[Mission emphasis: I do this continuous exercise to expose the inherent fraud that naturopathy is logically, academically, commercially, legislatively / politically and clinically. Hugely misleading category labels such as "science based" and "evidence based" "nonsectarian" are being placed upon what truly is science-exterior and even more so disproven sectarian / quack nonsense! Then, the largest of betrayals toward the public occurs with highly orchestrated '.gov' endorsements of naturopaths as "licensed" and "professional." Beware, the naturopathic licensed falsehood racket marches on!]
001. added:
the vitalism [science-ejected subset naturopathy] claims of:
ND Phillips;
ND Pedro;
ND Perlman;
ND Powell;
the 'science subset naturopathy' category claims of:
ND Barnes;
ND Blesoff;
to Appendix I.05.b.;
NDs Falk, Jones, Levins;
NDs Florian and Ritcey;
to Appendix I.05.e.;
NDs Hansen, Lawrence, Tressel;
ND Hasel;
NDs Hassberger, Kurinsky, and Schoenek;
ND Hegnauer;
ND Hendershot;
NDs Herring and Rho;
NDs Holland and Nelson;
the Alaska Association of Naturopathic Physicians;
the Arizona Naturopathic Medical Association;
the California Naturopathic Doctors Association;
the State of California;
the State of California;
the State of Colorado;
the Connecticut Naturopathic Physicians Association;
the District of Columbia Association of Naturopathic Physicians;
the District of Columbia;
the District of Columbia Association of Naturopathic Physicians;
the District of Columbia;
'naturopathy blends':
NDs Florian and Ritcey;
to Appendix G.05.b.;
ND Perlman;
ND Phillips;
002. video link and commentary:
Sachdev, A. (ND CCNM 2002) states:
.
002.a. in the YouTube video "DrSachdevND" (2017):
"this is doctor Anita Sachdev [stethoscope around neck...] I've been in health care for over twenty years so I certainly bring an expertise to the field [...and she's treated] eczema [...and] brain metastasis from breast cancer [...] see what I can do for you [...]";
so, let's check out her practice.
so, let's check out her practice.
002.b1. in "Hear My Thoughts" (2017):
"these treatments may, however, lack scientific validity or reasonable evaluation and need to be carefully reconsidered";
so, mentioned is the importance of 'scientific validity' and assumably some kind of expertise in 'what is science supported'.
so, mentioned is the importance of 'scientific validity' and assumably some kind of expertise in 'what is science supported'.
002.b2. in "Informed Consent to Naturopathic Treatment" (2017):
"naturopathic medicine offers a comprehensive approach to improving health and treating illness in patients of all ages. It incorporates the art and science of disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention through the use of natural substances and natural therapies including: acupuncture / traditional Chinese medicine; botanical (herbal) medicine; homeopathic medicine; physical medicine [...] clinical nutrition; and lifestyle counseling";
so, again, science and then what's patently not science. Does not compute: comprehensively homeopathy is science-ejected. Yet we were led to believe "scientific validity" and "expertise."
so, again, science and then what's patently not science. Does not compute: comprehensively homeopathy is science-ejected. Yet we were led to believe "scientific validity" and "expertise."
No comments:
Post a Comment