science,
allopathic, rigor and the NPLEX, and a reference to AANMC's document
which claims professionalism.
That AANP-hosted AANMC 'Profile' [2015 archived], states:
"[an
ND must] effectively provide and manage patient care [...must]
compassionately, ethically and safely provide patients with
naturopathic medical care [...must] effectively utilize naturopathic
therapeutics, which include but are not limited to botanical
medicine, homeopathic medicine, physical medicine, clinical
nutrition, naturopathic counseling / health psychology, nature cure,
traditional healing arts and pharmacology as they relate to patient
care and case management."
So there's the posture that homeopathy
is effective, and ethics.
In the document, vitalism is coded and
homeopathy is a form of deception.
How ETHICAL is that?
Naturopathy's
unethical is ethical, ineffective is effective:
reversed values
continue.
In
“Services” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“homeopathic medicine: homeopathy was introduced by a German
physician Dr. Samuel Hahnemann over 200 years ago. The system views
the body as a synthesis rather than individual organ systems.
Homeopathic remedies, which consist of very dilute plant and mineral
substances, are chosen based on a combination of an individual’s
physical, mental, and emotional symptoms. When a correct remedy is
taken the body is stimulated to heal itself and return to balance.
Homeopathy defines health as not merely the absence of disease, but
as our ability to reach the highest goal of our existence. It is
especially effective for use in children and individuals who cannot
tolerate other types of therapy as it is gentle and free of side
effects.”
So, homeopathy claimed as effective again.
On her bio. page [2015 archived], we're told:
So, homeopathy claimed as effective again.
On her bio. page [2015 archived], we're told:
“she holds a certificate in homeopathic medicine from the New England School of Homeopathy [...and she mentions] highly effective
[…] rigorously trained, qualified and committed to excellence.”
How
is treating people with homeopathy excellent?
The ND is a graduate of NCNM [here; 2015 archived].
ND
Litchy:
The ND is a graduate of NCNM [here; 2015 archived].
A
bio. states:
“Dr. Litchy […] strives to incorporate and utilize
modern medical science with effective natural treatments while never
forgetting the individuality of his patients.”
So, a kind of
blending, and an overarching claim of efficacy.
The practice's homepage [2015 archived] states:
“at Neighborhood Naturopathic,
we strive to identify and resolve disturbances to your health by
supporting your body’s inherent capacity to maintain optimal
function. By combining the latest research and evidence base with
time-tested natural approaches to healing, we offer solutions to your
health concerns. Together, we will address your health and
individuality. The goal of the naturopathic approach is a complete
resolution of illness, feeling wonderful, and cultivating personal
empowerment and satisfaction in your life. This is possible!”
So,
blending again, coded vitalism, research and evidence base, and
promises promises.
And appealing to people's vanity of
individuality.
In “About Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic physicians are trained in four-year nationally
accredited institutions and must pass national board exams to be
eligible for licensure. NDs share a comprehensive physician level
education in modern physiology, biochemistry, and pathology with
their doctorate educated peers, but also complete extensive training
integrating this modern scientific knowledge with the age-old wisdom
of natural healing techniques […] they offer diet and lifestyle
counseling; prescribe botanicals, homeopathics, and supplements;
perform in-office procedures like bodywork; and teach lifestyle
techniques such as meditation, qigong, and healthy routines […]
naturopathic medicine is based on a philosophy of medical care
emphasizing the individuality and innate healing capacity of the
person […] naturopathic philosophy: the naturopathic philosophy of
practice is succinctly stated in the six principles of naturopathic
medicine […] the healing power of nature (vis medicatrix
naturae): the body has an inherent capacity to maintain health,
treatments guide and support this capacity.”
So, NPLEX,
comprehensive, blending, science, doctoral-level, homeopathy, qi, and
coded vitalism.
And in “Modalities” [2015 archived] we're told:
“the healing process
occurs in you. Below is a list of modalities I find effective […]
homeopathy: homeopathic preparations are diluted and potentized FDA
approved medicines. Homeopathic remedies are non-toxic, and free from
side effects. They must be carefully chosen to be fully effective,
but the correct remedy can result in great positive changes. These
medicines are inexpensive, effective, and can be used simultaneously
with pharmaceuticals, botanicals, and other treatments.”
Her homepage [2014 archived] states:
“bridging the ancient wisdom
of nature with modern science.”
That is blending.
In
“Philosophy” [2015 archived] we're told:
“naturopaths integrate
the wisdom of nature with modern medical science […] principles of
naturopathic care: the following six principles are the founding
tenets that define and guide the practice of naturopathic medicine
[…] use the healing power of nature […] Chinese medicine […]
this system is based on the idea that pathways of energy, or 'qi',
run in regular patterns through the body. These channels, called
meridians, flow like rivers to irrigate and nourish the body’s
tissues, blood and organs. An obstruction in the movement of these
energy rivers is like a dam that backs up, creating imbalances and
pain. Energy can also become depleted as a result of stress,
overwork, or chronic illness and this may cause the energetic stream
to dry up and eventually stop flowing.”
So, there's integrating or
blending, coded vitalism and then qi, and the medieval model of
irrigation, apparently, and the misappropriation of the scientific
term energy as a synonym for qi:
that figmentation.
In
“Modalities” [2015 archived] we're told:
“homeopathy is a very
gentle and effective way of treating the whole person physically,
mentally, and emotionally […] this very individualized treatment is
very safe and effective for children, and adults […] biotherapeutic
drainage is a deep acting therapy that has been used in Europe for
over the past 100 years. The plant and mineral based remedies, along
with lifestyle modifications, assist the body’s individual systems
to eliminate toxins that interfere with the body’s normal
physiology, thus leading to chronic disease. This in combination with
other therapies provides a deeply effective way of getting to the
root cause of disease to then repair and restore that physiology back
into balance.”
So, again homeopathy claimed as effective, and the
Toxin Bogeyman.
And
in “FAQ” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic doctors are licensed primary care providers in
the state of Minnesota; trained with an emphasis on holistic
assessment and treatment that focuses on the vitality and well being
of the whole person. Our goal is to stimulate the body’s power to
heal itself […] naturopaths are comprehensively trained in holistic
assessment and treatment modalities including […] homeopathy.”
So,
there's holistic, coded vitalism, and homeopathy.
This ND is an NCNM graduate, according to her. bio.page [2015 archived].
ND
Oppitz:
This ND is an NCNM graduate, according to her. bio.page [2015 archived].
In
“What Is Naturopathy?” [2015 archived; also here] we're told:
“a licensable naturopath
has attended an accredited four-year post-graduate naturopathic
medical school. The curriculum includes two years of basic sciences
and two years of clinical sciences; similar to an M.D. (or
allopath).”
Ah, a science claim and that weird sectarian label
naturopathy uses upon conventional medicine:
allopathic.
allopathic.
In
“Naturopathic Medicine: What it Is, What it Can Do for You” [2015 archived] we're told:
“naturopaths cooperate
with all other branches of medical science […] the naturopathic
profession is committed to on-going scientific research and
development. Today’s practitioners add to the growing body of
research by incorporating modern scientific methods that expand the
understanding of the mechanisms of natural healing and therapeutics.
