Monday, July 23, 2018

Changelog 2018-07-23 and ND Video

here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database.  I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:


[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically.  Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense!  Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional."  Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]

001. added:

the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:


the journal Integrative Medicine
 [ND Pizzorno];
to Appendix B.04.b.

ND Chodosh;

ND Nelson;
ND Nicolai;
ND Nortman;

the World Naturopathic Federation;

the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:


CCNM;

the journal Integrative Medicine
[ND Pizzorno];
to Appendix I.04.02.

UBCNM;

the 'scientific rejection of vitalism':


in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,
via Buchholz and Collins:
"with Buchner's work the dogma of the ‘vis vitalis’ fell.
It initiated a new paradigm, the biochemical paradigm";
[vol. 97, iss. 9,  (May 2013): 3747-62;
DOI:10.1007/s00253-013-4768-2]
to Appendix C.04.;



002. video link and commentary:
.
at the YouTube account Dr. Doni Wilson, there's the longisland.news12.com "Long Island Naturally" video [an antimedical show] "Why Should You Trust Naturopathic Medicine?" [saved 2018-07-19] which states:
.


[tags: #NDWilson #NDLogiudice ]
.
"[there's a decent amount of dead space in this video; with a host that is totally softball aka not journalistic but gullible-promotional IMHO; ND L. states at 00.13.08] I think we've done a remarkable job";

you don't say.  Well, you shouldn't trust naturopathic doctors despite their assurances. Pseudoscience is not remarkable.

No comments: