here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database. I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:
[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically. Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense! Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional." Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]
001. added:
the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:
the American Medical Association;
the Association of Naturopathic Practitioners [UK, Ireland, EU];
the British Naturopathic Association;
the General Council and Register of Naturopaths [UK];
the General Naturopathic Council;
the World Naturopathic Federation;
to Appendix B.02.;
NDs Blake, Brown, Buratovich,
Chaitow, Cronin, Isbell,
Lewis, Lynch, Moore,
Neary, Newman Turner,
Orrock, Shipley, Snider,
Wallden, Youngs, Zeff;
NDs Calabrese, Snider, Standish;
the College of Naturopathic Medicine UK;
to Appendix B.01.c.;
the Florida Naturopathic Physicians Association;
to Appendix B.03.;
NDs Hinchey, Morelli, Preston, Yimoyines;
NDs Hnatko & Kim;
ND Tang;
ND Triboulet;
ND Turnewitsch;
ND van der Geest;
ND Wylde;
the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:
the Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors;
ND Hinchey;
NDs Hinchey, Morelli, Preston, Yimoyines;
to Appendix I.05.g.;
Oregon Health and Science University;
to Appendix I.01.b.;
SCNM;
Southern Cross University;
to Appendix I.01.b.;
the 'scientific rejection of vitalism':
the Journal Homeopathy [of all places];
to Appendix C.04.;
"the vital force was a basic element of 18th-century science,
the existence of such a sui generis force of nature was refuted
with the formulation of the law of the conservation of energy
by mid-19th century";
[Waisse, S., & Bonamin, L. V. (2016). Explanatory models
for homeopathy: from the vital force to the current paradigm.
Homeopathy: The Journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy,
105(3), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.homp.2016.02.003]
002. video link and commentary:
002.a. the UK's College of Naturopathic Medicine YouTube account has up the video "History and Philosophy of Naturopathy" [saved 2020-09-06] which states:
.
.
[tags: #codedvitalism]
.
.
.

No comments:
Post a Comment