Ongoing research immunology, diagnosis, clinical nutrition, botanical
medicine, psychology, and other clinical sciences contribute to the
development of naturopathic medicine […] scientific research has
shown that many medical conditions can be treated as effectively with
food and nutritional supplements […] a resurgence of scientific
research in Europe and Asia […] NDs are trained in medical
sciences.”
So, there's the grossest of science categorical claims, and a
claim of profession.
And we're told there too:
“the principles of
naturopathy: the healing power of nature: naturopathic medicine
recognizes an inherent self-healing process in the person which is
ordered and intelligent. Naturopaths act to identify and remove
obstacles to healing and recovery, and to facilitate and augment this
inherent self-healing process […] homeopathy is a powerful system
of medicine that is more than 200 years old. This medical system uses
highly diluted substances to cure illness. Homeopathic remedies act
to enhance the body’s innate immune response and rarely have side
effects.”
Ah, coded vitalism and homeopathy as powerful.
There's the
ND's article “How Do Homeopathy and Naturopathy Compare?” [2015 archived; also
here] wherein
we're told:
“homeopathy […] a medicine that is completely
non-toxic, has no side effects, is individualized for you, and is an
effective treatment for mental, emotional, and physical
ailments.”
So there, a claim of homeopathy's efficacy.
Now, the ND's homepage [2015 archived] states:
“naturopathic
medicine emphasizes and utilizes the body's inherent ability to
protect and repair itself. At Itasca Naturopathic Clinic, we help you
support these mechanisms […] naturopathy is not 'alternative'
medicine, but truly integrative medicine providing a comprehensive
approach to the best of traditional and conventional medicine. NDs
welcome and encourage people to become educated and involved in their
healthcare decisions because knowledgeable patients are more
successful in attaining their health goals.“
So, there's coded
vitalism as a supposed “mechanism”, integrating, a claim of best,
a claim of educating and knowledge.
With homeopathy falsely claimed as
science, do you now feel empowered and knowledgeable?
It is truly
amazing how averse NCNM graduates toward using the actual language
NCNM uses to describe naturopathy.
ND Orchard and ND Montgomery are NCNM graduates, and ND Vilensky a Bastyr graduate.
NDs Orchard,
Montgomery and Vilensky:
ND Orchard and ND Montgomery are NCNM graduates, and ND Vilensky a Bastyr graduate.
The three are listed
practitioners at “Be Well Natural Medicine” [2015 archived].
Their homepage states [2015 archived]:
“naturopathic medical care [...]
combines the most cutting-edge medical science with time-tested
natural therapies.”
So, there's blending.
The page “Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] states:
“ND’s
are required to complete training in natural and holistic therapies
such as [...] homeopathy […] after passing national board exams,
they are licensed to perform natural primary care medicine […]
homeopathy is a powerful energetic form of medicine that matches the
vibrational patterns of an individual with the most resonant
homeopathic remedy […] biotherapeutic drainage: A form of
homeopathy, biotherapeutic drainage is a gentle yet very deep healing
modality. Different than a cleanse or detoxification protocol,
biotherapeutic drainage works much deeper, on both a cellular and
energetic level to enhance the natural routes of elimination so
proper functioning of cells, organs, and body systems can be restored
[…] naturopathic principles: naturopathic doctors use these 6
principles of naturopathic medicine as their guides [...including]
the body has an inherent wisdom to heal.”
So, there's holistic,
homeopathy, natural, NPLEX, and coded vitalism.
The ND's bio. tells us [2015 archived; also here] she's an NUHS graduate:
that's a science subset naturopathy claim of the grossest, most categorical kind.
ND Pharis:
The ND's bio. tells us [2015 archived; also here] she's an NUHS graduate:
that's a science subset naturopathy claim of the grossest, most categorical kind.
NUHS stands for National University of Health Sciences, with an
ND program within that label.
In “About Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic doctors work in conjunction with all other
branches of medical science […] above all, naturopathic medicine
honors the body’s innate wisdom to heal […] naturopathic medical
students receive training in the same basic sciences as conventional
medical students with additional coursework in holistic and nontoxic
approaches to therapy.”
Ah, that categorical science claim, coded
vitalism, and holistic.
And displayed are homeopathic remedies, though
science was promised categorically.
In “Principles of Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic medicine recognizes an inherent self-healing
process in each person. Naturopathic doctors work to support this by
recognizing and removing obstacles to healing and recovery, and to
facilitate and augment this inherent self-healing process […]
naturopathic doctors are trained in a variety of therapeutic
modalities including […] homeopathy.”
So, there's coded vitalism and
homeopathy, and there's a page at the practice that lists the diseases
naturopathy can improve which also has a picture of homeopathic
lactose
pellets.
ND
Quamina:
We're told in “Springtime…Allergy Time! By Ayanna Quamina, Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine“ [2015 archived]:
“Ayanna Quamina received her
naturopathic medical degree from Southwest College of Naturopathic
Medicine in Tempe, Arizona and [her] bachelor’s of science in
psychology. She strongly believes in the the body’s innate ability
to heal, and utilizes methods via botanicals, nutrition,
hydrotherapy, and homeopathy to help guide it.“
So, SCNM, coded
vitalism, homeopathy, science.
In “Services List” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“holistic services […] naturopathic medicine is a holistic
approach to health care that blends the medical training of primary
care with time-honored natural therapies. All acute and chronic
conditions result from the natural interplay between multiple body
systems. A naturopathic approach looks to integrate these systems
into a cohesive whole […] naturopathic medicine satisfies your
health care needs for a holistic and empowering medical approach.”
So,
holistic, natural, blending, integrating, and empowering.
Also on this
page we're told:
“acupuncture […] chiropractic […] ear candling
[…] homeopathic care […] homeopathic remedies are recommended
which stimulate your body’s own immune system […] a few of the
many things homeopathy can help with include pain relief, depression,
chronic disease, skin issues, anxiety, insomnia, headaches and
constipation […] homeoprophylaxis […] HP offers a gentle, natural
alternative to vaccination. The goal of homeoprophylaxis (the use of
homeopathic nosodes for disease prevention) is to introduce into the
human system the energetic components (nosodes) of particular
diseases in order to stimulate the immune system to produce immunity
[…] antibody titers draws are not a required aspect of this program
[because nosodes don't work, by the way…] all participants
undertaking the program will be a part of a long term study on the
efficacy of homeoprophylaxis […] program includes […] remedy kit
with sufficient remedy doses for 44 months of homeoprophylaxis […]
reiki uses light touch or hand movements on or above the client’s
body to clear, energize and balance the human energy system. Restores
harmony and balance to the client’s energy system placing them in a
position to self-heal. Energy work treats the whole person including
body, emotions, mind and spirit creating many beneficial effects that
include relaxation and feelings of peace, security and well-being.
Many have reported miraculous relief from physical, emotional and
spiritual symptoms. Performed through clothing.”
So, there's weird
stuff, coded vitalism, FAKE immunization with fake remedies, and
laying on of hands.
As of 2015-02, the ND was on the providers list of the practice sparkwellness.net.
ND Svobodny practices with NDs Todd and Molly Ferguson at prairiend.com.
