Changelog 2016-06-04 and ND Video

here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database.  I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:

[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically.  Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense!  Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional."  Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]

001. added:

the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:

ND Sangiuliano;
ND Saunders;
ND Scholten;
 ND Schulz;
 ND Sepúlveda;
to Appendix B.05.i.i.00.;

ND Silver;
to Appendix B.05.i.i.02.;

ND Spano;

to Appendix B.05.i.i.03.a.;

ND Stark;

to Appendix B.05.i.i.03.b.;

 

ND Streich;

to Appendix B.05.i.i.03.c.;

the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:

ND Dehen;

to Appendix I.05.d.;

the Washington Association of Naturopathic Physicians;

to Appendix I.03.main.; 

the British Columbia Naturopathic Association;

to Appendix I.03.bcna.;

 comments:

@forbes.com:

in "Why is Big Naturopathy Afraid of This Lone Whistleblower?"

(2016-05-31):

"The Naturocrit Podcast and Blog:  Great article.

What I also find amazing is that in licensed states,

naturopaths’ laws usually don’t mandate a code of

ethics or standard of practice. It’s the

Wild Wild Wild West!

-r.c." 

odds and ends:

republished Appendix I.03.bcna.;

002. video link and commentary:

Butler-Birmingham, K. (ND CCNM) tells us in "Dr.K's What is Naturopathic Medicine?" (vsc 2016-06-01):

.

.

[tags: #claimoftreatingcause #signsconfusedwithsymptoms]

.

"hi, I'm Dr. Kaitlin Butler-Birmingham, naturopathic doctor [...] naturopathic medicine is pretty unique [...because] it tries to address the root cause of disease [...]";

this is the accusation that modern medicine doesn't do such.

"it looks at the physical, mental, emotional and even environmental causes of illness [...]";

as if MDs don't.  Where's that spiritual, that NDs claim to have expertise in too?  Hidden...Occult... (wink-wink).

"it's not just let's treat the symptom, being high blood pressure [...] the symptom, which is the high blood pressure [...]";

well, need I remind the doctor that high blood pressure is objectively measured, it is not a symptom.  It can be secondary to an underlying pathology, but it is not a symptom.  A symptom is experienced by the patient.  Naturopathy can't seem to tell the difference between objective fact and subjective whatever.

"my focus is actually in sports medicine [...] soccer and working out [...] physical activity [...]";

doesn't sound very naturopathic to me.