01. the science claims of UBCNM, one example:
(per http://www.bridgeport.edu/ub/nm/Today's_Nat.htm ; archived here {2004}, http://web.archive.org/web/20040405090112/http://www.bridgeport.edu/ub/nm/Today's_Nat.htm ):
"today's naturopathic physician [...is] practicing scientific medicine."
Note: the claim is that the practice of naturopathy is scientific -- naturopathy is what naturopaths do / practice, therein labeled "scientific."
02. the essential vitalism of UBCNM, one example:
(per http://www.bridgeport.edu/ub/nm/Six_Prihtm.htm ; archived here {2004}, http://web.archive.org/web/20040603150636/http://www.bridgeport.edu/ub/nm/Six_Prihtm.htm ):
"[naturopathy's] six guiding principles. Guiding principle # 1 [their PRIMARY principle]: the healing power of nature [aka] viz [sp., vis] medicatrix naturae: the body has the inherent ability to establish, maintain, and restore health. The healing process is ordered and intelligent; nature heals through the response of the life force."
Note: a "life force" is outright vitalism, the core / primary naturopathic principle.
03. what science says about vitalism, one example:
as the Wikipedia.org article "Vitalism" notes (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitalism),
quoting Alan Sokal, PhD:
"nearly all the pseudoscientific systems to be examined in this essay are based philosophically on vitalism [...] mainstream science has rejected vitalism since at least the 1930s, for a plethora of good reasons that have only become stronger with time" (from ISBN 0415305926; 2006).
04. the huge absurdity:
labeling what is not science as science. Something is not the same as something it is vastly different from, and excluded from -- duh. An ND degree is a regionally accredited, States and Federal Government sanctioned subterfuge.
No comments:
Post a Comment