ND Svobodny
and NDs Ferguson:
ND Svobodny practices with NDs Todd and Molly Ferguson at prairiend.com.
Their
homepage [2015 archived] tells us:
“naturopathic medicine is a
distinct profession of primary health care, emphasizing prevention,
treatment and the promotion of optimal health through the use of
therapeutic methods and modalities which encourage the self-healing
process. In other words, it is a system of medicine that stimulates
the body's innate ability to heal itself with the use of natural
therapeutics […] our doctors work to identify and remove your
obstacles to cure while supporting your innate process of
healing.“
There's the claim of being distinct and yet CODED
vitalism, how ironic and opaque.
Their page “About Us and Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] tells us they are all Bastyr
graduates and:
“board
certified naturopathic doctors attend four years of post-graduate
medical training at an accredited naturopathic medical school where
they are trained as primary care physicians integrating traditional
healing methods with modern scientific medicine.”
So there is
knowledge blending.
They state:
“naturopaths receive training
[...which includes] homeopathy […and] the naturopathic doctor must
pass a set of science boards taken after the second year and a set of
clinical board exams taken after the fourth year.”
So there's
homeopathy and NPLEX.
And they tell us:
“naturopathic medicine has
six basic principles that serve as a foundation for all naturopathic
care [...#1] the healing power of nature (vis medicatrix nature): we
recognize your inherent healing ability. We identify and help you
remove obstacles to recovery and support your healing ability.”
That's
coded vitalism, again.
How NOT distinct.
In
“Treatments” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“NanoSRT (Stress Reduction Therapy) optimizes your response to
stressors […] utilizing FDA-cleared galvanic skin response testing
and laser stimulation of acupuncture points.”
There's a Youtube video by the maker,
apparently, which seems to
state:
the “biofeedback device” that “emits frequencies” for a
“100 point inspection” that is used to measure the “stress”
of these substances on the body based on “bioelectric medicine
principles” which are “scientifically proven” to measure the
unique “energetic frequency” of all substances and then the
machine transmits by “LED light” frequencies to “various
meridian points on the body."
Huh?
The maker's web page “FAQ” [2015 archived] states:
“what
is stress reduction therapy? […] SRT is a remarkable new procedure
that combines the disciplines of acupuncture, biofeedback and
homeopathy with laser light technology. A computerized scan or test
is done to see what your body is sensitive to, and how it is out of
balance, then help it learn not to be [...] substance specific frequencies converted to a digital format, and
presented in the form of sound and light, are what allow for patient
assessment and therapy down to the molecular level. The frequencies
are what make it possible to assess thousands of substance
sensitivities in mere minutes, then allow the brain and nervous
system to record a new association that is positive or neutral
instead of the inappropriate ones that were previously stored in
memory. This breaks the link between the stimulus and response, makes
symptoms unnecessary, creates balance and harmony, from dis-ease and
disharmony, and allows the body to function better […] because the
Nano SRT / BioScan is a non-invasive and painless therapy it falls
under the scope of practice for many types of physicians, including
but not limited to medical doctors (MD), doctors of chiropractic
(DC), doctors of osteopathy (DO), homeopathic doctors, naturopathic
doctors and acupuncturists.”
How woo-ful.
Also on their page
“Testing” [2015 archived] they tell us they do:
“digital cardio
analysis (DCA) [which] utilizes heart sounds to detect nutrient
deficiencies and organ dysfunction [...and] bioimpedance analysis
(BIA) [which] tests body composition […] toxicity and cellular
health […and] heart rate variability (HRV) [which] analyzes the
flexibility and adaptability of the autonomic nervous system and the
circulatory system.”
Really: more reading of tea leaves for
diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, essentially.
In
“Begin Your Journey To Wellness Today!“ [2015 archived] we're told:
“naturopathic medicine
encourages the body's innate self-healing process by blending
centuries-old knowledge of natural therapies with current scientific
advances in healthcare […] naturopathic students must master all
the basic and clinical sciences required to graduate from a
conventional medical school.”
So, therein is coded vitalism, blended
knowledge, and YET a claimed science MASTERY.
At another ND Torres practice page [2015 archived] we're
told:
“Dr. Torres has an in-depth understanding of and training in
both conventional and holistic approaches to healthcare. She is
well-versed in natural supplements and prescription pharmaceuticals,
as well as potential herb / drug interactions [...] what is the
difference between homeopathic medicine and naturopathic medicine?
Both homeopathy and naturopathy are [...] effective and gentle
healing modalities that treat almost every medical condition […]
homeopathy uses solely homeopathic remedies, while naturopathy uses a
variety of medicines, including homeopathy.”
So, holistic, natural,
and a claim homeopathy is effective.
Not.
As if:
the ND understands
pharmacology and science.
There's a strong categorical science claim by this 1998 Bastyr ND graduate on two pages.
ND
Vilensky:
There's a strong categorical science claim by this 1998 Bastyr ND graduate on two pages.
First there's “Resources” [2015 archived] where we're told:
“accredited
naturopathic medicine schools [...include] National University of
Health Sciences.”
Then there's “Naturopathic Medicine Vis Medicatrix Naturae: The Healing Power of Nature” [2015 archived] where we're told:
“naturopathic physicians cooperate with all other
branches of medical science [...naturopathy has] a commitment to
state-of-the-art scientific research […NDs study] the same basic
sciences as a medical doctor.”
We're also told there:
“the
principles of naturopathic medicine [include]: the healing power of
nature: naturopathic medicine recognizes an inherent self-healing
process in the person which is ordered and intelligent. naturopathic
physicians act to identify and remove obstacles to healing and
recovery, and to facilitate and augment this self-healing process […]
the education of a naturopathic physician includes [...] homeopathy
[…] naturopathic medicine encourages the self-healing process, the
vis medicatrix naturae, and blends centuries-old knowledge of natural
therapies with current advances in the understanding of health and
human systems […] naturopathic medicine is a unique
profession.”
That's coded vitalism, homeopathy, blending, and a
professional claim.
In “Services and Therapies” [2015 archived] we're told:
“therapies used
[...include] homeopathy [and] cleansing / detoxification.”
On the homepage [2015 archived] of the ND's practice, we're
told:
“the Minnesota Valley Naturopathic Clinic is a holistic
medical practice […] whole-person wellness […] I'm a licensed
doctor of naturopathic medicine […] integrating complementary,
alternative, and conventional therapies […] my goal is to provide
the highest quality patient-centered care […] by counterbalancing
the often-negative effects of conventional approaches.”
So, that's
holistic, integrating, highest quality, and a swipe at conventional
medicine.
Now, what's most fascinating is the ND's page “Informed Consent for All New Patients” [vsc 2015-08-07] which states:
“Dr. Vilensky, to the best of her ability, will
present treatment facts and options accurately, and will make
recommendations according to standards of good naturopathic medical
practice.”
Now, if those standards are:
LOW and CRAZY, which they are
and as a standard GOOD, then that assurance is an assurance of CRAZY
and LOW, and BAD.
We're told:
“the scope of practice of a registered
naturopathic doctor in the State of Minnesota includes, but is not
limited to, the following services [..including] homeopathic
medicines […] Dr. Vilensky passed all NPLEX examinations and
received her Washington license in 1999 to practice as a naturopathic
doctor. She maintains this license as well.”
