Thursday, September 10, 2020

Changelog 2020-09-10 and ND Video

here, I summarize recent additions to my public naturopathy database.  I also link to an ND's video each changelog, quote from, and tag the video in some detail:

 [Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically.  Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense!  Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional."  Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]

001. added:

the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:

the American Medical Association;

the Association of Naturopathic Practitioners [UK, Ireland, EU];

the British Naturopathic Association;

the General Council and Register of Naturopaths [UK];

the General Naturopathic Council;

the World Naturopathic Federation;

to Appendix B.02.;

NDs Blake, Brown, Buratovich,

Chaitow, Cronin, Isbell,

Lewis, Lynch, Moore,

Neary, Newman Turner,

Orrock, Shipley, Snider,

Wallden, Youngs, Zeff;

to Appendix B.05.i.a.04.;

NDs Calabrese, Snider, Standish;

to Appendix B.05.i.bb00.;

the College of Naturopathic Medicine UK;

to Appendix B.01.c.;

the Florida Naturopathic Physicians Association;

to Appendix B.03.;

NDs Hinchey, Morelli, Preston, Yimoyines;

NDs Hnatko & Kim;

to Appendix B.05.ic.03.;

ND Tang;

ND Triboulet;

ND Turnewitsch;

to Appendix B.05.i.k.;

ND van der Geest;

ND Wylde;

to Appendix B.05.i.L.;

the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:

the Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors;

to Appendix I.02.i.b.;

ND Hinchey;

NDs Hinchey, Morelli, Preston, Yimoyines;

to Appendix I.05.g.;

Oregon Health and Science University;

to Appendix I.01.b.;

SCNM;

to Appendix I.01.a7.;

Southern Cross University;

to Appendix I.01.b.;

the 'scientific rejection of vitalism':

the Journal Homeopathy [of all places];

to Appendix C.04.;

"the vital force was a basic element of 18th-century science,

the existence of such a sui generis force of nature was refuted

with the formulation of the law of the conservation of energy

by mid-19th century";

[Waisse, S., & Bonamin, L. V. (2016). Explanatory models

for homeopathy: from the vital force to the current paradigm.

Homeopathy: The Journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy

105(3), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.homp.2016.02.003]

002. video link and commentary:

002.a. the UK's College of Naturopathic Medicine YouTube account has up the video "History and Philosophy of Naturopathy" [saved 2020-09-06] which states:

.


[tags: #codedvitalism]

.

"[hosted by Berger, E. (ND ?); from the description] naturopathy is a system of healthcare which encourages and promotes the body's own self-healing mechanisms [...from the video] the grounding of naturopathy [...] these core principles [...] what we do as natural therapists is encourage, and help, and support the body to heal itself.  This is one of the key philosophies of naturopathy [...] allowing the body to heal itself [...] naturopathy is a system of healthcare which encourages and promotes the body's own self-healing mechanisms [...] to promote the body's own self-healing mechanisms [...] ";
.
so, not an ounce of transparency. While, the UK's GNC which CNM is a part of states that vitalism.

.

.


No comments: