001. the Editors at Scientific American write in "Donald Trump’s Lack of Respect for Science Is Alarming" [dated 2016-09-01]:
"four years ago in these pages, writer Shawn Otto warned our readers of the danger of a growing antiscience current in American politics. 'By turning public opinion away from the antiauthoritarian principles of the nation's founders,' Otto wrote, 'the new science denialism is creating an existential crisis like few the country has faced before' [...]";
well that interesting because Otto's book "The War on Science" is my current summer reading.
"Americans have long prided themselves on their ability to see the world for what it is, as opposed to what someone says it is or what most people happen to believe [...] a respect for evidence is not just a part of the national character. It goes to the heart of the country's particular brand of democratic government [...e.g] the Declaration of Independence [...and its] primacy of reason based on evidence [...]";
hear, hear.
"for more than 170 years we have documented, for better and
for worse, the rise of science and technology and their impact on the
nation and the world. We have strived to assert in our reporting,
writing and editing the principle that decision making in the sphere of
public policy should accept the conclusions that evidence, gathered in
the spirit and with the methods of science, tells us to be true [...] Scientific American is not in the business of endorsing political
candidates. But we do take a stand for science [...] and the Enlightenment values
that gave rise to it [...] one of the two major party candidates for the highest office in the
land has repeatedly and resoundingly demonstrated a disregard, if not
outright contempt, for science. Donald Trump also has shown an
authoritarian tendency to base policy arguments on questionable
assertions of fact and a cult of personality [...] the current presidential race, however, is something special. It takes
antiscience to previously unexplored terrain. When the major Republican
candidate for president has tweeted that global warming is a Chinese
plot, threatens to dismantle a climate agreement 20 years in the making
and to eliminate an agency that enforces clean air and water
regulations, and speaks passionately about a link between vaccines and
autism that was utterly discredited years ago, we can only hope that
there is nowhere to go but up [...] we encourage the nation's political leaders to demonstrate a respect for
scientific truths in word and deed. And we urge the people who vote to
hold them to that standard [...]";
hear, hear, hear.
No comments:
Post a Comment