Like I said, LOW and
CRAZY standards, because it is NPLEX that labels homeopathy a
“clinical science.”
According to the NWHSU 2011 catalog [2015 archived; here's the 2008 catalog with her in it, too], the ND is a 2005 UBCNM ND graduate who works or worked for NWHSU as an assistant professor.
ND
Waldron-Trapp:
According to the NWHSU 2011 catalog [2015 archived; here's the 2008 catalog with her in it, too], the ND is a 2005 UBCNM ND graduate who works or worked for NWHSU as an assistant professor.
She lists, this 2015-07, on the directory of
the the school [2015 archived] with
an @nwhealth.edu email address and her department being “Bloomington
Natural Care Center.”
Her own practice bio. page [2015 archived] at
naturalfamilydoc.com states:
“I
focus my efforts on treating the foundational causes of health
conditions. This allows me to provide support for your body’s
innate ability to heal itself through [...] holistic
combination [...which includes] homeopathy […part of her] safe and
effective natural therapies for the whole family [...by way of]
genetic testing, detoxification programs and education […]
conventional medicine throws drug after drug at symptoms, not causes
[…] I learned how effective naturopathic medicine is, thanks in
most part to its holistic approach and numerous options.”
So there's
holistic, coded vitalism, detoxification, homeopathy, in a
dog-whistle sense 'supposedly able to do what conventional doctors
supposedly don't, treat the foundation or cause'.
That's quite a claim
from someone who, quite falsely, thinks homeopathy is efficacious as
part of naturopathy's “safe and effective natural therapies.”
The
'better-than-MDs dog whistle' continues on the page “What is Naturopathic Medicine?” [2015 archived] which states:
“naturopathic medicine’s
philosophy embraces the idea that the body has an inherent ability to
heal itself when given the right tools for optimal health [coded
vitalism...] naturopathic doctors [...work by] identifying and
treating the cause of health conditions, instead of merely treating
the symptoms […] it gets to the root of the problem: naturopathic
doctors utilize functional medicine labs to identify the foundational
cause(s) of health conditions […] naturopathic doctors like me are
trained in a variety of treatment methods to meet the individual
needs of their patients. These treatment options include [...]
homeopathy.”
So there's coding of the essentially naturopathic as
usual -- its vitalism -- and the not so subtle not so dog whistle of
'not negligent like MDs', functional medicine, and homeopathy.
In “Natural Treatment Options” [2015 archived], ND
Waldron-Trapp tells
us:
“homeopathic remedies: homeopathy […] this form of medicine
uses extremely small doses of substances. It is an energetic medicine
designed to restore balance within our bodies.”
As if.
Now, ND
Waldron-Trapp is a BIG, and I mean BIG proponent of replacing
vaccines with homeopathy.
We're told in “My Naturopathic Medicine Services” [2015 archive] that
the ND offers:
“vaccination information: this includes a
consultation to acquire information on individual vaccinations. The
goal of this consultation is to educate you about the pros and cons
of vaccinations so you can make an educated decision for yourself
and/or your children. In Minnesota you have a right to refuse
vaccinations for philosophical, medical or religious reasons. If you
refuse vaccinations, however, it is important to be educated about
the different diseases. You may also be interested in
homeoprophylaxis […] homeoprophylaxis (HP): I am an HP supervisor.
I offer tailored consultations to begin an individualized
homeoprophylaxis program for yourself and/or your children.
Homeoprophylaxis is a program in which homeopathic nosodes are given
to induce an appropriate immune response. This provokes immunity to a
particular disease. It can be used to educate / prepare the immune
system on how to respond to a particular disease before exposure,
during exposure or after exposure. Visit the free and healthy
children website to learn more about homeoprophylaxis, the schedule /
status sheet, and fees. Appointment times range from 30-60 minutes;
fees are based on actual time taken.“
And that's CRAZY.
And on the
page “Great Reads for Improved Health and Wellness” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“here is a list of great books for you to read to improve your
understanding of naturopathy, healthy eating and healthy living
[...including]
Everybody’s Guide to Homeopathic Medicines, by Dana
Ullman [here it is at amazon.com, which is a] step-by-step guide on picking the right homeopathic remedy
for you and your ailment. Contains information on many remedies for
common ailments and when medical care is necessary […and also recommended]
The
Complete Homeopathy Handbook: Safe and Effective Ways to Treat
Fevers, Coughs, Colds and Sore Throats, Childhood Ailments, Food
Poisoning, Flu, and a Wide Range of Everyday Complaints, by Miranda
Castro [here it is at amazon.com]. A complete a-z listing of common internal and external
remedies and tips on how to correctly assess your symptoms. Includes
dos and don’ts for treating more than 70 conditions […and also recommended]
Homeopathic
Alternatives to Immunization: A Guide For Travelers And Parents
Looking For An Alternative To Being Immunized, by Susan Curtis [here it is at amazon.com].
Gives tips to parents on which homeopathic remedies are good for
prevention and treatment of certain diseases that hold a higher risk
for communicability when traveling […and also recommended]
Vaccine
Free: Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Contagious Disease with
Homeopathy, by Kate Birch [here it is at amazon.com]. The philosophy and practical applications
of homeopathy described in this book offer an alternative or
conjunctive path to the use of vaccination for the treatment and
prevention of infectious contagious diseases […and also recommended]
There
Is a Choice: Homeoprophylaxis, by Cilla Whatcott and Dr. Isaac
Golden [here it is at amazon.com]. A personal account of current research on vaccine safety, how
the immune system is meant to function, the history and application
of homeoprophylaxis, and advice about how to make critical decisions
regarding your children's health […also recommended]
The
Solution: Homeoprophylaxis: The Vaccine Alternative Paperback, by
Kate Birch and Cilla Whatcott [here it is at amazon.com]. A parent’s guide to educating your
child’s immune system using specific homeopathic remedies […and finally on the list, recommended]
HP
Program, by Kate Birch and Cilla Whatcott [here it is at amazon.com]. A step-by-step guide to
the homeoprophylaxis program.”
I will
provide Amazon.com links to all those books.
In “The Philosophy Behind Naturopathic Medicine“ [2015 archived] she tells us:
“the body has an
inherent ability to heal itself [coded vitalism] when given the right
tools for optimal health. There are fundamental principles that
naturopathic doctors use to bring about these healing properties
within the body. These include the following: the healing power of
nature: when sickness prevails, it is due to an imbalance within the
body. Treatment includes restoring this natural balance so the body
can heal itself once again.”
Again, HUGELY coded vitalism.
In
“Understanding Naturopathic Medicinal Practice in Minnesota” [2015 archived] the
ND states:
“an individual can practice medicine without a license in
Minnesota.”
Really?
Have they lost their minds there?
She goes on:
“the
advantage is that it allows naturopathic doctors to practice under a
registration number, like myself. It also allows other qualified
health care providers, such as homeopathic doctors and massage
therapists to practice in this state. The disadvantage is that an
individual can call himself or herself a naturopath without ever
having obtained the appropriate education […] my recommendation to
anyone seeking naturopathic medical advice is that you should always
consider your potential naturopath’s education and background […I
have] formal training […] this formal training involves a four-year
education in a program accredited for naturopathic medicine […]
please ensure you [...] compare the education and experience of each
doctor you are considering. Look for someone who is registered with
the state of Minnesota as a naturopathic doctor, like myself.”
Quite
advantageous, but I'd argue that “appropriate” is not the right
adjective to describe an ND education:
I'd lump it all together as miseducation.
I'd lump it all together as miseducation.
And coincidentally she obtained her ND from the same
ND-granting school I attended, UBCNM.
It was nonsense, formalized.
She
tells us her school's:
“courses include[d...] homeopathic medicine
[…the] training culminates in national board exams that enable
those who pass to practice as a primary care physician […] in
Minnesota, those that have passed these national board exams are
registered with the state and practice under Statute 147E for
naturopathic doctors.”
Now, UB, at her school, tells us naturopathy is
within a “division of health sciences” and therein science subset
naturopathy subset homeopathy.
Which is bullshit.
And the national
exam, the NPLEX, falsely labels homeopathy, as I often say, “clinical
science.”
How reassured are you now, as a potential patient,
knowing about formalized nonsense and formalized falsehood?
On July 31, 2015, by the way, cbc.ca published the article "Nosode Homeopathic Labels Must Read 'Not Vaccines or Alternatives to Vaccines:' Health Canada".
The article states:
Regarding Homeoprophylaxis in
Canada:
On July 31, 2015, by the way, cbc.ca published the article "Nosode Homeopathic Labels Must Read 'Not Vaccines or Alternatives to Vaccines:' Health Canada".
The article states:
"homeopathic
products promoted to parents will need to be clear they are not
vaccines or alternatives to vaccines, Health Canada says. The
department announced Friday it is introducing label changes for
certain homeopathic products. Nosodes are ultradiluted forms of
diseased tissue, pus, blood, or excretions from a sick person or
animal that some homeopaths and naturopaths sell, often in a pellet
form. The new statement for nosode products is required to be: 'this
product is neither a vaccine nor an alternative to vaccination. This
product has not been proven to prevent infection. Health Canada does
not recommend its use in children and advises that your child receive
all routine vaccinations.' Health Canada said it will also no longer
allow companies to make specific health claims on homeopathic
products for cough, cold, and flu for children 12 and under, unless
those claims are supported by scientific evidence [...] a separate
investigation by Marketplace revealed how little scientific evidence
is required by Health Canada to license homeopathic remedies.
Marketplace created a children's fever and pain remedy called
Nighton, which claimed to provide 'effective relief from fever, pain,
and inflammation' for children and infants. Health Canada granted a
license to sell the product, despite no scientific proof that the
product works."
On August 4th, 2015, the National Post in Canada published "Labeling on Homeopathic Products Must Make Clear That They Are Not Vaccines: Health Canada", which stated:
On August 4th, 2015, the National Post in Canada published "Labeling on Homeopathic Products Must Make Clear That They Are Not Vaccines: Health Canada", which stated:
"responding to widespread concern in the medical world, Health Canada has ordered new labeling that makes clear homeopathic 'nosodes' are not vaccines, contrary to how they’re often marketed [...] nosodes are a type of homeopathic solutions promoted by natural-health
practitioners and anti-vaccine advocates as an alternative to vaccines [...] Health Canada also says that it will no longer approve claims that homeopathic remedies can treat cold and flu in children unless there is scientific evidence to support the assertions [...] over the last decade or so, the regulator has certified 8,500 homeopathic products of all sorts, while admitting they 'are not supported by scientific evidence' [...] 'it’s a joke, is what it is,' said Prof. Joe Schwarcz, head of McGill University’s Office for Science and Society. 'Homeopathy has no legitimacy. It’s a scientifically bankrupt idea and it should not be promoted in any way.'"
Agreed.
Naturopathy and its homeopathy: quite on the
wrong side as usual.
Two Non-AANP-CAND
Naturopaths:
Now, apparently, ANYONE in Minnesota –
with a little bit of credential or a lot, as in degrees or
certificates from mail-order / distance to in-residence – can
practice as a doctor of naturopathy, which means practicing medicine
legally.
If even medicine that's false and fake!
Aka things like homeopathy therapy, and
weirdo diagnostics.
The AANP-type NDs would have us believe
they are science-based and therein what's within that broad label as
activity and belief are of such RIGOROUS filtering.
The AANP-CAND types -- and I'll
include Canada because there's quite a reciprocity in North America
among the AANMC schools -- would have us believe that their position
is not absurd, but academically top-tier.
My answer to that is bullshit.
And one reason is because non-AANP-CAND
naturopaths, who may not be allowed to say 'naturopathic physician'
in Minnesota but who can say 'naturopathic doctor' and apparently ND,
QUITE COMICALLY, are doing so much of the same stuff as those AANP
'clowns in tuxedos.'
And so I include two examples here, to
show how similar naturopaths ALL are, what all naturopaths have in common:
bogus therapeutics and diagnostics, and
weirdo beliefs when you tease out what's essentially naturopathic from what is generally decent health knowledge.
Naturopathic
Doctor Boraas:
Now, this 'ND' does NOT on his web pages use those
initials, and he spells for shit.
I've made corrections in my
transcript for the sake of my own sanity.
In “A Student of Nature” [vsc 2015-08-08]
– a page whose banner is “Center for Natural Healing, Minneapolis's Naturopathic Doctor” – we're
told:
“in
1977, Dr. Boraas founded the Center for Natural Healing in the Twin
Cities […] he was certified with the American Naturopathic Medical
Certification and Accreditation Board in Washington, DC in
1999.”
We're also told there:
“homeopathy […is] treatment of
disease by very small, energetic doses of natural substance that in a
healthy person would produce symptoms of disease […] Dr. Boraas
practices both classical and clinical homeopathy at the Center For
Natural Healing […] iridology: examining the iris to determine
information about a patient's systematic health […] the science and
application of iridology [...] Dr. Boraas continued his studies with
the National Iridology Research Association under Harry Wolfe and
Bill Carodonna ND […] sclerology: interpretation of the red lines
in the whites of the eyes for health evaluation […] reflexology: a
system of points on feet, hands and body linked to every organ. When
stimulated, they help relive tension and treat illness […]
acupressure and energy balance: using a combination of deep shiatsu
pressure with lighter touch to restore body's energy balance.”
So there was homeopathy, the misuse of this term energetic, iridology and a claim of science upon iridology, sclerology, reflexology and acupressure.
So there was homeopathy, the misuse of this term energetic, iridology and a claim of science upon iridology, sclerology, reflexology and acupressure.
The homepage [vsc 2015-08-08] states:
”Center for
Natural Healing founded by naturopathic doctor Bruce Boraas in 1977
[…] the longest established naturopathic doctor practice in
Minneapolis. Patients with a variety of health conditions come for
treatments and restore their bodies to health. Dr. Boraas focuses on
gentle natural treatments, including herbs and food programs,
homeopathic remedies and acupressure / reflexology energy work to
activate your body's healing ability. In addition to the traditional
naturopathic methodologies, Dr. Boraas is the only practitioner in MN
who is trained in iridology and sclerology, the methods of evaluating
health patterns by looking closely at your iris and sclera.”
So there also was coded vitalism.
In “Top Ten Reasons Patients See Dr. Boraas” [vsc 2015-08-08] we're
told:
“Dr. Boraas brings over 25 years of experience in practicing
loving natural healing to every patient he sees. There are natural or
naturopathic alternatives available for most health problems. Given
the proper natural care and lifestyle changes, the body restores to
balance and health […] natural holistic care and healing: natural
diagnostics, nutritional analysis, iridology, pulse and tongue
diagnosis, healing herbs, homeopathic remedies, whole food nutrition,
acupressure and reflexology energy healing [...conditions treated
include] PMS, irregular or painful periods [...] menopause, symptoms
of fatigue, loss of interest, hot flashes […] gas, indigestion,
feeling full, bloating, constipation, leaky gut syndrome, yeast or
candida, irritable bowel […] irritability, persistent sadness,
insomnia, adrenal weakness, low thyroid, coping with life’s
challenges […] circulatory weakness, heart
weakness and irregularity, lack of joy […] arthritis [...] back and
neck soreness, joint stiffness, motion pain, sore feet […]
susceptibility to colds and flus, recovery from serious systemic
illness […] affects all of the above and treated with herbal,
homeopathic and glandular remedies.”
So there was natural, alternatives, weirdo diagnostics, holistic and homeopathy again.
In “Health Program” [vsc 2015-08-08] we're
told:
“your health program might include:natural food
recommendations for your specific conditions, as well as instructions
about vitamin-dense foods we often miss in our diet, cleansing and
detoxification through the liver, lymph and colon cleanses with
herbs, diet and therapeutic juices, vitamin, mineral, enzyme and
herbal remedies that cleanse, feed and heal the body, homeopathic
remedies that gently stimulate healing and balance on physical and
emotional levels, reflexology and acupressure treatments to reduce
symptoms of pain and to help move body’s energy into a pattern of
health, therapeutic stretching instruction, breath awareness and
standing chi gung postures are recommended when needed, lifestyle
counseling as our actions affect our health and our thoughts,
attitudes and feelings affect our physiology and can be a powerful
transformational tool. Dr Boraas says work on one virtue each day,
and 'find a better feeling!'”
So there was cleansing and detoxification, also.
The page naturalhealingstore.com is the naturopathic doctor's
retail outlet.
Dr Boraas's Credentials:
Now, I don't see a school
listed for this naturopath, but we were told of “the American
Naturopathic Medical Certification and Accreditation Board.”
Perhaps
that is the “American Naturopathic Medical Certification Board“
at anmcb.org and the “American Naturopathic
Medical Accreditation Board” at anmab.org.
They have a set of schools listed at anmab.org [vsc 2015-08-08] which include, presently:
“American
Fitness Professionals and Associates, Inc. […] International
Institute of Original Medicine […] International Quantum
University for Integrative Medicine […] Naturopathic Institute of
Therapies and Education […] Trinity School of Natural Health […and]
The University of Natural Medicine.”
At one of these schools, Naturopathic Institute of Therapies and Education, we're
told in
"Homeopathics" [vsc 2015-08-08]:
"homeopathy
is extremely effective."
In their "Iridology and Sclerology" [vsc 2015-08-08] we're told:
“your eyes reveal the
health of your body. With iridology, we look at the iris, or the
colored part of the eye. The fiber structures that make up the iris
are actually nerve fibers, and these nerves reflex to every part of
the body. So, by assessing the fibers and colors that show, we can
determine which areas of the body lack balance and need nourishment.
With sclerology, we are looking at the sclera, or the whites of the
eyes. The different red lines and markings that appear in the whites
also relate to parts of the body. Generally, the iris reveals more
long-standing imbalances, while the sclera reveals areas of concern
right now. Learn all about yourself through your own eyes! We give
you a photo of your eyes and show you every detail that your body is
illustrating!"
Really.
Really.
In "Therapy Room" [vsc 2015-08-08] we're
told:
"detoxing foot soak […] this ionic soak helps to pull
impurities from the
body."
Really!
So,
homeopathy claimed as effective, bogus diagnostics, and
detoxification, just like AANP-CAND NDs and NMDs.
And at anmcb.org,
we're told about naturopathy in "American Naturopathic Medical Certification Board Code of Ethics" [2015 archived], which states:
"I will […] practice the
healing power of nature [...] perform in a professional manner [...]
constantly strive to achieve these objectives and ideals, dedicating
myself to my chosen profession."
So, like AANP-CAND type NDs,
there's coded vitalism and an of-the-professions claim, in a document
purportedly detailing naturopathic “ethics.”
And we've seen this
with AANP-CAND naturopathy as well.
Similarly, and I really mean that, SIMILARLY, AANMC, the AANP-CAND type ND school organization, also has a set of schools listed that include, presently:
Similarly, and I really mean that, SIMILARLY, AANMC, the AANP-CAND type ND school organization, also has a set of schools listed that include, presently:
“Bastyr University […]
Boucher Institute of Naturopathic Medicine (BINM) […]
Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine (CCNM) […]
National College of Natural Medicine (NCNM) […]
National University of Health Sciences (NUHS) […]
Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine & Health
Sciences (SCNM) […] University of Bridgeport - College of
Naturopathic Medicine (UBCNM).”
Those two lists of schools, in spite
of all their supposed differences, as naturopathy-containing schools,
share SO MUCH in common.
ND
Fjerstad:
This ND does use those initials on his web pages.
In “About Back to Nature Wellness Center” [2015 archived] we're told:
“since 1993, the Back To
Nature Wellness Center, in Litchfield, Minnesota, has been providing
naturopathic medical care to people in west central Minnesota […]
the center was founded, and is still served by Dr. Steven Fjerstad,
N.D., a trained and certified naturopathic doctor […by way of]
Clayton University of Natural
Health.”
On the page “Homeopathy” [2015 archived] we're told:
"the term homeopathy comes from the Greek words homeo, meaning
similar, and pathos, meaning suffering of disease. Homeopathy seeks
to stimulate the body’s ability to heal itself by giving very small
doses of highly diluted natural substances that come from plants,
minerals, or animals […] the treatments are used for a wide range
of health concerns, from wellness and prevention, to the treatment of
diseases and conditions such as allergies, asthma, chronic fatigue
syndrome, depression, digestive disorders, ear infections, headaches,
and skin rashes. The naturopathic doctor and staff at Back to Nature
Wellness Center is fully certified in homeopathic medicine and
capable of administering any treatments they deem beneficial to their
patients."
And on the page “Naturopathic Medicine” [2015 archived] we're
told:
“naturopathic medicine is an alternative medical system based
on natural remedies and the body’s innate ability to heal and
maintain itself. It has its origin the nature cure movement of
Europe. With its emphasis on safe and effective therapies […]
naturopathic medicine has proven to be particularly effective in
treating chronic health problems such as: fibromyalgia, depression,
chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit disorder, dementia,
various allergies, dermatological issues, high blood pressure,
osteoporosis, and many digestive issues.”
So, there's alternative,
natural, coded vitalism, and a claim of efficacy.
We're also told on that page:
“the
practice of naturopathic medicine is based on six core values
[...including] recognize, respect and promote the natural self
healing power of the body. Naturopathic Medicine seeks to eliminate
those things that block or inhibit the body’s innate and incredible
ability to heal and maintain itself […] the board certified
naturopathic doctor at Back to Nature Wellness Center practices these
core values.”
So, there again is coded vitalism and that claim of board
certification.
And:
"we focus on natural self healing and have
available a wide variety of naturopathic treatment modalities from
electrodermal screening, colon hydrotherapy, Ondamed [...] lymphatic drainage, therapeutic
massage and homeopathy.”
In “Electrodermal Screening“ [2015 archived] we're
told:
“electrodermal screening is performed by a naturopathic doctor
or a trained technician [...EDS] is an
instrument-based method for gathering information about the health
and well-being of the body via electrical measurements of the skin
along various points of the hands and feet […] with its focus on
the function of the body’s internal organs, [EDS] provides a wealth
of information about what is affecting the body […] this highly
effective and revealing method of assessment is a product of time
honored ancient Chinese medical principles, and 21st century computer
technology. Traditional Chinese medicine learned that a form of
bodily energy which they called 'chi,' is generated by internal
organs and circulates throughout the entire body, forming pathways
near the surface of the skin called 'meridians.' This whole-body
network is called 'the meridian system,' and this system carries with
it information about internal organs that can be used in diagnosis
[…] all the systems of the body such as liver kidneys, lungs, etc.,
are checked for stress. A graphic printout shows which organs
are doing well and which organs might need nutritional support to
improve their natural function. The entire body is then scanned for
toxic substances such as chemicals, viruses, bacteria, heavy metals,
etc. Toxic substances are often the source of disease or inhibition
of natural body function. Once these are determined and remove the
body enjoys a greater state of function and well being. With the
information gathered in an electrodermal screening a naturopathic
doctor will recommend a natural remedy such as herb, vitamin or
homeopathic specific to your health need [...] electrodermal screening has proven
especially effective in helping patients suffering from among other
things: asthma and various allergies, sensitivities to foods, pollen,
mold, etc., irritable bowel syndrome, colitis and Crohn's disease,
chronic and acute infections, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue
syndrome, heavy metal and chemical toxicity, ADD, ADHD, multiple
sclerosis, seizures, migraine headaches, hormone and nutritional
imbalances.”
Really.
Really.
What is Ondamed, you ask?
Another non-AANP naturopath's practice, Bärbel
Aldridge of Jamestown, NC, has the page “Ondamed Bioenergetic Therapy” [2015 archived] which
explains:
“if you are ailing or aging, Ondamed therapy can help you rebuild your health [...] through biofeedback scanning, the peerless Ondamed system enables us to select frequencies to apply as 'energy therapy.' And then Ondamed delivers these tissue-specific frequencies therapeutically, precisely targeting your issues [...] Ondamed safe, gentle electromagnetic energy waves could help you postpone the pathology of aging as well [... ]specific frequencies address common conditions such as arthritis, osteoporosis, pain relief, stress, sleep disturbance, addictions and candida infections, among many others [...] almost everyone can benefit from Ondamed therapy. Ondamed can be beneficial alone or it can complement other therapy. If you are recovering from trauma or disease, dealing with chronic pain, fatigue, or bone loss, or if you are generally healthy and want to increase vitality, Ondamed can help you build up your resistance and stamina and feel better. Clinical studies, as well as our experience at Healing Ways, show that pulsed electromagnetic therapy can help to reduce pain, inflammation and edema, facilitate cellular repair and regeneration, slow or reverse bone loss and support skeletal health, improve blood circulation and activate lymphatic drainage, support elimination of toxins, promote absorption of nutrients and minerals, improve sleep patterns and mood, and increase vitality, reduce the harmful effects of geopathic and environmental stress [...] during an Ondamed session at Healing Ways, the client sits or reclines comfortably in a chair, fully clothed, and the session typically takes up to an hour. The practitioner places applicators appropriately and scans the body with a range of supportive frequencies to determine which ones are best as therapy [...] programs addressing chronic conditions usually work best with repeated applications over weeks or months.”
Ka-ching.
Ka-ching.
And we're promised on that homepage of ND Fjerstad:
“most of our patients receive
appropriate treatments and therapies, make the required lifestyle
changes and then move on to live a well and healthy life.”
Promises, promises.
Promises, promises.
Reflections So Far at the End of This Episode 10 Part 2a:
Take naturopathy's homeopathy:
.
Well, I've spend a lot of time here looking at naturopaths themselves to kind of create a preponderance.
So you have AANP-CAND-type naturopaths, and then you have the ones who are not part of that structure and they're quite similar, obviously.
Take naturopathy's homeopathy:
not for medicinal purposes, please, because there aren't any, and especially not as a vaccine replacement!
That's crazy.
How about getting these homeopaths, who practice homeoprophylaxis, to use themselves as subjects in a highly controlled smallpox homeoprophylaxis trial!
That would be interesting.
That would be interesting.
Homeopathy, for me, when analyzing naturopathy, is a very interesting kind of, shall I say, biopsy or microcosm of the whole naturopathic thing.
Now, I wouldn't reduce naturopathy down to a small subsection of its expanse when thinking about it as, ironically, a whole, but I think homeopathy's presence and promotion by naturopathy is quite a useful indicator in terms of analysis.
AANP, even now, this here year 2015, even with Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council's report out, still promotes homeopathy as efficacious and somehow profound, as opposed to the junk that we know it is.
For instance, there's the AANP and ND Sharif -- a 2003 Bastyr ND graduate -- video "Dr. Sharif’s Interview with AANP Speaking on the Subject of Homeopathy" (vsc 2015-08-04), up at Youtube, telling us:
.
"I'm Dr. Sharum Sharif [...] I'm a naturopathic physician [...] my specialty is homeopathy [...] today I'm here to talk to you about homeopathy [...] pharmaceutical drugs, as a
rule [...] are palliative [...as in] covering up the symptoms without really addressing the root cause
[...homeopathy] hold[s] the promise of curing symptoms and diseases [...] they truly do provide that deep core healing
that we all want [...] the remedies can provide a fundamental shift in
your health on all levels [...] and they often do provide cure
[...fixing] that deep, underlying imbalance [...] it's the most impressive branch
of medicine I have ever come across [...] homeopathy is phenomenal
[...] we see profound changes every day [...] almost miraculous [...] homeopathy is the best kept secret when it comes to treating
psychiatric / psychological problems [...] of all types [...] homeopathy's phenomenal for treating psychological problems
[...and all other kinds of] disorders."
So, there's a claim of homeopathy's efficacy and a swipe at conventional medicine.
At the ND's practice, where the above video is embedded on the homepage, in "Naturopathic Medicine" [2015 archived], we're told:
"many of the individual therapies used in naturopathic medical practice have been scientifically validated, especially in the areas of [...and he includes, ISYN] homeopathy."
That epistemic claim is FALSE.
And at his practice, conveniently, ND Sharif has the May 2015 blog post "Is Homeopathy Scientific?" [2015 archived] which states:
"the most common assertion made by skeptics of homeopathy is that they cannot possibly be effective [...] that they are simply sugar pills that work only by means of placebo [...] since homeopathic remedies [...] are so extremely diluted that there is indeed hardly anything of the original substance left in the remedies, skeptics assert that the remedies must be completely void of any medicinal powers. It turns out, however, that the remedies work not due to any biochemical content, but due to the 'memory' that the water molecules retain within them once exposed to a substance, any substance [...] water molecules actually remember what has touched them! Since every substance changes water molecules in a unique fashion (i.e. creating a unique memory that water molecules can apparently store), each can lead to a unique remedy. Thus the large number of homeopathic remedies in existence."
"the most common assertion made by skeptics of homeopathy is that they cannot possibly be effective [...] that they are simply sugar pills that work only by means of placebo [...] since homeopathic remedies [...] are so extremely diluted that there is indeed hardly anything of the original substance left in the remedies, skeptics assert that the remedies must be completely void of any medicinal powers. It turns out, however, that the remedies work not due to any biochemical content, but due to the 'memory' that the water molecules retain within them once exposed to a substance, any substance [...] water molecules actually remember what has touched them! Since every substance changes water molecules in a unique fashion (i.e. creating a unique memory that water molecules can apparently store), each can lead to a unique remedy. Thus the large number of homeopathic remedies in existence."
Most homeopathics are given as sugar pills.
So, we're only half way there, if water has memory:
how does water's memory transmit to the structure of a sugar crystal?
Why is that not talked about?
This mention of water memory returns me to my Part 1 list of terms I'd identified, particularly the term WOO:
how WOOFUL to state that water has memory.
ND Sharif goes on:
"skepticism is important, but pathological disbelief is unhealthy."
I agree:
I agree:
there is a distinction to be made between skepticism which asks you to 'show them the money', and cynicism which says 'nothing will change my mind'.
And making such a distinction is quite ironic, I think, for a naturopath to do because there is also a quite "unhealthy" issue with naturopathy itself and its naturopaths:
what I'll call 'pathological belief' or shall I say 'homeopathillogical belief.'
As in homeopathy, that Holy Cow that is cooked into naturopathy's DNA.
So ND Sharif ends by insisting:
"indeed homeopathy cannot be more scientific [...and informs] I have given talks on homeopathy at statewide, regional, and national associations (i.e. the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians). Over the years, I have taught homeopathy at various naturopathic schools in North America, and have seen it work on countless numbers of patients."
At his other practice page, "Visual Homeopathy", ND Sharif quotes a homeopathy proponent in the slideshow "Homeopathy In The Treatment Of Psychiatric And Psychological Disorders: Safe and Effective Medicine With A 200-Year History" [2015 archived].
That person states:
"disease is primarily a morbid disturbance or disorderly action of the vital force. Since homeopathic drugs correct the vital force [...] the entire organism automatically becomes corrected, including the mind [...and then ND Sharif states] toxicity (from the food, the environment such as radiation, and even internal toxicity due to poor organ function) can most definitely disrupt our mind, especially in chemically sensitive individuals. In my practice, in the cases of mild depression and/or anxiety, often patients feel significantly better by simply undertaking a simple naturopathic 'detox / cleansing' program [...and] healing always follows Hering’s Law of Cure, from emotional to physical, inside out, top to bottom, and in reverse order in time of appearance of the different symptoms."
Right.
Right.
The AANP is actually appealing to the U.S. Federal government for continued 'special protection' of homeopathy's remedies this year.
The AANP states in "AANP Stands Up for Homeopathic Medicines" (2015-04-27) [2015 archived]:
"AANP Board member Amy Rothenberg, ND, DHANP, provided expert testimony at a recent FDA hearing intended to assess whether or not the agency should change its regulatory approach to homeopathic products [...] Dr. Rothenberg is board certified by the Homeopathic Academy of Naturopathic Physicians. She and her husband, Dr. Paul Herscu, founded the New England School of Homeopathy [...] 'AANP believes that FDA's current approach is working well,' Dr. Rothenberg commented.'"
This is because homeopathy is exempt from pre-market SCIENTIFIC vetting before retail sale.
The ND reminds us in this post:
"FDA could decide to regulate homeopathic products the way it does over-the-counter drugs. If that were to occur, the makers of homeopathic medicines would have to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of their products before they could be sold in drug stores and natural food shops."
WHY is AANP comfortable with how things are NOW?
Shouldn't we know what works BEFORE we sell it, in a 'scientifically know-it' kind of way?
ND Rothenberg then states:
"'the low cost of these medicines, as well as the consistent quality of product, make them appealing to both physician and patient. Over decades of use, we have not found problems or variability with quality of the homeopathic product, and no toxicity has been reported.'"
"'the low cost of these medicines, as well as the consistent quality of product, make them appealing to both physician and patient. Over decades of use, we have not found problems or variability with quality of the homeopathic product, and no toxicity has been reported.'"
Quality sugar pills which have been consistently nontoxic and cheap.
This sounds not like pharmacy but the production of:
CANDY.
CANDY.
There is though ONE HUGE difference as compared to their nonAANP-CAND counterparts:
money.
The AANMC
apparatus is a money vacuum.
On the web page "Naturopathy / Naturopathic Medicine"
[vsc 2015-08-07], the Princeton Review tells us:
"selected schools:
Boucher Institute of Naturopathic Medicine New Westminster, BC $17,950
Tuition 154 Enrolled;
Bastyr University - School of Naturopathic Medicine
Kenmore, WA $31,789 Tuition 591 Enrolled;
Canadian College of
Naturopathic Medicine Toronto, ON $20,100 Tuition 542 Enrolled;
University of Bridgeport - College of Naturopathic Medicine Bridgeport,
CT $25,370 Tuition [with no enrollment number];
National College of Natural Medicine Portland, OR
$24,150 Tuition 422 Enrolled."
Now, UB doesn't have there an enrollment
number, so I'll guess a number, 150.
There are, actually MORE ND schools
than what is listed:
such as NUHS and SCNM.
So, let's do some math:
(average tuition) X (4 years) X (total enrollment of these 5 schools) =
$23,600 X 4 X 1859 =
And I think I've low-balled it.
Now, this has been going on since the late 1970s, by the way.
I'm only covering four years with that number.
That's A LOT of money being spent on an area that claims categorically to be "science" and yet contains huge swaths of what is PATENTLY science-exterior.
HOW are they allowed to
process SO MUCH money under an obviously FALSE position, and likely mostly through Title IV?
Now, my overarching episode question for this Naturocrit Podcast Episode 010 is:
“what does the abundant CATEGORICAL false labelings of naturopathy's contents as science, as demonstrated by Minnesota post-secondary academic institutions, indicate regarding the ethicality of contemporary U.S. higher education, and its regard for consumer protections and patient informed consent?"
I can't answer that directly until I cover the other school.
But, from this Part 2a, you can quite easily see NDs themselves in Minnesota engage in "false labelings", and I'd argue that 'they got there through where and how they were miseducated.'
The NDs are the products or the outcomes of the 'ND schools' falsehood apparatus' -- aka products of The Education Robbers -- with the AANP-CAND part of that 'they' being:
FULLY accredited, in-residence, '.gov' sanctioned.
---
---
No comments:
Post a Comment